Skip to main content

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Value

  • Chapter
Surgical Research

Abstract

Yerushalmy’s pioneering work1 on observer variability in the interpretation of chest roentgenograms initiated a still-expanding interest in the evaluation of the diagnostic process. He introduced the terms sensitivity and specificity as measures of the validity of diagnostic tests, and an entire methodology including the concept of predictive value has developed in response to the geometric growth in and reliance on diagnostic testing in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yerushalmy J. Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis with special reference to x-ray techniques. Public Health Rep 1947;62: 1432–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Foti AG, Cooper JF, Hershman H, Malvaez RR. Detection of prostatic cancer by solid-shape radioimmunoassay of serum prostatic acid phosphatase. New Engl J Med 1977;297:1357–1361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gittes R. Acid phosphatase reappraised. New EnglJ Med 1977;297:1398–1399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watson RA, Tang DB. The predictive value of prostatic acid phosphatase as a screening test for prostatic cancer. New Engl J Med 1980;303:497–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bayes T. An essay toward solving a problem in thedoctrine of chance. Philos Trans R Soc London 1763;53:370–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University. How to read a clinical journal. II. To learn about a diagnostic test. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:703–710

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University. Interpretation of diagnostic data (six parts). Can Med Assoc J 1983;129: 429–432, 559-564, 587, 705-710, 832-835, 947-954, 1093-1099

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diagnostic tests. In: Kramer MS, ed. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 201–219

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feinstein AR. On the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Discrimination of Diagnostic Tests in Clinical Biostatistics. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1977;214–226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and Efficiency of Medical Diagnoses. New York: Wiley, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  11. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AL, Greenland P. Selection and interpretation of tests and procedures: principles and application. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94:557–592

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:389–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. User’s guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McNeil BJ, Keeler E, Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. New Engl J Med 1975;293:211–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schechter MT, Sheps SB. Diagnostic testing revisited: pathways through uncertainty. Can Med Assoc J 1985;132:755–760

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheps SB, Schechter MT. The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research. JAMA 1984;252:2418–2422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sox IIC Jr. Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:60–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vecchio TJ. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. New Engl J Med 1966; 274:1171–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1980

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schechter, M.T. (1998). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Value. In: Troidl, H., McKneally, M.F., Mulder, D.S., Wechsler, A.S., McPeek, B., Spitzer, W.O. (eds) Surgical Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7325-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1888-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics