Advertisement

Ground Vegetation: The B-2 Experiment

  • Per Holm Nygaard
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 104)

Abstract

In all the experimental plots of the B-2 experiment a 4m2 large sample plot was located systematically in the NW corner of the treatment plot. The cover of each plant species in the sample plot was estimated visually to the nearest whole percent. Nomenclature follows Lid (1985) for vascular plants, Smith (1980) and Grolle (1976) for mosses, and Krog et al. (1980) for lichens, except that Cladina is seperated from Cladonia as a genus.

Keywords

Detrended Correspondence Analysis Ground Vegetation Simulated Acid Rain Pleurozium Schreberi Feather Moss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamsen G (1980) Acid preciptation, plant nutrients, and forest growth. In: Drabløs D, Tollan A (eds) Ecological impact of acid precipitation. Proceedings of an international conference. (SNSF Project) Oslo-Ås, pp 58–63.Google Scholar
  2. Barsukova AV, Pjatkovskaja VP (1977) Vlijanie kornevoj sistemy jeli na dinamiku cislennosti i ziznennogo sostojanija nekotorykh rastenij travjanoustarnickovogo jarusa jelnikazelenomosnika. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser Biol 4:56–64.Google Scholar
  3. Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Grolle R (1976) Verzeichnis der Lebermoose Europas und benachbarter Gebiete. Feddes Rep 87:171–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hill MO (1979) DECORANA-A FORTRAN porgram for detrended correspondence analysis and resiprocal averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Horill AD (1972) Biological flora of the British Isles. Melampyrum crisatum L. J Ecol 60:235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hutchinson TC, Scott MG (1988) The response of the feather moss, Pleurozium schreberi to 5 years of simulated acid precipitation in the Canadian boreal forest. Can J Bot 66:82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchinson TC, Dixon M, Scott MG (1986) The effects of simulated acid rain on feather mosses and lichens of the boreal forest. Water Air Soil Pollut 31:409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krog H, Østhagen H, Tønsberg T (1980) Lavflora. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Lid J (1985) Norsk, svensk, finsk flora. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  11. Maarel E van der (1979) Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effect on community similarity. Vegetatio 39:97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Masselink AK (1980) Germination and seed population dynamics in Melampyrum pratense L. Acta Bot Neerland 29:451–468.Google Scholar
  13. Nygaard PH, Abrahamsen G (1991) Effects of long-term artificial acidification on the ground vegetation and soil in a 100-year-old stand of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Plant Soil 131:151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogner G, Haugen A, Opem M, Sjøtveit G, Sørlie B (1984) The chemical analysis program at the Norwegian Forest Research Institute. Norwegian Forest Research Institute, Ås.Google Scholar
  15. Pedersen O (1988) Biological Data Program/PC. Version 1.01. VegeDataConsult, Oslo.Google Scholar
  16. Peet RK, Knox RG, Case JS, Allen RB (1988) Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 131:924–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rehfuess KE (1981) Über die Wirkungen der säuren Niederschlage in Waldø kosystemen. Forstw Centralbl 100:363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodenkirchen H (1986) Auswirkungen von saurer Beregnung und Kalkung auf die Vitalität, Arttenmächtigkeit, und Nährstoffversorgung der Bodenvegetation eines Fichten Bestandes. Forstw Centralbl 105:301–380.Google Scholar
  19. Smith AJE (1963) Variation in Melampyrum pratense L. Watsonia 5:336–367.Google Scholar
  20. Smith AJE (1980) The moss flora of Brittain and Irland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1983) Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Teigen O, Abrahamsen G, Haugbotn O (1976) Eksperimentelle vekstundersøkelser i skog. 2. Lysimeterundersøkelser. (SNSF Project, IR 26/76) Oslo-Ås.Google Scholar
  23. Ter Borg SJ (1985) Population biology and habitat relations of some hemiparasitic Scrophulariaceae. In: White J (ed) The population structure of vegetation. Handbook of vegetation science. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 463–487.Google Scholar
  24. Wartenberg D, Ferson S, Rohlf JF (1987) Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 129:434–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weber HC (1976) Über Wirtspflanzen und Parasitismus einiger mitteleuropä ischer Rhinanthoideae. Plant Syst Evolut 25:97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Holm Nygaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Norwegian Forest Research InstituteÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations