Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology ((ABAB,volume 63-65))

Abstract

Lime (calcium hydroxide) was used as a pretreatment agent to enhance the enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass. After studying many conditions, the recommended pretreatment conditions are: time = 2 h, temperature = 100°C and 120°C, lime loading = 0.1 g Ca(OH)2/g dry biomass, water loading = 9 mL/g dry biomass. Studies on the effect of particle size indicate that there was little benefit of grinding below 20 mesh; even coarse particles (4–10 mesh) digested well. Using the recommended pretreatment conditions, the 3-d reducing sugar yield was five times that of untreated switchgrass, the 3-d total sugar (glucose + xylose) yield was seven times, the 3-d glucose yield was five times, and the 3-d xylose yield was 21 times. A material balance study showed that little glucan (approx 10%) was solubilized as a result of the lime pretreatment, whereas about 26% of xylan and 29% of lignin became solubilized.

Author to whom all correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klyosov, A. A. (1986), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 12, 249–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fan, L. T., Lee, Y.-H., and Gharpuray, M. M. (1982), Adv. Biochem. Eng. 23,157–187.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong, R., Engler, C. R. and Soltes, E. J. (1992), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, K. W., Ladisch, M. R., Schaefer, D. M., Noller, C. H., Lechtenberg, V., and Tsao, G. T. (1981), AIChE Symposium Series 207, vol. 77,102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, L. T., Gharpuray, M. M., and Lee, Y.-H., (1987), in Cellulose Hydrolysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, M. M., Chou, T. Y. C., and Tsao, G. T. (1982), Adv. Biochem. Eng. 20,15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weil, J., Westgate, P., Kohlmann, K., and Ladisch, M. R. (1994), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 16,1002–1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, M. G. (1977), Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2,105–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, D. C. and Ralston, A. T. (1973), J. Anim. Sci. 37, no. 1,148–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesoing, G., Klopfenstein, T., Rush, I., and Ward, J. (1981), J. Anim. Sci. 51, no. 2, 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clunningham, R. L. and Carr, M. E. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 14, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peters, M. S. and Timmerhaus, K. D. (1991), in Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, p. 816.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holtzapple, M. T., Jun, J.-H., Ashok, G., Patibandla, S. L., and Dale, B. E. (1991), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Holtzapple, M. T., Lundeen, J. E., Sturgis, R., Lewis, J. E., and Dale, B. E. (1992), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 34, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagwani, M. (1992), M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abou-Raya, A. K., Abou-Hussein, E. R. M., Ghoneim, A., Raafat, M. A., and Mohamed, A. A. (1964), J. Anim. Prod. U. A. R. 4, no. 1, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Waller, J. C. and Klopfenstein, T. (1975), J. Anim. Sci. 41, no. 1, 242–425 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Owen, E. and Nwadukwe, B. S. (1980), Anim. Prod. 30, 489 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Djajanegara, A., Molina, B. T., and Doyle, P. T. (1984), Anim. Feed Sci. Techno1.12,141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oliveros, B. A., Britton, R. A., and Klopfenstein, T. J. (1993), Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 44, 59–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gharib, F. H., Meiske, J. C., Goodrich, R. D., and Serafy, A. M. (1975), J. Anim. Sci. 40, no. 4, 734–742.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rounds, W., Klopfenstein, T., Waller, J., and Messersmith, T. (1976), J. Anim. Sci. 43, no. 2,478–482.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkinson, J. M. and Santillana, R. G. (1978), Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 3,117–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Paterson, J. A., Stock, A. R., and Klopfenstein, T. J. (1980), in Calcium Hydroxide Treatment of Crop Residues,Nebraska Beef Cattle Rep., EC 80–218, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibrahim, M. N. M. and Pearce, G. R. (1983), Agricultural Wastes 5,135–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Playne, M. J. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 426–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Winugroho, M., Ibrahim, M. N. M., and Pearce, G. R. (1984), Agricultural Wastes 9, 87–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Owen, E., Klopfenstein, T., and Urio, N. A. (1984), in Straw and Other Fibrous By-products as Feed,Sundstøl, F. and Owen, E., eds., Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 248–275.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Felix, A., Hill, R. A., and Diarra, B. (1990), Anim. Prod. 51, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohlenbrock, R. H. (1973), in The Illustrated Flora of Illinois: Grasses Panicum to Danthonia, Feffer & Simons, Inc., London and Armsterdam, pp. 67, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gould, F. W. (1968), in Grass Systematics, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chemical Analysis & Testing Standard Procedure,National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, G. L. (1959), Anal. Chem. 31, 426–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Holtzapple, M. T., Ripley, E. P., and Nikolaou, M. (1994), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 1122–1131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burr, B., Chang, V. S., Holtzapple, M. T., and Davidson, R. (1996), in Development of Alternative Pretreatment and Biomass Fractionation Processes: Lime Pretreatment, Final Report, Part II, Subcontract XAW-3–11181–03, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Humana Press Inc

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, V.S., Burr, B., Holtzapple, M.T. (1997). Lime Pretreatment of Switchgrass. In: Davison, B.H., Wyman, C.E., Finkelstein, M. (eds) Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol 63-65. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2312-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2312-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7497-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2312-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics