Skip to main content

Vicarious Liability

  • Chapter
Radiology and the Law

Abstract

An employer is vicariously liable for any tortuous acts committed by an employee within the scope of employment. Known legally as respondeat superior (literally, “let the person higher up answer”), the Latin term derives historically from the liability of a servant that was imputed to the master. In the contemporary medical setting, it refers to the liability relationships among staff physicians and nurses, technologists, and residents, or between hospitals and physicians. It is important to remember that staff radiologists may be held liable for the actions of their technologists or residents, even though their own conduct may have been completely blameless.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes

  1. Baker v. Story, 621 SW2d 639 (Tex App 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller RD, Hutton RC. Problems in Health Care Law, 8th ed. Gaithersburg (MD), Aspen, 2000, pg. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrovich v Share Health Plan, Lexis 148 (Ill App 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berlin L. Liability of radiologists when supervising technologists. AJR 1999; 172: 285–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berlin L. Liability of attending physicians when supervising residents. AJR 1998; 171: 295–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker v Story, 621 SW2d 639 (Tex App 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klein v Boyle et al, 776 F Supp 285 (West. Dis. VA 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCullough v Hutzel Hospital, 276 NW2d 569 (Mich App 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rouse v Pitt County Memorial Hospital et al, 470 SE2d 44 (NC 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berlin L. Liability of attending physicians when supervising residents. AJR 1998; 171: 295–298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spigos D, Freedy L, Mueller C. 24-hour coverage by attending physicians: a new paradigm. AJR 1996; 167: 1089–1090.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Steele RD, Kerr HH. 24-hour radiology. AJR 1997; 169: 953–954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berlin L. Liability of chairpersons when administering radiology departments. AJR 2000; 175: 967–972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maxwell v Cole, 482 NYS2d 1000 (NY 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klein v Boyle et al, 776 F Supp 285 (West. Dis. VA 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reuter SR. Professional liability in postgraduate medical education: who is liable for resident negligence? J Leg Med 1994; 15: 485–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berlin L. Liability of chairpersons when administering radiology departments. AJR 2000; 175: 967–972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmitz v St. Lukes Hospital et al (D.N.D. 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boumil MM, Elias CE. The Law of Medical Liability. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital, 105 NE 92 (NY 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bing v Thunig, 143 NE2d 3 (NY 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berlin L. Vicarious liability. AJR 1997; 169: 621–624.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Keene v Methodist Hospital 324 F. Suppl 231 (N.D. Ind. 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beeck v Tucson General Hospital 18 Ariz App. 165, 500 P.2d 1153 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller RD, Hutton RC. Problems in Health Care Law, 8th ed. Gaithersburg (MD), Aspen, 2000, pg. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jackson v Power, 743 P2d 1376 (Alaska 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marek v Professional Health Services, 432 A.2d 538 (NJ 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berlin L. Vicarious liability. AJR 1997; 169: 621–624.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miller RD, Hutton RC. Problems in Health Care Law, 8th ed. Gaithersburg (MD), Aspen, 2000, pgs. 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eisenberg, R.L. (2004). Vicarious Liability. In: Radiology and the Law. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2040-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2040-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-40309-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-2040-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics