Skip to main content

First Order Bounded Arithmetic and Small Boolean Circuit Complexity Classes

  • Conference paper
Feasible Mathematics II

Part of the book series: Progress in Computer Science and Applied Logic ((PCS,volume 13))

Abstract

A well known result of proof theory is the characterization of primitive recursive functions ƒ as those provably recursive in the first order theory of Peano arithmetic with the induction axiom restricted to Σ1 formulas. In this paper, we study a variety of weak theories of first order arithmetic, whose provably total functions (with graphs of a certain form) are exactly those computable within some resource bound on a particular computation model (boolean circuits, with possible parity or MOD 6 gates, or threshold circuits, or alternating Turing machines, or ordinary Turing machines). To establish these kinds of results for small complexity classes, we provide a recursion-theoretic characterization of the complexity class, prove how one can encode sequences in very weak theories, and use the witnessing technique of [7].

Research partially supported by NSF INT-9014569 and CCR-9102896.

Research partially supported by NSF INT-9014569.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Ajtai. The complexity of the pigeon hole principle. In Proceedings of IEEE 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1988. pp. 346 – 355.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ajtai. Parity and the pigeonhole principle. In S.R. Buss and P.J. Scott, editors, Feasible Mathematics, pages 1–24. Birkhäuser, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Allen. Arithmetizing uniform NC. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 53 (1): 1 – 50, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Mix Barrington, N. Immerman, and H. Straubing. On uniformity in NC 1. J. Comp. Syst. Sci., 41(3):274–306, 1990. Preliminary version appeared in Structure in Complexity Theory: 3rd Annual Conference, IEEE Computer Society Press (1988), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D.A. Barrington. Bounded-width polynomial-size branching programs recognize exactly those languages in nc 1. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 38:150–164,1989. Preliminary version in Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing(1986) 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Beame, R. Impagliazzo, J. Krajíček, T. Pitassi, P. Pudlák, and A. Woods. Exponential lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Victoria, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Buss. Bounded Arithmetic, volume 3 of Studies in Proof Theory. Bibliopolis, 1986. 221 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Buss. The propositional pigeonhole principle has polynomial size Frege proofs. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 52:916 – 927, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Clote. Arithmetic: Proof theory and model theory. MIT Lecture Notes, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Clote. A sequential programming language for parallel complexity classes. Technical Report BCCS-88-07, Boston College, Computer Science Department, November 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Clote. A first order theory for the parallel complexity class NC. Technical Report BCCS-89-01, Boston College, Computer Science Department, January 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Clote. ALOGTIMEand a conjecture of S.A. Cook. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 6:57–106, 1992. extended abstract in proceedings of IEEE Logic in Computer Science, Philadelphia, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Clote. Polynomial size frege proofs of certain combinatorial principles. In P. Clote and J. Krajíček, editors, Arithmetic, Proof Theory and Computational Complexity, pages 162 – 184. Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Clote and E. Kranakis. Boolean functions, parallel computation and proof systems. Monograph in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Clote and G. Takeuti. Bounded arithmetics for NC, ALOGTIME, Land NL. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 56: 73 – 117, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Clote and G. Takeuti. Bounded arithmetic and very fast parallel time. Typeset manuscript, July 24, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.G. Clote. Sequential, machine-independent characterizations of the parallel complexity classes ALOGTIME, AC k , NC kand NC. In P.J. Scott S.R. Buss, editor, Feasible Mathematics, pages 49–70. Birkhäuser, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Cobham. The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions. In Y. Bar-Hillel, editor, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science II, pages 24–30. North-Holland, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.A. Cook. A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms. Information and Control, 64: 2 – 22, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Handley, J. B. Paris, and A. J. Wilkie. Characterizing some low arithmetic classes. In Theory of Algorithms, pages 353 – 364. Akademie Kyado, Budapest, 1984. Colloquia Societatis Janos Bolyai.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.E. Hopcroft and J.D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory. Addison-Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Immerman. Expressibility and parallel complexity. SIAM J. Cornput., 18 (3): 625 – 638, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.C. Lind. Computing in logarithmic space. Technical Report Project MAC Technical Memorandum 52, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Takeuti. A second order version of S 12 and U 12 Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56 (3): 1038 – 1063, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Takeuti. RSUVisomorphism. In P. Clote and J. Krajíček, editors, Arithmetic, Proof Theory and Computational Complexity, pages 364–386. Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Birkhäuser Boston

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clote, P., Takeuti, G. (1995). First Order Bounded Arithmetic and Small Boolean Circuit Complexity Classes. In: Clote, P., Remmel, J.B. (eds) Feasible Mathematics II. Progress in Computer Science and Applied Logic, vol 13. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2566-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2566-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7582-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2566-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics