Subglandular Breast Augmentation: Submammary Approach
Following a decrease as a result of the plethora of negative characterizations of breast implants emanating from the media (and the FDA)1–3 since the late 1980s, the number of women requesting augmentation mammaplasty is again increasing. This renewed interest is based on the fact that the vast majority of patients having this procedure in the past have been satisfied with the outcome4–6 and that results from multiple well-designed studies continue to show no connection between breast implants and systemic illness.7,8 Because only saline filled inflatable implants (which can be inserted through incisions of minimal length) can be used at the present for primary augmentation mammaplasty, interest in application of endoscopic techniques has increased.
KeywordsEndoscopic Technique Breast Augmentation Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Soft Tissue Coverage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fisher JC. Breast implants under siege: An historical commentary. J Long Term Effects Med Implants 1992;1:243.Google Scholar
- 5.Survey from the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, Inc. Arlington Heights, IL.Google Scholar
- 8.Hochberg MC. The association of augmentation mammaplasty with systemic sclerosis: Results from a multicenter case-control study. Presented at the American College of Rheumatology, October 1994.Google Scholar
- 10.Eclund GW. Mammographie imaging of the aug-mentented breast. Adminis Radiol 1988;12:42.Google Scholar
- 16.Hester TR. The polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: Facts and fiction. Perspect Plast Surg 1988;2:135.Google Scholar
- 17.Hester et al. A five year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for the treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation, and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1988;15:569.Google Scholar