Abstract
IN 1983 TECHNICAL FORUM CONDUCTED A SURVEY ABOUT CHOICES and techniques for breast augmentation. We received more than 300 replies—about 90% of those to whom the questionnaire was mailed—with some strong opinions. In 1983 we were trying axillary incisions and double-lumen implants, and a few surgeons were still working with saline implants. At least 50% of the first 300 respondents to the survey said that they had abandoned the axillary incision, primarily because of scarring and the inability to create a central and medial pocket, a message repeated at our national meetings. I looked at several presentations on axillary surgery and was not impressed. However, when I performed the next dozen or so periareolar incisions, I asked myself if I could have created that space, lowered the inframammary fold, or cauterized bleeders from the axilla.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilkinson, T.S. (1994). Breast Augmentation. In: Practical Procedures in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2594-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2594-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7598-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2594-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive