Advertisement

MAESTRO Simulations of the Response of Loblolly Pine to Elevated Temperatures and Carbon Dioxide

  • Wendell P. CropperJr.
  • Kelly Peterson
  • Robert O. Teskey
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 128)

Abstract

An important tool in assessing the sensitivity of forests to global change is the simulation model of tree physiology. This tool must be used in conjunction with laboratory and field experiments. Population, ecosystem, and landscape-level models and analyses are also necessary to fully evaluate potential sensitivities to climate change. Physiological simulation models provide a unique method of exploring the complex nonlinear response surface of photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration, carbon allocation, and growth in trees. In principle this information could be obtained from controlled factorial experiments, however, a purely experimental approach would be extremely costly and time-consuming to implement for all of the species and regions of interest.

Keywords

Fine Root Stomatal Conductance Maintenance Respiration Crown Shape Project Leaf Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acock B, Allen LH Jr. (1985) Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. In Strain BR, Cure JD (Eds) Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. US DOE, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin VC Jr., Burkhart HE, Dougherty PM, and Teskey RO (1993) Using a growth and yield model (PTAEDA2) as a driver for a biological process model (MAESTRO). Research Paper SO-276, USDA, For Ser, South For Exper Sta New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  3. Breen PJ, Hesketh JD, Peters DB (1986) Field measurements of leaf photosynthesis of C3 and C4 species under high irradiance and enriched CO2. Photosyn 20:281–285.Google Scholar
  4. Burkhart HE, Farrar KD, Amateis RL, Daniels RF (1987) Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in loblolly pine plantations on cutover, site-prepared areas. FWS-1–87. VA Poly Inst State Univ, Sch For Wild Res, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
  5. Cropper WP Jr, Gholz HL (1991) In situ needle and fine root respiration in mature slash pine (Pinus elliottii) trees. Can J For Res 21:1589–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gholz HL, Vogel SA, Cropper WP Jr (1986) Organic matter dynamics of fine roots in plantations of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in north Florida. Can J For Res 16:529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grace J (1990) Modeling the interception of solar radiant energy and net photosynthesis. In Dixon RK, Meldahl RS, Ruark GA, Warren WG (Eds). Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Timber Press, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  8. Larcher W (1980) Physiological plant ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Rogers HH, Bingham GE, Cure JD, Smith JM, Surano KA (1983) Responses of selected plant species to elevated carbon dioxide in the field. J Environ Qual 12:569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryan MG (1991) Effects of climate change on plant respiration. Ecol Appl 1:157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ryan MG, Gower ST, Hubbard RM, Waring RH, Gholz HL, Cropper WP Jr. Running SW (1995) Woody tissue maintenance respiration of four conifers in contrasting climates. Oecologia 101:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stenberg P, Kuuluvainen T, Kellomaki S, Grace JC, Jokela EJ, and Gholz HL (1994) Crown structure, light interception and productivity of pine trees and stands. Ecol Bull 43:20–34.Google Scholar
  13. Strain BR (1985) Physiological and ecological controls on carbon sequestering in terrestrial ecosystems. Biogeochem 1:219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Teskey RO (1995) A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 on carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and leaf and branch growth of Pinus taeda trees. Plant Cell Environ 18:565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teskey RO, Fites JA, Samuelson LJ, Bongarten BC (1986) Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions. Tree Physiol 2:131–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang YP, Jarvis PG (1990a) Description and validation of an array model-MAESTRO. Agri For Met 51:257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang YP, Jarvis PG (1990b) Influence of crown structural properties on PAR absorption, photosynthesis, and transpiration in Sitka spruce: application of a model (MAESTRO). Tree Physiol 7:297–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang YP, Jarvis PG, Benson ML (1990) Two-dimensional needle area density distribution within crowns of Pinus radiata. For Ecol Manage 32:217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang YP, Jarvis PG, Taylor CMA (1991) PAR absorption and its relation to above-ground dry matter production of sitka spruce. J Appl Ecol 28:547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wullscheger SD, Ziska LH, Bunce JA (1994) Respiratory responses of higher plants to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Physiol Plant 90:221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yoder BJ, Ryan MG, Waring RH, Schoettle AW, Kaufmann MR (1994) Evidence of reduced photosynthetic rates in old trees. For Sci 40:513–527.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendell P. CropperJr.
  • Kelly Peterson
  • Robert O. Teskey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations