Skip to main content

Contraceptive Needs and Options in Perimenopausal Women

  • Chapter
Perimenopause

Part of the book series: Serono Symposia USA ((SERONOSYMP))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

How we approach contraception in today’s perimenopausal woman is drastically different from the approach of even 10 years ago, because the needs and options for this age group have changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Advance report of final natality statistics, 1991. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 1993;42(3).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Taffel SM, Mathews TJ, Clarke CS. Advance report of final natality statistics, 1992. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 1994;43(5):1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 1994 Ortho Annual Birth Control Study. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, Raritan, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mischell DR Jr. Noncontraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives. J Reprod Med 1993;38(suppl):1021.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Combination oral contraceptive use and the risk of endometrial cancer. JAMA 1987;257:796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The reduction in risk of ovarian cancer associated with oral-contraceptive use. N Engl J Med 1987;316:650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peipert JF, Gutmann J. Oral contraceptive risk assessment: a survey of 247 educated women. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Connell EB. Rational use of oral contraceptives in the perimenopausal woman. J Reprod Med 1993;38(suppl):136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stergachis A, Shy KK, Grothaus LC, et al. Tubal sterilization and the long-term risk of hysterectomy. JAMA 1990;264(22):2893–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rulin MC, Davidson AR, Philliber SG, Graves WL, Cushman LF. Long-term effect of tubal sterilization on menstrual indices and pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(1):118–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ParaGard (Intrauterine Copper Contraceptive) Model T380A, Prescribing Information, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harlap S, Kost K, Forrest JD. Preventing pregnancy, protecting health: a new look at birth control choices in the United States. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sivin I. Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1992;78:291.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farley TMM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, et al. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 1992;339:785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarez F, Brache V, Fernandez E, et al. New insights on the mode of action of intrauterine contraceptive devices in women. Fertil Steril 1988;49:768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Segal SJ, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Adejuwon CA, et al. Absence of chorionic gonadotropin in sera of women who use intrauterine devices. Fertil Steril 1985;44:214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Darney PD, Atkinson E, Tanner S, et al. Acceptance and perceptions of Norplant among users in San Francisco, USA. Stud Fam Plann 1990;21:152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Connell EB. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: clinical experience in the United States. Fem Pat, 1994;19:91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cundy T, Evans M, Roberts H, et al. Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Br Med J 1991;303:13–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Swartz DB, Wingo PA, Antarsh L, Smith JC. Female sterilizations in the United States, 1987. Fam Plann Perspect 1989;21:209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Escobedo LG, Peterson HB, Grubb GS, Franks AL. Case-fatality rates for tubal sterilization in U.S. hospitals, 1979 to 1980. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sulak, P.J. (1997). Contraceptive Needs and Options in Perimenopausal Women. In: Lobo, R.A. (eds) Perimenopause. Serono Symposia USA. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2288-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2288-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7488-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2288-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics