Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

The capability index C pk for a process, that produces parts with normally distributed characteristic X, is defined as C pk = min(Uµ, µL)/(3σ) = (T - ∣µv∣)/(3σ), where U and L are upper and lower specification limits for X, µ and σ are process mean and standard deviation, and v = (U + L)/2, T = (UL)/2. Using a sample X 1,…, X n of independent observations from N(µ, σ 2) Chou et al. (1990) [with clarification by Kushler and Hurley (1992)] showed how to get lower confidence bounds for C pk . Here we extend this methodology to cover the situation where samples come in batches and the intra batch correlation reduces the amount of independent information. In parallel we also apply this extension to the closely related tolerance bounds or confidence bounds for quantiles. Introducing the simple trick of effective sample size these problems are linked quite successfully to existing tables for tolerance bounds or C pk confidence bounds. The basic idea is to “approximate” the complicated data situation with an i.i.d. scenario with reduced overall sample size. The approximation is anchored by analysis to the two extreme situations where the within batch correlation is zero or one. For the in-between cases the effective sample size is chosen on a simple heuristic basis, namely by matching the variances of the sample mean under the batch effect model and its i.i.d. approximation. The coverage properties of the resulting method, examined by simulation, were found to be reasonably accurate near the extreme cases and mildly conservative in-between.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chou, Y. M., Owen, D. B. and Borego, S. A. (1990). Lower confidence limits on process capability indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher, L. and Van Belle, G. (1993). Biostatistics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jennett, W. J. and Welch, B. L. (1939). The control of proportion defective as judged by a single quality characteristic varying on a continuous scale, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-Supplement, 6, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, N. L. and Welch, B. L. (1940). Applications of the noncentral t-distribution, Biometrika, 31, 362–389.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 18, 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotz, S. and Johnson, N. L. (1993). Process Capability Indices, London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kushler, R. and Hurley, P. (1992). Confidence bounds for capability indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 24, 188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mee, R. W. and Owen, D. B. (1983). Improved factors for one-sided tolerance limits for balanced one-way ANOVA random model, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 901–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Odeh, R. E. and Owen, D. B. (1980). Tables for Normal Tolerance Limits, Sampling Plans, and Screening, New York: Marcel Dekker.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen, D. B. (1968). A survey of properties and applications of the non-central t-distribution, Technometrics, 10, 445–478.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Owen, D. B. (1985). Noncentral t-distribution, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 6, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seeger, P. and Thorsson, U. (1972). Two-sided tolerance limits with two-stage sampling from normal populations — Monte Carlo studies of the distribution of coverages, Applied Statistics, 22, 292–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Skinner, C. J., Holt, D. and Smith, T. M. F. (Eds.) (1989). Analysis of Complex Surveys, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Vangel, M. G. (1995). Design allowables from regression models using data from several batches, Composite Materials: Testing and Design, Twelfth Volume (Eds., R. B. Deo and C. R. Saff), pp. 358–370, ASTM STP 1274, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scholz, F., Vangel, M. (1998). Tolerance Bounds and Cpk Confidence Bounds Under Batch Effects. In: Kahle, W., von Collani, E., Franz, J., Jensen, U. (eds) Advances in Stochastic Models for Reliability, Quality and Safety. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2234-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2234-7_24

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2234-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics