Skip to main content

Distraction of the Maxilla

  • Chapter

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis has become an accepted, and often preferred, technique for the reconstruction of deficient mandibles and has simplified the treatment of congenital mandibular hypoplasia (1–8). Laboratory studies have also demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of midface distraction (9, 10).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ilizarov GA. The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 48: 1, 1988.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karp NS, Thorne CH, McCarthy JG, Sissons HA. Bone lengthening in the craniofacial skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 24: 231, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy JG, Coccaro PJ, Schartz MD. Velopharyngeal function following maxillary advancement. Plast Reconstr Surg 64: 180, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCarthy JG, Schreiberg J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F. Extended indications for mandibular distraction: Unilateral, bilateral and bidirectional. Int Craniofacial Cong 5: 79, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Molina F. Mandibular distraction in hemifacial microsomia. Technique and results in 56 patients. The Craniofacial Society of Great Britain, 1994 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Molina F, Ortiz-Monasterio F. Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96: 825, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Brone EZ Jr. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 51: 506, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Staffenbery DA, Wood RJ, McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Glasberg SB. Midface distraction advancement in the canine without osteotomies. Ann Plast Surg 34: 512, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rachmiel A, Potparic Z, Jackson IT, Sugihara T, Clayman L, Topf JS. Midface avancement by gradual distraction. Br J Plast Surg 46: 201, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortiz Monasterio F, Rebeil AS, Valderrama M, Cruz R. Cephalometric measurements on adult patients with non-operated cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 24: 53, 1959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Molina, F., Figueroa, A.A. (1999). Distraction of the Maxilla. In: McCarthy, J.G. (eds) Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2140-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2140-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7429-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2140-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics