Distraction of the Orbit

  • Barry L. Eppley
  • A. Michael Sadove

Abstract

Congenital anophthalmos/microphthalmos or early enucleation in the infant child removes the stimulation for subsequent development of the surrounding bones of the orbit (1–4). This has adverse growth effects with resultant decrease in all orbital dimensions. In addition, the growth disturbances may be transferred to the development of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and mandible depending on how early the eye is absent from the orbit during development (Figures 15A.1 and 15A.2) (1).

Keywords

Strabismus Bital Microphthalmias 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kennedy RE. Growth retardation and volume determinations of the anophthalmic orbit. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 70: 277, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Limborgh J, Tonneyck-Muller I. Orbital growth pattern in experimental microphthalmia. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 14: 1, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kennedy RE. The effect of early enucleation on the orbit in animals and humans. Trains Am Ophthalmol Soc 62: 459, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apt L, Isenberg S. Changes in orbital dimensions following enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 90: 393, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moss ML. Growth of the calvaria in the rat; the determination of osseous morphology. Am J Anat 94: 333, 1954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enlow D. Growth and architecture of the face. J Am Dent Assoc 82: 763, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirabayashi S, Harii K, Sakuria, Takaki EK, Fukuda O. An experimental study of craniofacial growth in a heterotopic rat head transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg 82: 236, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Price E, Simon JW, Calhoun JH. Prosthetic treatment of severe microphthalmos in infancy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 23: 22, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soll DB. Evolution and current concepts in the surgical treatment of the anophthalmic orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2: 163, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marchac D, Cophignon, J, Achard E, Dufourmentel C. Orbital expansion for anophthalmia and micro-orbitism. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 486, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tessier P, Rougier J, Hervouet F, Woillez M, Lekieffre M, Derome P. Microphthalmias and congenital anophthalmias. In: Plastic Surgery of the Orbit and Eyelids. Report of the French Society of Ophthalmology. New York: Masson Publishing; 1977: pp. 184–190.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Todd TW, Beecher H, Williams etal. The weight and growth of the human eyelball. Human Biol 12: 1, 1940.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomson WE. The determination of the influence of the eyeball on the growth of the orbit by experimental enucleation of one eye in young animals. Trans Opthalmol Soc (UK) 21: 258, 1901.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sarnat BG, Shanedling PD. Orbital volume following evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration in rabbits. Am J Ophthalmol 70: 787, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarnat BG, Shanedling PD. Orbital growth after evisceration or enucleation without or with implants. Acta Anat 82: 497, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taylor WOG. The effect of enucleation of one eye in childhood upon the subsequent development of the face. Trans Ophthalmol Soc (UK) 59: 361, 1939.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfeiffer RL. The effect of enucleation on the orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 49: 236, 1945.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osborne D, Harden OB, Deeming LW. Orbital growth after childhood enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol 77: 756, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lo AKM, Colcleugh RG, Allen L, Van Wyck LV, Bite U. The role of tissue expanders in an anophthalmic animals model. Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 399, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vistnes LM. The role of tissue expanders in an anophthalmic animal model (Discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 409, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buchman SR, Bartlett SP, Wormon III IL, Whitaker LA. The role of pressure on regulation of craniofacial bone growth. J Craniofac Surg 5: 2, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry L. Eppley
  • A. Michael Sadove

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations