Skip to main content

Management of Common Bile Duct Stones

  • Chapter
Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

Courvoisier reported the first successful choledocholithotomy (CL) before the turn of the century.1 A few years later, in 1912, the father of biliary surgery, Hans Kehr, published his landmark textbook based on 2,000 cases including patients with CBD stones. He invented T-tube drainage after surgical exploration of the CBD.2 It is ironic that the great American surgeon, William Halstead, a few years after a cholecystectomy, died of complications from a choledocholithotomy for retained stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

The Evolution of Common Bile Duct (CBD) Stone Removal

  1. Courvoisier LG. Casuistische Beitrage zur Pathologie und Chirurgie der Gallenwege. Vogel, Leipzig, 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kehr H. Die Praxis der Gallenwegchirurgie. Lehmann, München. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reich A. Accidental injection of bile ducts with petrolatum and bismuth paste. JAMA 1918; 71:1555.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tenney CF, Patterson SH. Injection of the bile ducts with bismuth paste. JAMA 1922; 78:171.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ginzburg L, Benjamin EW. Lipiodol studies of postoperative biliary fistulae. Ann Surg. 1930; 91:233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirizzi, PL. La cholangiografia durante las operaciones de las vias biliares. Bol Soc Cir Buenos Aires. 1932; 16:1133.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hicken NF, Best RR, Hunt HB. Cholangiography. Ann Surg. 1936; 103:210.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallet-Guy P. Television radioscopy during operations of the biliary passages. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958; 106:747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanini P. La roentgenscopia televisiva introperatoria delle vie biliari. Gaz Intern Med E Chir. 1963; 48:1435.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berci G, et al. Choledochoscopy and operative fluorocholangiography in the prevention of retained stones. World J Surg. 1978; 2:411.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berci G, Hamlin JA. Operative Biliary Radiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bakes J. Die choledochopapilloskopie. Arch Klin Chir. 1923; 126:473.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mclver MA. An instrument for visualizing the interior of the common duct at operation. Surgery. 1941; 9:112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wildegans H. Grenzen der cholangiography und Aussichten der Endoskopie der tiefen Gallenwege. Med Klin. 1953; 48:1270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shore JM, Morgenstern L, Berci G. An improved rigid choledoscope. Am I Surg. 1971; 122:567.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shulman AG, Berci G. Intraoperative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy) in California hospitals. Am I Surg. 1985; 149:703.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oi I, Kobayashi S, Kondo T. Endoscopic pancreatocholangiography. Endoscopy. 1970; 2:103.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968; 167:752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stain SC, et al. Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg. 1991; 213:627.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

The Evolving Role of ERCP in the Era of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  1. McCune WS, Short PE, Moscovitz M. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968; 167:752–756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1974; 20:148–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Classen M, Safrany L. Endoscopic papillotomy and removal of gallstones. Br Med J. 1975; 4:371–374.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel JH. Endoscopic papillotomy in the treatment of biliary tract disease. Dig Dis Sei. 1981; 16:1057–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples & oranges). Gut. 1984; 25:587–597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr-Locke DL. Acute gallstone pancreatitis and endoscopic therapy. Endoscopy. 1990; 22:180–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuschieri A, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161:385–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut. 1988; 29:114–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosseland AR, Solhaung JH. Primary endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in patients with stones on the common bile duct and the gallbladder in situ: 2–5–8 years follow-up study. World J Surg. 1988; 12:111–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller BM, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:135–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neoptolemos J A, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospective randomized study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J. 1987; 294:470–474.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinerman M, Boeckloo, Dimple W. Selective ERCP and preoperative stone removal in bile duct surgery. Ann Surg. 1989; 209:267–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ponchon T, et al. Biliary lithiasis: combined endoscopic and surgical treatment. Endosc. 1989; 21:15–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stiegemann G, et al. Endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1989; 124:787–790.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reddick EJ, et al. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy and choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 1988; 4:133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peters JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991; 24:2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cuschieri A, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161:385–387.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spaw AT, Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:2–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Voyles CR, et al. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161:367–370.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin IG, Curley P, McMahon MJ. Minimally invasive treatment for common bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 1993; 80:103–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arregui ME, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surgical Endoscopy. 1992; 6:10–15, plus current data to March 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Graham SM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. Ann Surg. 1993; 218:61–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawasli A, et al. The role of ERCP in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1993; 59:285–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandujano A. Santiago, Chile. Personal communication. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Larson GM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy expands the role of biliary endoscopy. Poster abstract SAGES meeting Washington, D.C. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Motson R, Wetter L. Operative choledochoscopy: common bile duct exploration is incomplete without it. Br J Surg. 1990; 77(9):975–982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pappas TN, Slimane TB, Brooks DC. 100 consecutive common duct explorations without mortality. Ann Surg. 1990; 211:260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McSherry CK, Glenn F. The incidence and causes of death following surgery for non-malignant biliary tract disease. Ann Surg. 1980; 191:271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Phillips E, et al. The management of suspected common bile duct stones. Abstract, SAGES Scientific Session, Washington, D.C. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Litwin D. Saskatoon, Canada. Personal communication 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gagner M, Deslandre E. Montreal, Canada. Personal communication. May, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. DePaula A. Goianias-Goias, Brazil. Personal communication. May, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Phillips EH, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of CBD stones. World J Surg. 1993; 17:22–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991; 1:79–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Lap arose Endosc. 1991; 2:33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quattlebaum JK, Flanders HD. Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Callans LS, Gadacz TR. Fragmentation of human gallstones using ultrasound and electrohydraulic lithotripsy: experimental and clinical experience. Surgery. 1990; 107:121–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Josephs LG, Birkett DH. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) for the treatment of large retained common duct stones. Am Surg. 1990; 56:232–234.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Matsumoto S, et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of intrahepatic stones during choledochoscopy. Surg. 1987; 102:852–856.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ponchon T, Valette PJ, Chavaillon A. Percutaneous transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy under endoscopic control. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987; 33:307–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Siegel JH, Den-Zvi JS, Pullano WE. Endoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990; 36:134–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tung GA, et al. Gallstone fragmentation with contact electrohydraulic lithotripsy: in vitro study of physical and technical factors. Radiology. 1990; 174:781–785.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yasuoa K, et al. Comparison of peroral and percutaneous cholangioscopy. Endoscopy. 1989; 21:237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yip YL. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gallstones in humans. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34:149–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Brodish RJ, Fink AS. ERCP, cholangiography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SAGES Opinion Survey. Surg Endosc. 1993; 7:3–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Acosta JM, Pellegrini CA, Skinner DB. Etiology and pathogenesis of acute biliary pancreatitis. Surg. 1980, 88:120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Acosta JM, et al. Early surgery for acute gallstone pancreatitis: evaluation of a systematic approach. Surg. 1977; 83:367–370.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Diaco JF, Miller LD, Copeland EM. The role of early laparotomy in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gyn Ob. 1969; 129:263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fan S-T, et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 328:228–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Neoptolemos JP, et al. Controlled trial of urgent ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988; ii:979–980.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Acosta JM, Ledesma CL. Gallstone migration as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1974; 290:484–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Peters JH, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991; 213:3–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zucker KA, et al. Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161:339–344.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Berci G, Sackier JM. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161:382–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kozarek RA, et al. ERCP after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a hepatobiliary referral center. Abstract, SAGES Scientific Session, Washington, D.C. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brooks DC, et al. Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SAGES Scientific Session, Washington, D.C. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Peters JH, et al. Biliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Poster Abstract, SAGES Meeting, Washington, D.C. April, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Woothon FT, et al. Biliary complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:2 183–185.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Geenen JE, et al. The efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy after cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989; 320:82–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Siegel JH. Endoscopic technique. In Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography Technique, Diagnosis and Therapy. New York: Raven Press 1992; Chapter I, p. 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

Intraoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

  1. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1974; 20:148–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1968; 167:752–756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Way LW, Sleisenger MH. Gastrointestinal Disease. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company. 1989, p. 1718.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991; 1:79–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Quattlebaum JK, Flanders HD. Laparoscopic treatment of CBD stones. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrol BJ, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparosc Surg. 1992; 2:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Paula AL, et al. Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter JG. Laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration. Amer J Surg. 1992; 163:53–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petelin J. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:33–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sackier JM, Berci G, Paz-Partlow M. Laparoscopic transcystic choledochoscopy as an adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1991; 57:323–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Safrany L. Endoscopic treatment of biliary-tract diseases: an international study. Lancet. 1978; 2:983–985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geenen JE, Vennes JA, Silvis SE. Resume of a seminar on endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS). Gastrointest Endosc. 1981; 27:31–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton PB. Non-operative removal of bile duct stones by duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Br J Surg. 1980; 67:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tedesco FJ, Vennes JA, Dreyer M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the USA experience in endoscopic surgery. In Endoscopic Surgery ed. H Okabe, T Honda, F Oshiba. New York: Elsevier, 1984. pp. 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McSherry CK. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:174–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin JK Jr., van Heerden JA. Surgery of the liver biliary tract, and pancreas. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980; 55:333–337.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frazee RC, van Heerden JA. Cholecystectomy with concomitant exploration of the CBD. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 168:513–516.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller BM, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic management of CBD stones. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:135–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostroff JW, Shapiro HA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. In ERCP: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications ed. IM Jacobson. New York: Elsevier, 1989. pp. 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goodall JR. Bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1985; 67:87–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saeed M, et al. Bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy: angiographic management by transcatheter embolization. Gastrointest Endose. 1989; 35:300–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Neoptolemos JP, et al. The management of CBD calculi by endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg. 1984; 71:69–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hershey SD, et al. The value of prophylactic antibiotic therapy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982; 155:801–803.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallace JR, et al. Assessment of pancreatic ductal penetration of antibiotics. Am Surg. 1984; 50:666–667.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bilbao MK, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Gastroenterology. 1976; 70:314–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor M, et al. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the surgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. 1986; 151:18–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dutta SK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the risk of bacteremia and the role of antibiotics in ERCP. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1983; 5:325–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Neuhaus B, Safrany L. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their treatment. Endoscopy. 1981; 13:197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sarr MG, et al. Pancreatitis or duodenal perforation after peri-Vaterian therapeutic endoscopic procedures: diagnosis, differentiation, and management. Surgery. 1986; 100: 461–466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Byrne P, Leung JWC, Cotton PB. Retroperitoneal perforation during duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Radiology. 1984; 150:383–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dunham F. Retroperitoneal perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy: clinical course and management. Endoscopy. 1982; 14:92–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuhlman JE, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: computed tomographic evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989; 14:127–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Classen M. Endoscopic papillotomy—new indications, short- and long-term results. Clin Gastroenterol 1985; 15:457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jayaprakash B, Wright R. Common bile duct perforation—an unusual complication of ERCP. Gastrointest Endose. 1986; 32:246–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Huibregtse K, Gish R, Tytgat GNJ. A frightening event during endoscopic papillotomy. Gastrointest Endose. 1988; 34:67–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sisley JF, Bowden TA, Mansberger AR Jr. Pancreatic duct disruption and duodenal hematoma associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. South Med J. 1987; 20:1441–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobson IM. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with intact gallbladders. In ERCP: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications ed. IM Jacobson. New York: Elsevier, 1989. pp. 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples and oranges). Gut. 1984; 25:587–597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Siegel JH, et al. The significance of duodenoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder en situ: report of a series of 1272 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83:1255–1258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Weaver DW, et al. Isoamylase analyses in patients undergoing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1983; 29:175A.

    Google Scholar 

  41. LaFerla G, et al. Hyperamylasaemia and acute pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas. 1986; 1:160–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Osnes M, Skjennald A, Larsen SA. Comparison of a new nonionic (metrizamide) and a dissociable (metrizoate) contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP). Scand J Gastroenterol 1977; 12:821–825.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cunliffe WJ, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing two contrast media in ERCP. Endoscopy. 1987; 19:201–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hamilton I, et al. Metrizamide as contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1982; 33:293–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Barkin JS, et al. Comparison of hypaque, omnipaque and hexabrix for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34:213A.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Makela P, Dean PB. The frequency of hyperamylasemia after ERCP with diatrizoate and iohexol. Eur J Radiol 1986; 6:303–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cohen N, et al. Pancreatic duct occlusion: a possible etiologic factor in pancreatitis post-ERCP and sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35:190A.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lasser EC, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317:845–849.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Beger HG, et al. Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis: a prospective clinical study. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91:433–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Arregui ME, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 1992; 6:10–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Barkum AN, et al. Role of ERCP in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In SAGES 1993 Scientific Session and Postgraduate Course, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Boulay J, Sehellenberg R, Brady PG. Role of ERCP and therapeutic biliary endoscopy in association with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Amer J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 837–842.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Escourrou J, et al. Early and late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis with and without the gallbladder in situ. Gut. 1984; 25:598–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hawes R, et al. Long term follow up after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987; 33:157A.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kawai K, Nakajima M. Present status and complications of EST in Japan. Endoscopy. 1983; 15:169–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Seifert E. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Endoscopy. 1988; 20:232–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Simon DM, Brooks WS Jr, Hersh T. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: a reappraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84:213–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cotton PB. 2–9 year follow up after sphincterotomy for stones in patients with gallbladders. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986; 32:157–158A.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ikeda S, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: long term results in 408 patients with complete follow-up. Endoscopy. 1988; 20:13–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Worthley CS, Toouli J. Gallbladder (GB) nonfilling contraindicates leaving the GB in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Gastrointest Endosc. 1987; 33:160A.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut. 1988; 29:114–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Heinermann PM, Boeckl O, Pimpl W. Selective ERCP and preoperative stone removal in bile duct surgery. Ann Surg. 1989; 209:267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ponchon T, et al. Biliary lithiasis: combined endoscopic and surgical treatment. Endoscopy. 1989; 21:15–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Van Stiegmann G, et al. Endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal prior to cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1989; 124:787–790.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Possard DP. Prospective randomized study of pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J. 294:470–474.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Arregui, ME. The evolving role of ERCP in the area of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In First International “Hands-on” Therapeutic ERCP Conference. Third World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Neuhaus H, et al. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1992; 24:745–749.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Grahan SM, et al. Utility of plamed perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 1992; 24:788–789.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Larson GM, et al. Multiplactice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1983 patients. Am J Surg. 1992; 163:221–226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Aliperti G, Edmundowicz SA, Soper NJ. Early experience with combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with choledocholithiasis. Am J Gastroenterology. 1990; 85:1245.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Pruitt RE, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy and common bile duct stone extraction combined with laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: our initial experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(2):286.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Manoukian AV, et al. Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy problems: “minimally invasive” ERCP therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:250.

    Google Scholar 

Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Calculi

  1. Mirizzi PL. Operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937; 65:702–710.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips EH, et al. The importance of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1990; 56:792–795.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips EH, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy and extraction of common bile duct stones. World I Surg. 1993; 17:22–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ. Laparoscopically guided cholecystectomy: a detailed report of 453 cases by one surgical team. Am Surg. 1993; 59(4):235–242.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll BJ, et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Lap endose Surg. 1992; 2(1):15–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ. New techniques for the treatment of common bile duct calculi encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Prob Gen Surg. 1991; 8(3):387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shimi S, Banting S, Cuschieri A. Transcystic drainage after laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct. Minimally Invasive Therapy. 1992; 1:273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter JG, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic management of bile duct stones. Surg Clin N Am. 1992; 72(5):1077–1080.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Appel SD. Wire guided cholangiography and transcystic common duct exploration. Third World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; Bordeaux, France; June 1992. (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuschieri A. Personal communication. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franklin MJ. Personal communication. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arregui ME, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endose. 1992; 6:10–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DePaula A, et al. Laparoscopic transcystic sphincterotomy in the management of 76 cases of choledocholithiasis. SAGES 1993 Scientific Session. Phoenix, Arizona; April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. NIH consensus conference—gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA. 1993; 269(8):1018–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neoptolemos JP, et al. Controlled trial of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy vs conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988; 8618: 979–983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stain SC, et al. Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J. 1987; 294:470.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salky B. Personal communication. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; apples and oranges. Gut. 1984; 25:587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Management of Common Bile Duct Stones and Other Common Bile Duct Diseases

  1. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: comparison with mini lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endoscopy. 1989; 2:121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dubois F, et al. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg. 1990; 211:6–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mouret P. Personal communication. Montreal (hDM), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Girotti MJ. Minimal access site surgery: laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll, Ph Surg Can. 1991; 24:77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gadacz TR, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg CI N Am. 1990; 70(6):1249–1262.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schirmer WJ, et al. Common operative problems in hepatobiliary surgery. Surg CI N Am. 1991; 70(6):1363–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer KA, Copos NJ, Mittlepunkt AI. Personal experience with 1,261 cases of acute and chronic cholecystitis and cholelithiasis. Surgery. 1967; 61:661–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganey JB, et al. Cholecystectomy: clinical experience with a large series. Am J Surg. 1986; 151:352–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herman RE. Surgery for acute and chronic cholecystitis. Surg CIN Am. 1990; 70(6):1263–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burhenna HJ. Percutaneous extraction of retained biliary stones: 661 patients. AJR. 1980; 134:889–898.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chespak LW, et al. Multidisciplinary approach to complex endoscopic biliary intervention. Radiology. 1989; 170:995–997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moody FG, et al. Lithotripsy for bile duct stones. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:241–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Safrary L, Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. Surg CIN Am. 1982; 62(5):825–836.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmon DS, Clemett AR. Endoscopic stents and drains in the management of pancreatic and bile duct obstruction. Surg CIN Am. 1982; 62(5):837–844.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cotton PB, Vallon AG. British experience with duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 1981; 68:373–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dion YM, Morin J. Correspondence: laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Ph Surg, Can. 1992; 25(1):69.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon RL, Howard AS. Nonoperative management of bile duct stones. Surg CIN Am. 1990; 70(6):1313–1328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller BM, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Am Surg. 1988; 207:135–141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stain SC, et al. Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic sphincterotomy or common duct exploration. Ann Surg. 1991; 223: 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berci G, Phillips E, Carroll BJ. Problems in general surgery: laparoscopic surgery: new techniques for the treatment of common bile duct calculi encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Sept. 1991; 8(3):387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carroll B et al. Laparoscopic choledochoscopy: an effective approach to the common duct. J Laparoendoscopic Surg. 1992; 2(1):15–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arregui ME, et al. The evolving role of ERCP and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Surgery. 1994 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs M, Verdeja J, Goldstein H. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. J Laparoendoscopic Surg. 1991; 1(2):79–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tompkins RK. Surgical management of bile duct stones. Surg CIN Am. 1990; 71(6):1329–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hever GJ. The factors leading to death in operation upon the gallbladder and bile duct. Ann Surg. 1934; 99(6):881–892.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Franklin ME, Dorman JP. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. In MH Braverman, RL Tawes, eds. Surgical Technology International II. Century Press, London, 1993; 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McSherry C, Glenn F. The incidence of causes of death following surgery for nonmalignant biliary tract diseases. Ann Surg. 1980; 191:271–275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pitt HA. Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg. 1993; 165:483–486.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pickelman J, Gonzalez RP. The improving results of cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1986; 121:930–934.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cotton PB, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the biliary endoscopist. Gastroint Endoscopy. 1991; 37(1):94–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lacaine F, Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 1980; 115:1114–1116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Saltzstein EC, Peacock JB, Thomas MD. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones. SG&O. 1982; 154:381–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McSherry C. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:174–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwabe G, et al. Treatment of calculi of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175:115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newhaus H, et al. Prospective evaluation of the utility and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 1992; 24: 745–749.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossand DP. Prospective randomized trial of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus sphincterotomy alone for common bile duct stones. Brit Med J. 1987; 294:470–174.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Spaw AT, Reddick EJ, Olsen DO. Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures. Surg Laparoscopy and Endoscopy. 1991; 1(1):2–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Franklin ME. The value of preoperative ERCP in patients prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Franklin MF, Pharand D, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Laparoscopy and Endoscopy. 1994; 4(2): 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  40. DePaula AL, et al. Laparoscopic antegrade sphincterotomy. Surg Laparoscopy and Endoscopy. 1993; 3(3): 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg. 1993; 165:487–491.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunter JB. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992; 163:53–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Carroll B, Phillips E. Laparoscopic removal of common duct stones. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics N Am. 1993; 3(2):239–346

    Google Scholar 

Fluoroscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  1. Hunter JG. Avoidance of common bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 162:71–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackier JM, Berci G, Phillips EW, et al. The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1991; 126:1021–1026.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wetter LA, Way LW. Surgical therapy for gallstone disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1991; 20(1):157–169.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vitale GC, Larson GM, Wieman TJ, et al. The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1993; 7:9–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gregg RO. The case for selective cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1988; 155:540–544.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hermann RE, Hoerr SO. The value of routine use of operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985; 161: 1015–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter JG. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992; 163:53–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Lap arose Endosc. 1991; 1:33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Pearlstein AR, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and extraction of common bile duct stones. SAGES 1992 postgraduate course: Challenges in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutsen WF, Stevensen VL, Franz B, Crowder E. The technique of operative cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1949; 78:347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bagnato VJ, McGee GE, Hatten LE, et al. Justification for routine cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:89–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey RW, Zucker KA, Flowers JL, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience with 375 patients. Ann Surg. 1991; 214:531–541.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berci G, Shore JM, Hamlin JA, et al. Operative fluoroscopy and cholangiography: the use of modern radiologic techniques during surgery. Am J Surg. 1977; 135:32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bruhn EW, Miller FJ, Hunter JG. Routine fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an argument. Surg Endosc. 1991; 5:111–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991; 1:33–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter JG, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Surg Clin North Am. 1992; 72:1077–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berci G. Biliary ductal anomalies. In: Operative Biliary Radiology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1981. Chapter 8:109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospective randomized study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. Br Med J. 1987; 294:470–474.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct pathology. SAGES General Session, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Berry SM, Zimmerman A, Fink AS. Fluoroscopically guided extraction of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SAGES General Session, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy of Common Bile Duct Stones

  1. Reuter HJ. Electric treatment of bladders stones. Endoscopy. 1968; 1:13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nasr ME. Studies on the fracture mechanism in urinary test concretions by lithotripter devices. Master of Science Thesis, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka M, Yoshimoto H, Ikeda S, et al. Two approaches for electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the common bile duct. Surgery. 1985; 98:(2)313–318.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Callans LS, Gadacz, TR. Fragmentation of human gallstones using ultrasound and electrohydraulic lithotripsy: experimental and clinical experience. Surgery. 1990; 107:(2), 121–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yip YL. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gallstones in humans (letter to the editor). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1988; 34:2,149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silvis SE, Sievert C. Comments on Dr. Yip’s letter (letter to the editor). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1988; 34:(2) 149–150.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denstedt JD, dayman RV. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi. J. Urol. 1990; 143(1):13–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tung GA, Mueller PR, Brink JA, et al. Gallstone fragmentation with contact electrohydraulic lithotripsy: in vitro study of physical and technical factors. Radiology. 1990; 174:781–785.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lear JL, Ring EA, Macoviak JA. Percutaneous transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Radiology. 1984; 150:589–590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatta K, Rosen DI, Flotte TJ, et al. Effects of shielded or unshielded laser and EHL on rabbit bladder. The Journal of Urology. 1990; 143:857–860.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burhenne, HJ. Electrohydrolytic fragmentation of retained common duct stones. Radiology. 1975; 117:721–722.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koch H, Stolte M, Walz U. Endoscopic lithotripsy in the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 1977; 9:95–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg. Endosc. 1992; 6:10–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto S, Tanaka M, Yoshimoto H, et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of intrahepatic stones during choledochoscopy. Surgery. 1987; 102:(5)852–856.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch H, Rosch W, Waltz V. Endoscopic lithotripsy in the common bile duct. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1980; 26:(1)16–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silvis SE, Siegel JE, Hughes R, et al. Use of electrohydraulic lithotripsy to fracture common bile duct stones. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1986; 32:155–156.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ponchon T, Chavaillon A, Ayela P, et al. Retrograde biliary ultrathin endoscopy enhances biopsy of stenoses and lithotripsy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1989; 35:(4)292–297.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonnel DH, Liguory CE, Cornud FE, et al. Common bile duct and intrahepatic stones: results of transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 50 patients. Radiology. 1991; 180:345–348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Malone DE, Burhenne HJ. Technical report: management of tract disruption due to radiologic T-tube extraction of a retained common bile duct stone. Clinical Radiology. 1991; 43:207–209.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason R. Percutaneous extraction of retained gallstones via the T-tube tract: British experience of 131 cases. Clinical Radiology. 1980; 31:497–499.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sackier JM, Berci G, Partlow MP. Laparoscopic transcystic choledocholithotomy as an adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The American Surgeon. 1991; 57:323–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy. 1991; 1:33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Harrison J, Morris DL, Haynes J, et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of gallstones: in vitro and animal studies. Gut. 1987; 28:267–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bean WJ, Daughtry JD, Rodan BA, et al. Ultrasonic lithotripsy of retained common bile duct stone. Am J Surg. 1985; 144:1275–1276.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pitt HA, Me Fadden DW, Gadacz TR. Agents for gallstone dissolution. Am J Surg. 1987; 153:233–246.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Sonnenberg E, Hofmann AF, Neoptolemus J, et al. Gallstone dissolution with methyl tert-butyl ether via percutaneous cholecystostomy: success and caveats. Am J Surg. 1986; 146:865–867.

    Google Scholar 

Biliary Laser Lithotripsy

  1. Classen M, Demling L. Endoskopiche Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus choledochus. Deutsch Med Wochenschr. 1974; 99:496.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orii K, Nakahara A, Takase Y, et al. Choledocholithotomy by YAG laser with a choledochofiberscope: case report of two patients. Surgery. 1981; 90:120–122.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orii K, Ozaki A, Takase Y, et al. Lithotripsy of intrahepatic and choledochal stones with YAG laser. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 156:485–488.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen MF, Jan YY. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy. Br J Surg. 1990; 77:530–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ell C, Lux G, Hochberger J, et al. Laser lithotripsy of common duct stones. Gut. 1988; 29:746–751.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dayton M, Decker DL, McCleane R, et al. Copper vapor laser fragmentation of gallstones: in vitro measurement of wall heat transmission. J Surg Res. 1988; 45:90–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ell Ch, Hochberg J, Muller D, et al. Laser lithotripsy of gallstones by means of a pulsed neodymium-YAG laser: in vitro and animal experiments. Endoscopy. 1986; 18:92–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofmann R, Härtung R, Geissdorfer K, et al. Laser induced shock wave lithotripsy: biologic effects of nanosecond pulses. J Urol. 1988; 139:1077–1079.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ell C, Wondrazek F, Frank F, et al. Laser-induced shock wave lithotripsy of gallstones. Endoscopy. 1986; 18:95–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishioka NS, Levins PC, Murray SC, et al. Fragmentation of biliary calculi with tuneable dye lasers. Gastroenterology. 1987; 93:250–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teng P, Nishioka NS, Farinelli WA, et al. Microsecond-long flash photography of laser-induced ablation of biliary and urinary calculi. Lasers Surg Med. 1987; 7:394–397.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray A, Basu R, Fairclough PD, et al. Gallstone lithotripsy with the pulsed dye laser. In vitro studies. Br J Surg. 1989; 76:457–460.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Remine SG, Aritz TH, Setz SE, et al. Holmium laser (2.1 μm) for biliary stone dissolution and ductal tissue effects. Lasers Surg Med. 1988; 8:191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shi W, Papaioannou T, Daykhovsky L, et al. Fragmentation of biliary stones with a 308 nm excimer laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1990; 10:284–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strunge C, Brinkman R, Flemming G, et al. Interspersion of fragment fiber splinters into tissue during pulsed alexandrite laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 1991; 11:183–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Birkett DH, Lamont JS, O’Keane JC, et al. Comparison of a pulsed dye laser and electrohydraulic lithotripsy on porcine gallbladder and common duct in vitro. Lasers Surg Med. 1991; 12:210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Birkett DH. Technique of cholangiography and cystic duct choledochoscopy at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for laser lithotripsy. Surgical Endose. 1992; 6:252–254.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson SL, Mueller PR, Lee MJ, et al. Treatment of bile duct stones by laser lithotripsy: results in 12 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158:1007–1009.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Josephs LG, Birkett DH. Laser lithotripsy for the management of retained common duct stones. Arch Surg. 1992; 127:603–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Valette PJ, Henry L, Chavaillon A, Thieulin F. Pulsed dye laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100(6):1730–1736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lux G, Ell C, Hochberger J, et al. The first successful endoscopic retrograde laser lithotripsy of common bile duct stones in man using a pulsed neodymium-YAG laser. Endoscopy. 1986; 18:144–145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cotton PB, Kozarek RA, Schapiro RH, et al. Endoscopic laser lithotripsy of large bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 1991; 99:1128–33.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sullivan KL, Bagley DH Jr, Gordon SJ, et al. Transhepatic laser lithotripsy of choledocholithiasis: initial clinical experience. J Vase Interv Radiol. 1991; 2:387–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brambs HJ, Rieber A, Huppert PE, et al. Perkutan-transhepatische cholangioskopische Farbstofflaser-Lithotripsie von Gallengangssteinen. Z Gastroenterol. 1992; 30:748–751.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Birkett DH. Biliary laser lithotripsy. Surg Clin North Am. 1992; 72:641–654.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carroll B, Chandra M, Papaioannou T, et al. Biliary lithotripsy as an adjunct to laparoscopic common bile duct stone extraction. Surg Endosc. 1993; 7:356–359.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones

  1. Traverso LW. Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1976; 132:81–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haff RC, Butcher HR, Ballinger WF. Biliary tract operation: a review of 1000 patients. Arch Surg. 1969; 98:428–434.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sivak MV. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:228–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cotton PB. Endoscopic management of bile duct stones (apples and oranges). Gut. 1984; 25:587–597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endose. 1991; 37:383–393.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kullman E, Borch K, Liedberg G. Long-term follow-up after endoscopic management of retained and recurrent common duct stones. Acta Chir Scand. 1989; 155:395–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawes RH, Coton PB, Vallon AG. Follow-up 6–11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98: 1008–1012.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moody FG. Lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary stones. Am J Surg. 1993; 165:479–482.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonnel DH, Liguory CE, Cornud FE, et al. Common bile duct and intrahepatic stones: results of transhepatic electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 50 patients. Radiology. 1991; 180: 345–348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen MF, Jan YY. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy. Br J Surg. 1990; 77:530–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauerbruch T, Delius M, Paumgartner G, et al. Fragmentation of gallstones by extracorporeal shock waves. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314:818–822.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moody FG, Amerson JR, Berci G, et al. Lithotripsy for bile duct stones. Am J Surg. 1989; 158:241–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Sackmann M, et al. Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a five-year experience. Hepatology. 1992; 15:208–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. den Toom R, Nijs HG, van Blankenstien M, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment of common bile duct stones: experience with two different lithotripters at a single institution. Br J Surg. 1991; 78:809–813.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weber J, Adamek HE, Riemann JF. Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991; 86:196–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sauerbruch T, Stern M. Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock waves: a new approach to biliary calculi after failure of routine endoscopic measures. Gastroenterology. 1989; 96:146–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller BM, Kozarek RA, Ryan JA Jr, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:135–141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwab G, Pointer R, Wetscher G, et al. Treatment of calculi of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175:115–120.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tompkins RK, Pitt HA. Surgical management of benign lesions of the biliary ducts. Curr Prob Surg. 1982; 19:321–400.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitt HA. Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg. 1993; 165:483–486.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Girard RM, LeGros G. Retained and recurrent bile duct stones: surgical or nonsurgical removal? Ann Surg. 1981; 193:150–154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Radiologic Management of Biliary Stone Disease

  1. Burrell MI, Zeman RK, Simeone JF, et al. The biliary tract: imaging for the 1990s. AJR. 1991; 157:223–233.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Sanchez RL, et al. Percutaneous intraluminal ultrasound in the gallbladder and bile ducts. Radiology. 1992; 182:693–696.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hofmann AF, Schteingart CD, vanSonnenberg E, et al. Contact dissolution of cholesterol gallstones with organic solvents. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 1991; 20:183–199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodacre B, vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino H, et al. Interventional radiology in gallstone disease. Gastroenterology Clin N Am. 1991; 20:209–227.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Casola G, et al. Gallbladder perforation and bile leakage: percutaneous treatment. Radiol. 1991; 178:687–689.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Casola G, et al. The benefits of percutaneous cholecystostomy for decompression of selected cases of obstructive jaundice. Radiology. 1990; 176:15–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabrera O, vanSonnenberg E, Wittich GR. Percutaneous diagnosis and therapy of biliary clonorchis sinensis. J of Interventional Radiol. 1988; 3(1):23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Hofmann AF, et al. Percutaneous dissolution of gallstones. Seminars in Roentgenology. 1991; 26:251–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. vanSonnenberg E, Zakko S, Hofmann AF, et al. Human gallbladder morphology after gallstone dissolution with methyl-tert-butyl ether. Gastroenterology. 1991; 100:1718–1723.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Zakko SF, et al. Gallbladder and bile duct stones: percutaneous therapy with primary MTBE dissolution and mechanical methods. Radiology. 1988; 169:505–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Cubberley DA, et al. Oriental cholangiohepatitis: diagnostic imaging and interventional management. AJR. February 1986; 146:327–331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Easter DW, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 21 patients: coordinated radiologic and surgical management. Radiology. 1993; 188:399–404.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christensen RA, vanSonnenberg E, Nemcek AA Jr, et al. Inadvertent ligation of the aberrant right hepatic duct at cholecystectomy: radiologic diagnosis and therapy. Radiology. 1992; 183:549–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Wittich GR, et al. The role of interventional radiology for complications of cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1990; 107:632–638.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berci, G. et al. (1995). Management of Common Bile Duct Stones. In: Arregui, M.E., Fitzgibbons, R.J., Katkhouda, N., McKernan, J.B., Reich, H. (eds) Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2480-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2480-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7555-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2480-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics