Skip to main content

Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Perils

  • Chapter
Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction

Abstract

Penile prosthetic implants have been available for a quarter century. Early in the 1970s paired semirigid devices and multicomponent inflatable implants were first reported in the medical literature.1–3 Initially, the malleable paired devices were much more popular with implanting surgeons because of lower cost, easier surgical implantation, and better mechanical reliability. The early inflatable devices were plagued with recurrent mechanical breakdown that necessitated multiple revision operations.4,5 Devices from several different companies have come and gone in the marketplace. The devices that remain have become remarkably dependable mechanically. In fact, some authorities believe the inflatable devices are now more mechanically reliable than the human factor.6 In fact, revision surgery may be more likely for hematoma, infection, patient dissatisfaction, or physician error than for mechanical breakdown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Morales PA, Suarez JB, Delgado J, et al. Penile implant for erectile impotence. J Urol 1973; 109: 641–643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology 1975; 5: 479481.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scott FB, Bradley WD, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence: use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1973; 2: 80–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph DB, Bruskewitz RC, Benson RC. Longterm evaluation of the inflatable penile prostheses. J Urol 1984; 131: 1670–1674.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson SK, Wahman GE, Lange JL. Eleven years’ experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1987; 139: 951–952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson SK. Current treatment of impotence with inflatable penile protheses examined. AUA Today 1992, Sept; 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golji H. Experience with penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1979; 121: 288–291.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rossier AB, Fam BA. Indication and results of semirigid penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients: long term follow up. J Urol 1984; 131: 59–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulcahy JJ, Krane RJ, Lloyd LK, et al. Duraphase penile prosthesis—results of clinical trials in 63 patients. J Urol 1990; 143: 518–520.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carson CC. Infections in genitourinary prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 139–147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson SK, Delk JR. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995; 153: 659–661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson SK, Cleves M, Delk JR. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent. J Urol 1996; 155: 1421–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson SK, Delk JR. Excessive periprosthetic capsule formation of the penile prosthesis reservoir: incidence in various prostheses and a simple surgical solution. J Urol 1995; 153: 358A.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baum N, Suarez G, Mobley D. Use of infrapubic incision for insertion of Mentor Mark II inflateable penile prosthesis. Urology 1992; 39: 436–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fallen MJ, Lewis RW. Experience with a twopiece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1990; 143: 409A.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Randrup E, Wilson S, Mobley D, et al. Clinical xperience with Mentor Alpha I inflatable penile prosthesis. Report on 333 cases. Urology 992; 42: 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson SK, Delk JR, Terry T. Improved implant uccess in patients with severe corporal fibrosis: a new technique without the necessity of grafting. J Urol 1995; 153: 359A.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knoll DL, Furlow WL, Benson RC, et al. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with use of downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1995; 153: 366–368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Furlow WL, Knoll LD, Benson RC. Penile lengthening and the new AMS 700 Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis. Int J Impotence Res 1992; 4(suppl 2):Al24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Montague DK, Lakin MM. Early experience ith the controlled girth and length expanding ylinder of the AMS Ultrex penile prosthesis. J Urol 1992; 148: 1444–1447.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson SK, Delk JR. The Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening-The S shaped deformity. J Urol 1994; 151: 354A.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Montague DK. Penile prostheses. In: Bennett H, ed. Impotence: Diagnosis and Management of Erectile Dysfunction. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1994: 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Long R, Lewis R. Actual outcome of the modern -piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 151: 354A.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williams CB. Out-patient implantation of mentor alpha-I inflatable penile prosthesis: results of 47 single surgeon cases. Int J Impotence Res1995; 6(suppl):A59.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment for eyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 152: 1121–1123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, S.K. (1997). Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Perils. In: Hellstrom, W.J.G. (eds) Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7310-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1848-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics