Abstract
Yerushalmy’s pioneering work1 on observer variability in the interpretation of chest roentgenograms initiated a still-expanding interest in the evaluation of the diagnostic process. He introduced the terms sensitivity and specificity as measures of the validity of diagnostic tests, and an entire methodology including the concept of predictive value has developed in response to the geometric growth in and reliance on diagnostic testing in clinical practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Yerushalmy J. Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis with special reference to x-ray techniques. Public Health Rep 1947;62: 1432–1449
Foti AG, Cooper JF, Hershman H, Malvaez RR. Detection of prostatic cancer by solid-shape radioimmunoassay of serum prostatic acid phosphatase. New Engl J Med 1977;297:1357–1361
Gittes R. Acid phosphatase reappraised. New EnglJ Med 1977;297:1398–1399
Watson RA, Tang DB. The predictive value of prostatic acid phosphatase as a screening test for prostatic cancer. New Engl J Med 1980;303:497–499
Bayes T. An essay toward solving a problem in thedoctrine of chance. Philos Trans R Soc London 1763;53:370–418
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University. How to read a clinical journal. II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:703–710
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University. Interpretation of diagnostic data (six parts). Can Med Assoc J 1983;129: 429–432, 559-564, 587, 705-710, 832-835, 947-954, 1093-1099
Diagnostic tests. In: Kramer MS, ed. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 201–219
Feinstein AR. On the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Discrimination of Diagnostic Tests in Clinical Biostatistics. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1977;214–226
Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. New York: Wiley, 1975
Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AL, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of tests and procedures: principles and application. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94:557–592
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:389–391
Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. User’s guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703–707
McNeil BJ, Keeler E, Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. New Engl J Med 1975;293:211–215
Schechter MT, Sheps SB. Diagnostic testing revisited: pathways through uncertainty. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:755–760
Sheps SB, Schechter MT. The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research. JAMA 1984;252:2418–2422
Sox IIC Jr. Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:60–66
Vecchio TJ. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. New Engl J Med 1966; 274:1171–1173
Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1980
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schechter, M.T. (1998). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Value. In: Troidl, H., McKneally, M.F., Mulder, D.S., Wechsler, A.S., McPeek, B., Spitzer, W.O. (eds) Surgical Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_31
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7325-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1888-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive