Advertisement

Congenital Myopathies

  • Antti Lamminen
  • Helena Pihko

Abstract

Congenital myopathies constitute a rare group of disorders characterized by hypotonia and generalized muscle weakness from birth and structural alterations of muscle fibers. The clinical presentation of congenital myopathies is very similar regardless of the pathological changes in the muscle. The severity of muscle weakness varies, but most often it is mild with a stable or slowly progressive clinical course. Congenital dislocation of hip can be present, and scoliosis, chest and foot deformities can develop. Facial weakness with a high arched palate is common. In severe cases, weakness of respiratory muscles can cause death in infancy or childhood. Exceptional cases have an adult onset and a progressive course. Cardiomyopathy has been described in isolated cases. Serum creatine kinase is normal or slightly elevated, and, like electromyography (EMG), is of very little help in establishing the diagnosis of congenital myopathies. Nerve conduction velocity is normal and EMG may show myopathic changes. Muscle biopsy with histochemical staining of cryostat sections and electronmicroscopic study is essential for the diagnosis of a congenital myopathy. Dystrophic or neurogenic changes are absent and accumulation of fat or increased amount of connective tissues is less typical than in the muscular dystrophies. The classification of congenital myopathies is based on structural changes—presence of cores, rods or myotubes—in the muscle. The majority of the pathological changes are not specific. More than one type of pathological change can be present in one biopsy and similar changes can be seen to a small extent in other conditions.1-3

Keywords

Muscular Dystrophy Spinal Muscular Atrophy Malignant Hyperthermia Extensor Digitorum Longus Muscle Chemical Shift Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fitzsimons RB, McLeod JG. Myopathy with pathological features of both centronuclear myopathy and multicore disease. J Neurol Sei 1982;57:395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fardeau M Congenital myopathies. In: Mastaglia FL, Walton Sir John, eds. Skeletal muscle pathology London: Churchill and Livingstone, 1983:161–203.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooke MH. Congenital (more or less) muscle disease. In: Brooke MH, ed. A clinician’s view on neuromuscular disorders, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1986: 340–380.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrne E, Blumberg PC, Hallpike JF. Central core disease. Study of a family with five affected generations. J Neurol Sei 1982;53:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shuaib A, Passuke RT, Brownell KW. Central core disease. Clinical features in 13 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1987; 66:389–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hann EA, Freemantle CJ, McCure JA, et al. Assignment of the gene for central core disease to chromosome 19. Hum Gent 1990;86:187–190.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulley JC, Kozman HM, Phillips A, et al. Refined genetic localization for central core disease. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:398–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heckmatt JZ, Sewry CA, Hodes D, Dubowitz V Congenital centronuclear (myotubular) myopathy A clinical, pathological and genetic study in eight children Brain 1985;108:941–964.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banker B. The congenital myopathies. In: Engel A, Banker B, eds. Myology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986: 1527–1581.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oldfors A, Kyllerman M, Wahlstrom J, et al. X-linked myotubular myopathy: clinical and pathological findings in a family. Clin Genet 1989;36:5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darnfors C, Larsson HE, Oldfors A, et al. X-linked myotubular myopathy: a linkage study. Clin Genet 1990; 37:335–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehesjoki AE, Sankila EM, Miao J, et al. X-linked neonatal myotubular myopathy: one recombination detected with four polymorphic DNA markers from Xq28. J Med Genet 1990;27:288–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas NS, Williams H, Cole G, et al. X-linked neonatal centronuclear/myotubular myopathy: evidence for linkage to Xq28 DNA marker loci. J Med Genet 1990;27:284–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarnat HB Myotubular myopathy: arrest of morphogenesis of myofibres associated with persistence of fetal vimentin and desmin. Four cases compared with fetal and neonatal muscle Can J Neurol Sei 1990;17:109–123.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Misra AK, Menon NK, Mishra SK. Abnormal distribution of desmin and vimentin in myofibers in adult onset myotubular myopathy. Muscle Nerve 1992;15:1246–1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dubowitz V. Congenital myopathies. In: Dubowitz V, ed. Muscle biopsy: a practical approach, 2nd ed. London: Baillière Tindall, 1985:405–464.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wallgren-Pettersson C. Congenital nemaline myopathy. A clinical follow-up study of twelve patients. J Neurol Sei 1989;89:1–14.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laing NG, Majda BT, Akkari PA, et al. Assignment of a gene (NEMI) for autosomal dominant nemaline myopathy to chromosome 1. Am J Hum Genet 1992;50:576–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wallgren-Pettersson C, Sainio K, Salmi T. Electromyography in congenital nemaline myopathy. Muscle Nerve 1989;12:587–593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin JJ, Bruyland M, Busch HF, et al. Pleocore disease Multi-minicore disease and focal loss of cross striations Acta Neuropathol (Bed) 1986;72:142–149.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brooke MH. Congenital fiber type disproportion. In: Kakulas BA, ed. Clinical studies in myology. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1971:147–159.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clancy RR, Kelts KA, Oehlert JW. Clinical variability in congenital fiber type disproportion. J Neurol Sei 1980; 46:257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torres CF, Moxley RT. Early predictors of poor outcome in congenital fiber-type disproportion myopathy. Arch Neurol 1992;49:855–856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kyriakides T, Sillberstein J, Jongpiputvanich S, et al. The clinical significance of type 1 fiber predominance. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:418–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heckmatt JZ, Dubowitz V, Leeman S Detection of pathological change in dystrophic muscle with B-scan ultrasound imaging Lancet 1980;i: 1389–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heckmatt JZ, Leeman S, Dubowitz V. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease. J Paediatr 1982; 101: 656–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heckmatt JZ, Pier N, Dubowitz V. Real-time ultrasound imaging of muscles. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:56–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wallgren-Pettersson C, Kivi L, Jääskeläinen J, et al. Ultrasonography, CT, and MRI of muscles in congenital nemaline myopathy. Pediatr Neurol 1990;6:20–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bulcke JAL. Ultrasound and CT scanning in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disease. In: Gamstorp I, Sarnat HB, eds. Progressive spinal muscular atrophies. New York: Raven Press, 1984:153–161.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Arai Y, Sumida S, Osawa M, et al. Skeletal muscle CT scan and ultrasound imaging in two siblings with central core disease. No To Hattatsu 1990;22:55–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reimers CD, Müller W, Schmidt-Achert M, et al. Quantitative skeletal muscle sonography: a useful tool in differential diagnosis of generalized neuromuscular diseases In: Bondestam S, Alanen A, Jouppila P, eds. Euroson ’87 Proceedings Helsinki: Finnish Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 1987:241.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dock WD, Happak W, Grabenwöger F, et al. Neuromuscular diseases: evaluation with high-frequency sonography. Radiology 1990;177:825–828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lamminen A, Jääskeläinen J, Rapola J, Suramo I. High-frequency ultrasonography of skeletal muscle in children with neuromuscular disease. J Ultrasound Med 1988;7: 505–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    O’Doherty DS, Schellinger D, Raptopoulos V. Computed tomographic patterns of pseudohypertrophic muscular dystrophy: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977;1:482–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hawley RJ, Schellinger D, O’Doherty DS. Computed tomographic patterns of muscles in neuromuscular diseases. Arch Neurol 1984;41:383–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Termote J-L, Baert A, Crolla D, et al. Computed tomography of the normal and pathologic muscular system. Radiology 1980;137:439–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bulcke JAL, Baert AL. Clinical and radiological aspects of myopathies. Berlin: Springer, 1982.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lamminen AE. Magnetic resonance imaging of primary skeletal muscle disease: patterns of distribution and severity of involvement. Br J Radiol 1990;63:946–950.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maruyama T, Hanyu N, Maruyama K, et al. Clinical and pathological studies on two patients with adult-onset nem-aline myopathy. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1990;30:738–744.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Noda Y, Sakai K, Tojo M, et al. Nemaline myopathy of severe infantile type: a case report of a 9-year-old girl. No To Hattatsu 1990;22:82–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shimizu J, Matsumura K, Noguchi H. A case of severe infantile form of congenital nemaline myopathy with extensive fatty replacement of the skeletal muscles. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1990;30:1123–1127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Borghi L, Savoldi F, Scelsi R, Villa M. Nuclear magnetic resonance of protons in normal and pathological human muscles. Exp Neurol 1983;81:89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rodiek SO. Kernspintomographie der Skelettmuskulatur bei neuromuskulären Erkrankungen. RÖFO 1985; 143: 418–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fisher MR, Dooms CG, Hricak H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal and pathologic muscular system. Magn Reson Imaging 1986;4:491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kaiser WA, Schalke BCG, Rohkamm R. Kernspintomographie in der Diagnostik von Muskelerkrankungen. RÖFO 1986;145:195–205.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Matsumura K, Nakano I, Fukuda N, et al. Proton spin-lattice relaxation times of Duchenne dystrophy skeletal muscle by magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle Nerve 1988;11:97–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lamminen AE, Tanttu JI, Sepponen RE, et al. Magnetic resonance of diseased skeletal muscle: combined Tl measurement and chemical shift imaging. Br J Radiol 1990;63: 591–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murphy WA, Totty WG, Carroll JE. MRI of normal and pathologic skeletal muscle. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 565–574.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wallgren-Pettersson C, Rapola J, Donner M. Pathology of congenital nemaline myopathy. A follow-up study. J Neurol Sei 1988;83:243–257.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Udd B, Lamminen A, Somer H. Imaging findings reveal unexpected patchy lesions in late onset distal myopathy. Neuromuscul Disord 1991;1:279–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antti Lamminen
  • Helena Pihko

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations