Skip to main content

Imaging the Reproductive Tract

  • Chapter
  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

Imaging the reproductive tract is indicated in numerous clinical situations, most commonly during an infertility evaluation. Several imaging modalities are available for the clinician to assess the reproductive tract, each with distinct advantages and disadvantages. Because plain radiography is currently of limited value for imaging the reproductive tract, the more common modalities used are ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bushong SC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical and Biological Principles, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer BM, Schlegel EA, Thueroff JW. MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of scrotal and testicular disease. Radiographics 1991; 11: 9–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Comiter CV, Benson CJ, Capelouto CC, et al. Nonpalpable intratesticular masses detected sonographically. J Urol 1995; 154: 1367–1369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lerner RM, Mevorach RA, Hulbert WC, et al. Color Doppler US in the evaluation of acute scrotal disease. Radiology 1990; 176: 355–358.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feld R, Middleton WD. Recent advances in sonography of the testis and scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 1033–1051.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zoeller G, Ringert RH. Color-coded duplex sonography for diagnosis of testicular torsion. J Urol 1992; 146: 1288–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilbert DM, Schaerfe CW, Stern WD, et al. Evaluation of the acute scrotum by color-coded Doppler ultrasonography. J Urol 1993; 149: 1475–1477.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkinson GO Jr, Patrick LE, Ball TI Jr, et al. The normal and abnormal scrotum in children: evaluation with color Doppler sonography. AJR 1992; 158: 613–617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen TD, Elder JS. Shortcomings of color Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of testicular torsion. J Urol 1995; 154: 1508–1510.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rifkin MD, Foy PM, Kurtz AB, et al. The role of diagnostic ultrasonography in varicocele evaluation. J Ultrasound Med 1983; 2: 271–275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meacham RB, Townsend RR, Rademacher D, et al. The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, gray scale sonography and color Doppler sonography. J Urol 1994; 151: 1535–1538.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eskew LA, Watson NE, Wolfman N, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of varicoceles. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 693–697.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maxwell AJ, Mamtora H. Sonographic appearance of epidermoid cyst of the testis. J Clin Ultrasound 1990; 18: 188–190.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamm B, Fobbe F, Loy V. Testicular cysts: differentiation with US and clinical findings. Radiology 1988; 168: 19–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Collings C, Cronan JJ, Grusmark J. Diffuse echoes within a simple hydrocele: an imaging caveat. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 439–442.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Janzen DL, Mathieson JR, Marsh JI, et al. Testicular microlithiasis: sonographic and clinical features. AJR 1992; 158: 1057–1060.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kessaris DN, Mellinger BC. Incidence and im plication of testicular microlithiasis detected by scrotal duplex sonography in a select group of infertile men. J Urol 1994; 152: 1560–1561.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Backus ML, Mack LA, Middleton WD, et al. Testicular microlithiasis: imaging appearances and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994; 192:781–785.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schnall MD, Pollack HM, Van Arsdalen K, et al. The seminal tract in patients with ejaculatory dysfunction: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. AJR 1992; 159: 337–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weintraub MP, De Mouy E, Hellstrom WJG. Newer modalities in the diagnosis and treatment of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol 1993; 150: 1150–1154.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carter SS, Shinohara K, Lipshultz LI. Transrectal ultrasonography in disorders of the seminal vesicles and ejaculatory ducts. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 773–790.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mellinger, B.C. (1997). Imaging the Reproductive Tract. In: Hellstrom, W.J.G. (eds) Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7310-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1848-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics