Predictions and Projections of Pine Productivity and Hydrology in Response to Climate Change Across the Southern United States

  • Steven G. McNulty
  • James M. Vose
  • Wayne T. Swank
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 128)


The southeastern United States is one of the most rapidly growing human population regions in continental United States, and as the population increases, the demand for commercial, industrial, and residential water will also increase (USWRC, 1978). Forest species type, stand age, and the climate all influence the amount of water use and yield from these areas (Swank et al., 1988). Because forests cover approximately 55% of the southern United States land area (Flather et al., 1989), changes in water use by forests could significantly change water yields and potentially lead to water shortages within the region. Hence, estimates of future water supply from forested areas are needed and this will require a model that can accurately predict potential change in forest wateruse at the regional scale.


Geographic Information System United States Geologic Survey Basal Area Growth United Kingdom Meteorological Office Forest Species Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aber JD, Federer CA (1992) A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, ET and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecologia 92:463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Federer CA, Reich PB, Goulden ML, Kicklighter DW, Melillo JM, R Lathrop (1995) Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern U.S. Climate Res 5:207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooter EJ, Eder BK, LeDuc SK, and Truppi L (1993) General circulation model outputs for forest climate change research and application. USDA, For Ser, South For Exper Stat Gen Tech Rep SE-85, Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
  4. Daniel TW, Helms JA, Baker FS (1979) Principles of silviculture. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Dawdy DR, Lichty RW, Bergmann JM (1972) A rainfall-runoff simulation model for estimation of flood peaks for small drainage basins. USGS Prof Pap 506-B.Google Scholar
  6. Flather CH, Joyce LA, King RM (1989) Linking multiple resources analysis to land use and timber management: application and error considerations. USDA, For Ser, Pac Northw For Exper Stat, Gen Tech Rep PNW GTR-263.Google Scholar
  7. James LD (1972) Hydrologic modeling, parameter estimation, and watershed characteristics. J Hydrol 17:283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kramer PJ (1980) Drought, stress and the origin of adaptations. In Turner NC, Kramer PJ (Eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Magette WL, Shanholtz VO, Carr JC (1976) Estimating selected parameters for the Kentucky Watershed Model from watershed characteristics. Water Resour Res 12:472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marx DH (1988) Southern forest atlas project. In The 81st annual meeting of the association dedicated to air pollution control and hazardous waste management. APCA, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  11. McNulty SG, Vose JM, Swank WT, Aber JD, Federer CA (1994) Regional scale forest ecosystem modeling: Data base development, model predictions and validation using a geographic information system. Clim Res 4:223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McNulty SG, Vose JM, Swank WT (1997) Potential climate change affects on loblolly pine productivity and hydrology on four sites in the southern United States. Ambio: 25:449–453.Google Scholar
  13. McNulty SG, Vose JM, Swank WT (1996b) Loblolly pine hydrology and productivity across the southern United States. For Ecol Manage: 86:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McNulty SG, Vose JM, Swank WT (1996c) Prediction and validation of forest ecosystem processes at multi-spatial scales using a GIS. In Quattrochi DA, Goodchild MF (Eds) Scaling Of Remote Sensing Data For GIS. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.Google Scholar
  15. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B III, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melillo JM, Steudler PA, Aber JD, Bowden RD (1989) Atmospheric decomposition and nutrient cycling In Andreae MO, Schimel (Eds) Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Mitchell JFB (1989) The greenhouse effect and climate change. Rev Geophys 27(1): 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell MJ, David MB, Harrison RB (1989) Sulfur dynamics of forest ecosystems In Howarth RW, Stewart JWB (Eds) Sulfur Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystems and Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons New York.Google Scholar
  19. Moody DW, Chase EB, Aronson DA (1986) National water summary 1985 hydrologic events and surface-water resources. USGS water-supply paper 2300. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Nadelhoffer K, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1985) Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: A new hypothesis. Ecol 66:1377–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nikolov NT, Zeller KF (1992) A solar radiation algorithm for ecosystem dynamic models. Ecol Model 61:149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlesinger ME, Zhao ZC (1989) Seasonal climatic change introduced by doubled CO2 as simulated by the OSU atmospheric GCM/mixed-layer ocean model. J Climate 2:429–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strain BR, Higginbotham KO, Mulroy JC (1976) Temperature preconditioning and photo-synthetic capacity of Pinus taeda L. Photosyn 10:47–53.Google Scholar
  24. Swank WT, Swift LW Jr, Douglass JE (1988) Streamflow changes associated with forest cutting species conversions and natural disturbances. In Swank WT, Crossley DA Jr, (Eds) Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swift LW, Swank WT, Mankin JB, Luxmoore RJ, Goldstein RA (1975) Simulation of evapotranspiration and drainage from mature and clearcut decidious forests and young pine plantation. Wat Resour Res 11:667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teskey RO, Bongarten BC, Cregg BM, Dougherty PM, Hennessey TC (1987) Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pone (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 3:41–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. United States Geological Survey (1992) Regional hydrology and the USGS stream gaging network. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1.Google Scholar
  28. United States Water Resources Council (1978) The nation’s water resources, 1975–2000. Volume 1: Summary. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1.Google Scholar
  29. Whittaker RH, Marks PL (1975) Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In Lieth H, Whittaker RH (Eds) Primary production of the biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Zahner R, Saucier JR, Myers RK (1988) Tree-ring model interprets growth decline in natural stands of loblolly pine in the southeastern United States. Can J For Res 19:612–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven G. McNulty
  • James M. Vose
  • Wayne T. Swank

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations