Skip to main content

Writing a Scientific Paper

  • Chapter
Surgical Research
  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

Anybody who suggests that writing a scientific paper is easy has never written one. Even more bizarre is the belief that the gift of writing is given to some people and not to others, so if you don’t have the gift there is no point in trying hard. Both these statements are false. Be assured that to produce good scientific writing is always difficult. It always takes a long time, and it always needs revision after revision after revision. But you have done a nice bit of research, and you did not find that particularly easy or quick. No, you were meticulous in drawing up your protocol, following it, and analyzing your results. You must not be surprised that the writing up of those results is no easier than the research itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fleming A. On The Antibacterial Action of Cultures of a Penicillium, With special Reference to Their Use in The Isolation of B. Influenzae. Br J Exper Pathol 1929;10:226–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids. A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature 1953;4356:737–738

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lock SP. Structured Abstracts. Br Med J 1988; 297:156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lock SP. How Editors Survive. Br Med J 1976; 3:1118–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill AB. The Reasons for Writing. Br Med J 1965; 2:626–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ad Hoc Working Group for Clinical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:598–604

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huth EJ. Structured Abstracts forc Papers reporting clinical Trials. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:626–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More Informative Abstracts Revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:69–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tufte ER. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  10. Condon RE. Type III error. Arch Surg 1986;121: 877–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollock, A.V., Evans, M. (1998). Writing a Scientific Paper. In: Troidl, H., McKneally, M.F., Mulder, D.S., Wechsler, A.S., McPeek, B., Spitzer, W.O. (eds) Surgical Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1888-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7325-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1888-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics