Advertisement

Ecophysiological Response of Managed Loblolly Pine to Changes in Stand Environment

  • Mary A. Sword
  • Jim L. Chambers
  • Dennis A. Gravatt
  • James D. Haywood
  • James P. Barnett
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 128)

Abstract

Anticipated shifts in our global climate may expose southern pine ecosystems to such environmental stimuli as elevated carbon dioxide and water and nutrient deficiencies (Hansen et al., 1988; Kirschbaum et al., 1990; Peters, 1990). Global climate change may also increase the degree of stress to which trees are presently exposed (Kirschbaum et al., 1990; Peters, 1990). For example, the western extent of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), now dictated by moisture availability for seedling establishment, is predicted to shift eastward with temperature and precipitation changes that may occur with global climate change (Miller et al., 1987).

Keywords

Fine Root Lateral Root Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density Fertilization Treatment Stem Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin VC, Feduccia DP (1987) Loblolly pine growth and yield prediction for managed west gulf plantations. US Dept Agric For Ser South For Exper Sta Gen Tech Rep SO-236.Google Scholar
  2. Comeau PG, Kimmins JP (1989) Above- and below-ground biomass production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes. Can J For Res 19:447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cregg BM, Hennessey TC, Dougherty PM (1990) Water relations of loblolly pine trees in southeastern Oklahoma following precommercial thinning. Can J For Res 20:1508–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickson RE (1986) Carbon fixation and distribution in young Populus trees. In Fujimori T, Whitehead D (Eds) Crown and canopy structure in relation to productivity. Forest and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan.Google Scholar
  5. Dickson RE (1989) Carbon and nitrogen allocation in trees. In Dreyer E, Aussenac G, Bonnett-Masimbert M, Dizengremel P, Favre JM, Garrec JP, Le Tacon F, Martin F (Eds) Forest tree physiology. Ann Sci For 46 (suppl), Elsevier and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  6. Dickson RE (1991) Assimilate distribution and storage. In Raghavendra, AS (Ed) Physiology of trees. John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Eissenstat DM, Van Rees KCJ (1994) The growth and function of pine roots. Ecol Bull 43:76–91.Google Scholar
  8. Ericsson A, Persson H (1980) Seasonal changes in starch reserves and growth of fine roots of 20-year-old scots pine. In Persson T (Ed) Structure and function of northern coniferous forests-An ecosystem study. Ecol Bull, Stockholm, Sweden, 32:239–250.Google Scholar
  9. Ford ED, Deans JD (1977) Growth of a sitka spruce plantation: Spatial distribution and seasonal fluctuation of lengths, weights and carbohydrate concentrations of fine roots. Plant and Soil 47:463–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gholz HL, Cropper WP Jr (1991) Carbohydrate dynamics in mature Pinus elliottii var. elliottii trees. Can J For Res 21:1742–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gower ST, Haynes BE, Fassnacht KS, Running SW, Hunt ER Jr (1993) Influence of fertilization on the allometric relations for two pines in contrasting environments. Can J For Res 23:1704–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gower ST, Vogt KA, Grier CC (1992) Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: Influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological monographs 62:43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grier CC, Vogt KA, Keyes MR, Edmonds RL (1981) Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can J For Res 11:155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen J, Fung I, Lacis A, Rind D, Lebedeff S, Ruedy R, Russel G (1988) Global climate changes as forecast by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model. J Geophys Res 93(D8):9341–9364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haynes BE, Gower ST (1995) Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol 15:317–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haywood JD (1994) Seasonal and cumulative loblolly pine development under two stand density and fertility levels through four growing seasons. US Dept Agric For Ser South For Exper Sta Res Paper SO-283.Google Scholar
  17. Haywood JD, Burton JD (1990) Phosphorus fertilizer, soil and site preparation influence loblolly pine productivity. New For 3:275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hipps NA, Pages L, Huguet JG, Serra V (1995) Influence of controlled water supply on shoot and root development of young peach trees. Tree Physiol 15:95–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson DW (1995) Role of carbon in the cycling of other nutrients in forested ecosystems. In McFee WW, Kelly JM (Eds) Carbon forms and functions in forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Incorporated, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  20. Kerr A Jr, Griffis BJ, Powell JW, Edwards JP, Venson RL, Long JK, Kilpatrick WW (1980) Soil survey of Rapides Parish Louisiana. US Dept Agric Soil Conserv Ser For Serv in cooperation with LA St Univ, LA Agric Exper Sta.Google Scholar
  21. Keyes MR, Grier CC (1981) Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can J For Res 11:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirschbaum MUF, Alvarez A, Cannell MGR, Cruz RV, Fischlin A, Galinski W, Odera JA, Xu D (1990) The impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems. In Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums, JJ (Eds) Climate change-The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Kozlowski TT, Kramer P J, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  24. MacFall JS, Johnson GA, Kramer PJ (1991) Comparative water uptake by roots of different ages in seedlings of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). New Phytol 119:551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marschner H (1986) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  26. McColl JG, Gressel N (1995) Forest soil organic matter: Characterization and modern methods of analysis. In McFee WW, Kelly JM (Eds) Carbon forms and functions in forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Incorporated, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  27. Miller WF, Dougherty PM, Switzer GL (1987) Effect of rising carbon dioxide and potential climate change on loblolly pine distribution, growth, survival and productivity. In Shands W E, Hoffman JS (Eds) The greenhouse effect, climate change, and U.S. Forests. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Peters RL (1990) Effects of global warming on forests. For Ecol Manage 35:13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pritchett WL, Gooding JW (1975) Fertilizer recommendations for pines in the southeastern coastal plain of the United States. Univ Fl Agric Exp Sta Bull 774.Google Scholar
  30. Russell RS, Clarkson DT (1976) Ion transport in root systems. In Sunderland N (Ed) Perspectives in experimental biology, volume 2, botany. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Santantonio D, Santantonio E (1987) Effects of thinning on production and mortality of fine roots in a Pinus radiata plantation on a fertile site in New Zealand. Can J For Res 17:919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shoulders E, Tiarks AE (1983) A continuous function design for fertilizer rate trials in young pine plantations. In Jones EP Jr (Ed) Proceedings of the second biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA For Ser, South For Exper Sta, Ashville, NC.Google Scholar
  33. Smith DM (1986) The practice of silviculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Teskey RO, Gholz HL, Cropper WP Jr (1994) Influence of climate and fertilization on net photosynthesis of mature slash pine. Tree Physiol 14:1215–1227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Teskey RO, Hinckley TM (1981) Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiol Plant 52:363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiarks AE (1982) Phosphorus sorption curves for evaluating phosphorus requirements of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Cleve K, Powers RF (1995) Soil carbon, soil formation, and ecosystem development. In McFee WW, Kelly JM (Eds) Carbon forms andfunctions in forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Incorporated, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  38. Van Rees KCJ, Comerford, NB (1990) The role of woody roots of slash pine seedlings in water and potassium absorption. Can J For Res 20:1183–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogt KA, Moore EE, Vogt DJ, Redlin MJ, Edmonds RL (1983) Conifer fine root and mycorrhizal root biomass within the forest floors of Douglas-fir stands of different ages and site productivities. Can J For Res 13:429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vogt KA, Publicover DA, Bloomfield J, Perez JM, Vogt DJ, Silver WL (1993) Below- ground responses as indicators of environmental change. Environ Exp Bot 33:189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Moore EE, Fatuga BA, Redlin MR, Edmonds RL (1987) Conifer and angiosperm fine-root biomass in relation to stand age and site productivity in Douglas-fir forests. J Ecol 75:857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vose JM (1988) Patterns of leaf area distribution within crowns of nitrogen-and phos-phorus-fertilized loblolly pine trees. For Sci 34:564–573.Google Scholar
  43. Vose JM, Allen HL (1988) Leaf area, stemwood growth, and nutrition relationships in loblolly pine. For Sci 34:547–563.Google Scholar
  44. Waring RH (1991) Responses of evergreen trees to multiple stresses. In Mooney HA, Winner WE, Pell EJ (Eds) Response of plants to multiple stresses. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  45. Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary A. Sword
  • Jim L. Chambers
  • Dennis A. Gravatt
  • James D. Haywood
  • James P. Barnett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations