Vaginal Prolapse and Bladder Suspension: Role of Endoscopic Surgery

  • C. Y. Liu
Part of the Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology book series (CPOG)

Abstract

The goal of laparoscopic treatment for vaginal prolapse and bladder suspension is to restore normal anatomy by repairing pelvic floor defects. When a defect in the pelvic support system is of such magnitude that it requires the patient to undergo reparative surgery for symptomatic enterocele, rectocele, cystocele, urinary or fecal incontinence, or uterovaginal or rectal prolapse, the defect in the pelvic floor usually involves other components as well. Therefore surgery for vaginal prolapse, urinary incontinence, or any other pelvic floor defect must not be thought of as an isolated procedure. Restorative surgery for urinary continence, for example, changes the direction of force vectors to the remaining pelvic floor so a slight deficiency in another compartment existing at the time of the urinary incontinence surgery may become a marked deficiency postoperatively, necessitating further surgery. Up to 28% of patients undergoing a Burch colposuspension develop middle or posterior compartment deficiency (or both) and subsequently manifest enterocele, rectocele, and vaginal vault prolapse, which require additional surgery.1

Keywords

Catheter Dexon Sponge Peri Compressibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wiskind AK, Creighton SM, Stanton SL: The incidence of prolapse after the Burch colposuspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Delancey JOL, Richardson AC: Anatomy of genital support. In Female Pelvic Floor Disorders: Investigation and Management, Benson TJ (ed). New York, Norton, 1992, p. 19.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nichols DH, Randall CL: Significance of restoration of normal vaginal depth and axis. Obstet Gynecol 1970; 36: 251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nichols DH, Randall CL: Vaginal Surgery ( 3rd ed ). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hertogs K, Stanton SL: Lateral bead-chain urethrocystography after successful and unsuccessful colposuspension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hertogs K, Stanton SL: Mechanism of urinary continence after colposuspension: barrier studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marshall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE: The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1949; 88: 509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burch JC: Cooper’s ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100: 764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanagho EA: Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol 1976; 116: 751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cardozo LD, Stanton SL, Williams JE: Detrusor instability following surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol 1979; 51: 204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moschcowitz AV: The pathogenesis, anatomy, and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1912; 15: 7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    St Lezin MA, Stoller ML: Surgical ureteral injuries. Urology 1991; 38: 497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Symmonds RE: Ureteral injuries associated with gynecological surgery: prevention and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1976; 19: 623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu CY: Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension: a review of 58 cases. J Reprod Med 1993; 38: 526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu CY, Paek WS: Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1993; 1: 31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Y. Liu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations