Abstract
Penile prosthetic implants have been available for a quarter century. Early in the 1970s paired semirigid devices and multicomponent inflatable implants were first reported in the medical literature.1–3 Initially, the malleable paired devices were much more popular with implanting surgeons because of lower cost, easier surgical implantation, and better mechanical reliability. The early inflatable devices were plagued with recurrent mechanical breakdown that necessitated multiple revision operations.4,5 Devices from several different companies have come and gone in the marketplace. The devices that remain have become remarkably dependable mechanically. In fact, some authorities believe the inflatable devices are now more mechanically reliable than the human factor.6 In fact, revision surgery may be more likely for hematoma, infection, patient dissatisfaction, or physician error than for mechanical breakdown.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Morales PA, Suarez JB, Delgado J, et al. Penile implant for erectile impotence. J Urol 1973; 109: 641–643.
Small MP, Carrion HM, Gordon JA. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology 1975; 5: 479481.
Scott FB, Bradley WD, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence: use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1973; 2: 80–84.
Joseph DB, Bruskewitz RC, Benson RC. Longterm evaluation of the inflatable penile prostheses. J Urol 1984; 131: 1670–1674.
Wilson SK, Wahman GE, Lange JL. Eleven years’ experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1987; 139: 951–952.
Wilson SK. Current treatment of impotence with inflatable penile protheses examined. AUA Today 1992, Sept; 1–4.
Golji H. Experience with penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol 1979; 121: 288–291.
Rossier AB, Fam BA. Indication and results of semirigid penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients: long term follow up. J Urol 1984; 131: 59–62.
Mulcahy JJ, Krane RJ, Lloyd LK, et al. Duraphase penile prosthesis—results of clinical trials in 63 patients. J Urol 1990; 143: 518–520.
Carson CC. Infections in genitourinary prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16: 139–147.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995; 153: 659–661.
Wilson SK, Cleves M, Delk JR. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent. J Urol 1996; 155: 1421–1423.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. Excessive periprosthetic capsule formation of the penile prosthesis reservoir: incidence in various prostheses and a simple surgical solution. J Urol 1995; 153: 358A.
Baum N, Suarez G, Mobley D. Use of infrapubic incision for insertion of Mentor Mark II inflateable penile prosthesis. Urology 1992; 39: 436–438.
Fallen MJ, Lewis RW. Experience with a twopiece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1990; 143: 409A.
Randrup E, Wilson S, Mobley D, et al. Clinical xperience with Mentor Alpha I inflatable penile prosthesis. Report on 333 cases. Urology 992; 42: 305–308.
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Terry T. Improved implant uccess in patients with severe corporal fibrosis: a new technique without the necessity of grafting. J Urol 1995; 153: 359A.
Knoll DL, Furlow WL, Benson RC, et al. Management of nondilatable cavernous fibrosis with use of downsized inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1995; 153: 366–368.
Furlow WL, Knoll LD, Benson RC. Penile lengthening and the new AMS 700 Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis. Int J Impotence Res 1992; 4(suppl 2):Al24.
Montague DK, Lakin MM. Early experience ith the controlled girth and length expanding ylinder of the AMS Ultrex penile prosthesis. J Urol 1992; 148: 1444–1447.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. The Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening-The S shaped deformity. J Urol 1994; 151: 354A.
Montague DK. Penile prostheses. In: Bennett H, ed. Impotence: Diagnosis and Management of Erectile Dysfunction. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1994: 271–295.
Long R, Lewis R. Actual outcome of the modern -piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 151: 354A.
Williams CB. Out-patient implantation of mentor alpha-I inflatable penile prosthesis: results of 47 single surgeon cases. Int J Impotence Res1995; 6(suppl):A59.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment for eyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994; 152: 1121–1123.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, S.K. (1997). Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Perils. In: Hellstrom, W.J.G. (eds) Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_40
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7310-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1848-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive