Writing a Scientific Paper

  • A. V. Pollock
  • M. Evans


Anybody who suggests that writing a scientific paper is easy has never written one. Even more bizarre is the belief that the gift of writing is given to some people and not to others, so if you don’t have the gift there is no point in trying hard. Both these statements are false. Be assured that to produce good scientific writing is always difficult. It always takes a long time, and it always needs revision after revision after revision. But you have done a nice bit of research, and you did not find that particularly easy or quick. No, you were meticulous in drawing up your protocol, following it, and analyzing your results. You must not be surprised that the writing up of those results is no easier than the research itself.


Scientific Paper Natural Killer Cell Activity Beta Carotene Biomedical Journal Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fleming A. On The Antibacterial Action of Cultures of a Penicillium, With special Reference to Their Use in The Isolation of B. Influenzae. Br J Exper Pathol 1929;10:226–236Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids. A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature 1953;4356:737–738Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lock SP. Structured Abstracts. Br Med J 1988; 297:156Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lock SP. How Editors Survive. Br Med J 1976; 3:1118–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill AB. The Reasons for Writing. Br Med J 1965; 2:626–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ad Hoc Working Group for Clinical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:598–604Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huth EJ. Structured Abstracts forc Papers reporting clinical Trials. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:626–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More Informative Abstracts Revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tufte ER. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics, 1983Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Condon RE. Type III error. Arch Surg 1986;121: 877–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Pollock
  • M. Evans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations