Skip to main content

Abstract

Congenital anophthalmos/microphthalmos or early enucleation in the infant child removes the stimulation for subsequent development of the surrounding bones of the orbit (1–4). This has adverse growth effects with resultant decrease in all orbital dimensions. In addition, the growth disturbances may be transferred to the development of the zygomaticomaxillary complex and mandible depending on how early the eye is absent from the orbit during development (Figures 15A.1 and 15A.2) (1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kennedy RE. Growth retardation and volume determinations of the anophthalmic orbit. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 70: 277, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van Limborgh J, Tonneyck-Muller I. Orbital growth pattern in experimental microphthalmia. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 14: 1, 1975.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy RE. The effect of early enucleation on the orbit in animals and humans. Trains Am Ophthalmol Soc 62: 459, 1964.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Apt L, Isenberg S. Changes in orbital dimensions following enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 90: 393, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moss ML. Growth of the calvaria in the rat; the determination of osseous morphology. Am J Anat 94: 333, 1954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Enlow D. Growth and architecture of the face. J Am Dent Assoc 82: 763, 1971.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirabayashi S, Harii K, Sakuria, Takaki EK, Fukuda O. An experimental study of craniofacial growth in a heterotopic rat head transplant. Plast Reconstr Surg 82: 236, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Price E, Simon JW, Calhoun JH. Prosthetic treatment of severe microphthalmos in infancy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 23: 22, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soll DB. Evolution and current concepts in the surgical treatment of the anophthalmic orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2: 163, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchac D, Cophignon, J, Achard E, Dufourmentel C. Orbital expansion for anophthalmia and micro-orbitism. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 486, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tessier P, Rougier J, Hervouet F, Woillez M, Lekieffre M, Derome P. Microphthalmias and congenital anophthalmias. In: Plastic Surgery of the Orbit and Eyelids. Report of the French Society of Ophthalmology. New York: Masson Publishing; 1977: pp. 184–190.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Todd TW, Beecher H, Williams etal. The weight and growth of the human eyelball. Human Biol 12: 1, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomson WE. The determination of the influence of the eyeball on the growth of the orbit by experimental enucleation of one eye in young animals. Trans Opthalmol Soc (UK) 21: 258, 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sarnat BG, Shanedling PD. Orbital volume following evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration in rabbits. Am J Ophthalmol 70: 787, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarnat BG, Shanedling PD. Orbital growth after evisceration or enucleation without or with implants. Acta Anat 82: 497, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor WOG. The effect of enucleation of one eye in childhood upon the subsequent development of the face. Trans Ophthalmol Soc (UK) 59: 361, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeiffer RL. The effect of enucleation on the orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 49: 236, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osborne D, Harden OB, Deeming LW. Orbital growth after childhood enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol 77: 756, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo AKM, Colcleugh RG, Allen L, Van Wyck LV, Bite U. The role of tissue expanders in an anophthalmic animals model. Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 399, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vistnes LM. The role of tissue expanders in an anophthalmic animal model (Discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 409, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchman SR, Bartlett SP, Wormon III IL, Whitaker LA. The role of pressure on regulation of craniofacial bone growth. J Craniofac Surg 5: 2, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eppley, B.L., Sadove, A.M. (1999). Distraction of the Orbit. In: McCarthy, J.G. (eds) Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2140-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2140-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7429-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2140-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics