Advertisement

Projections of Growth of Loblolly Pine Stands Under Elevated Temperatures and Carbon Dioxide

  • Harry T. Valentine
  • Timothy G. Gregoire
  • Harold E. Burkhart
  • David Y. Hollinger
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 128)

Abstract

Over the past 200 years, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere has increased from about 280 ppm (Neftel et al., 1991) to 360 ppm. An eventual doubling of the present-day ambient concentration along with increases in atmospheric concentrations of other greenhouse gasses are expected. Predictions that these higher concentrations will cause alterations in climates in many regions of the world have been widely disseminated by atmospheric physicists and others (e.g., Houghton et al., 1990). Tree physiologists have indicated that an increase in CO2, by itself, may foster faster growth and more efficient use of water by trees. Conversely, if the rise in CO2 is accompanied by an altered climate, gains that might otherwise accrue from CO2 fertilization could be either partially or entirely negated. Plant geographers have predicted changes in forest types in given regions under various climatic change scenerios, and concern has been voiced that if change is too rapid, some species will not be able to migrate fast enough to remain with those environmental conditions to which they are adapted.

Keywords

Palmer Drought Severity Index Maintenance Respiration Driving Variable Spacing Trial Average Tree Height 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amateis RL, Burkhart HE, Zedaker SM (1988) Experimental design and early analyses for a set of loblolly pine spacing trials. In Ek AR, Shifley SR, Burk TE (Eds) Forest Growth Modelling and Prediction, Vol 2. USDA For Ser, Northcen For Exper Sta, General Technical Report NC-120.Google Scholar
  2. Arp WJ (1991) Effects of source-sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 14:869–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowes G (1991) Growth at elevated CO2: photosynthetic responses mediated through rubisco. Plant Cell Environ 14:795–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck AL (1981) New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor. J Appl Meteor 20:1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell GS (1977) An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Conway TJ, Tans PP, Waterman LS (1991) Atmospheric CO2-modern record, Key Biscayne. In Boden TA, Sepanski RJ, Stoss FW (Eds) Trends ’91: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  7. Carter TR, Parry ML, Nishioka S, Harasawa H (1992) Preliminary Guidelines for Assessing Impacts of Climate Change. IPCC, The Environmental Change Unit, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Culotta, E (1995) Will plants benefit from high CO2? Science 268:654–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eamus D, Jarvis PG (1989) The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv Ecol Res 19:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Home AL (1993) The effects of shade on growth and carbon allocation in branches of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). PhD Dissertation, Yale Univ, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  11. Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (Eds) (1990) Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Jarvis PG (1989) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forests. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 324:369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarvis PG, Barton CVM, Dougherty PM, Teskey RO, Massheder JM (1990) MAESTRO. In Development and Use of Tree and Forest Response Models. State-of-Science/Technology Report 17, National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Kinerson RS, Higginbotham KO, Chapman RC (1974) The dynamics of foliage distribution within a forest canopy. J Appl Ecol 11:347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu S, Teskey RO (1995) Responses of foliar gas exchange to long-term elevated CO2 concentrations in mature loblolly pine trees. Tree Physiol 15:351–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Neftel A, Friedli H, Moor E, Lotscher H, Oeschger H, Siegenthaler U, Stauffer B (1991) Atmospheric CO2-historical record from ice cores, Siple Station. In Boden TA, Sepanski RJ, Stoss FW (Eds) Trends ’91: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  17. Norby RJ, Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD, O’Neil EG, McCracken MK (1992) Productivity and compensatory responses of yellow poplar trees in elevated CO2. Nature 357:322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer, W.C. (1965) Meteorological drought. US Weather Bureau, Res Pap No 45.Google Scholar
  19. Tolley LC, Strain BR (1984a) Effects of CO2 enrichment on growth of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus taeda seedlings under different irradiance levels. Can J For Res 14:343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tolley LC, Strain BR (1984b) Effects of CO2 enrichment and water stress on growth of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus taeda seedlings. Can J Bot 62:2135–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Valentine HT (1988) A carbon-balance model of stand growth: a derivation employing pipe-model theory and the self-thinning rule. Ann Bot 62:389–396.Google Scholar
  22. Valentine HT, Gregoire TG, Burkhart HE, Hollinger DY (1997). A stand-level model of carbon allocation and growth, calibrated for loblolly pine. Can J For Res 27:817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wullschleger SD, Norby RJ (1992) Respiratory cost of leaf growth and maintenance in white oak saplings exposed to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Can J For Res 22:1717–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry T. Valentine
  • Timothy G. Gregoire
  • Harold E. Burkhart
  • David Y. Hollinger

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations