Skip to main content

Blastocyst’s State of Activity and the Window of Implantation in the Mouse

  • Conference paper
Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes

Part of the book series: Serono Symposia USA ((SERONOSYMP))

Abstract

Synchronized development of the embryo to the blastocyst stage and differentiation of the uterus to the receptive state are critical to the process of implantation (1). The attainment of a differentiated uterus to support embryo development and implantation is primarily the result of the coordinated effects of estrogen and progesterone (P4) (1, 2). In rodents the first conspicuous sign that the implantation process has been initiated is an increased endometrial vascular permeability at the site of the blastocyst apposition. This can be visualized as discrete blue bands along the uterus after an intravenous (IV) injection of a macromolecular blue dye solution (1). This increased vascular permeability coincides with the initial attachment reaction between the trophectoderm and uterine luminal epithelium (ULE) (3). The permeability reaction is considered one of the earliest prerequisite events in the implantation process (1). In the mouse the attachment reaction occurs at 2200–2300 h on day 4 of pregnancy and is preceded by luminal closure that results in an intimate apposition of the blastocyst to the ULE (1, 3, 4). The attachment reaction is followed by stromal decidualization and ULE apoptosis at the site of blastocyst (3, 5). This results in the subsequent adherence and penetration by trophoblasts through the underlying basement membrane (6). Trophoblast invasion continues through the stroma in a regulated manner by the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Psychoyos A. Endocrine control of egg implantation. In: Greep RO, Astwood EG, Geiger SR, eds. Handbook of physiology. Washington, DC: American Physiology Society, 1973: 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paria BC, Huet-Hudson YM, Dey SK. Blastocyst’s state of activity determines the “window” of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 10159–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Enders AC. Anatomical aspects of implantation. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 25: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Enders AC, Schlafke S. A morphological analysis of the early implantation stages in the rat. Am J Anat 1967; 120: 185–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parr EL, Tung HN, Parr MB. Apoptosis as the mode of uterine epithelial cell death during embryo implantation in mice and rats. Biol Reprod 1987; 36: 211–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlafke S, Enders AC. Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus at implantation. Biol Reprod 1975; 12: 41–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshinaga K, Adams CE. Delayed implantation in the spayed, progesterone treated adult mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1966; 12: 593–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huet YM, Dey SK. Role of early and late oestrogenic effects on implantation in the mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1987; 81: 453–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilsson O. The morphology of blastocyst implantation. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 39: 187–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin L, Finn CA. Hormonal regulation of cell division in epithelial and connective tissues of mouse uterus. J Endocrinol 1968; 41: 363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huet YM, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Cell type-specific localization of c-myc protein in the mouse uterus: modulation by steroid hormones and analysis of the periimplantation period. Endocrinology 1989; 125: 1683–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshinaga K. Inhibition of implantation by advancement of uterine sensitivity and refractoriness. In: Leroy F, Finn CA, Psychoyos A, Hubinot PO, eds. Blastocyst-endometrium relationships. Progress in reproductive biology and medicine. Basel: Karger, 1980; 7: 189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huet YM, Dey SK. Requirement for progesterone-priming and its long-term effect on implantation in the mouse. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1990; 193: 259–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Torbit CA, Weitlauf HM. Production of carbon dioxide in vitro by blastocysts from intact and ovariectomized mice. J Reprod Fertil 1975; 42: 45–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Psychoyos A. Uterine receptivity for nidation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986; 476: 36–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshinaga K. Hormonal interplay in the establishment of pregnancy. In: Greep RO, ed. International review of physiology. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976: 127–254.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wu TJ, Wang L, Wan YY. Expression of estrogen receptor gene in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 33: 407–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou Q, Gorski J. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor genes are expressed differentially in mouse embryos during preimplantation development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 9460–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McLaren A. Blastocyst activation. In: Segal SJ, Crozier R, Corfman PA, Condliffe PG, eds. The regulation of mammalian reproduction. Springfield, IL, 1973: 321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weitlauf HM. Metabolic changes in the blastocysts of mice and rats during delayed implantation. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 39: 213–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Paria BC, Das SK, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene is regulated in mouse blastocysts during delayed implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 55–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dey, S.K., Paria, B.C., Huet-Hudson, Y.M. (1995). Blastocyst’s State of Activity and the Window of Implantation in the Mouse. In: Dey, S.K. (eds) Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Periimplantation Processes. Serono Symposia USA. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2548-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2548-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7575-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2548-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics