Skip to main content

The Normal Penis and Augmentation Surgery in Adult Males

  • Chapter
Book cover Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction
  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

Phallus dimension—as evidenced by the increasing number of men seeking penis enlargement—is a growing concern. Some men request penis enlargement for functional reasons; however, the majority seek it for aesthetic purposes to reinforce a sexual “macho” image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Danish RK, Lee PA, Mazur T, et al. Micropenis. II. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Johns Hopkins Med J 1980; 146: 177–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spaulding MH. The development of the external genitalia in human embryo. Embryol Carnegie Inst 1921; 143: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan SL, Brumbach NM, Aubert ML. The ontogenesis of pituitary hormones and hypothalamic factors in the human fetus: maturation of central nervous system regulation of anterior pituitary function. Recent Prog Horm Res 1976; 32: 161–172.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Breeza A, Aboseif S, Lea TF. Anatomy of the penis. In: Montague DK, ed. Atlas of the Urology Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1993: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devine CJ Jr, Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Walsh PC, Retic AB, Stamey TA, et al, eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992: 2957–3032.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tanagho EA. Anatomy of the lower urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al, eds. Campbell’s Urology, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992: 40–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol 1994; 152: 4–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee PA, Mazur T, Danish R, et al. Micropenis: I. Criteria, etiologies, and classification. Johns Hopkins Med J 1980; 146 /147: 156–163.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol 1942; 48: 759–777.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wessells H, Lue T, McAninch JW. The relationship between penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile lengthening? J Urol 1995; 153:374A, Abstr 582.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ros C, Telöken C, Sogari P, et al. Caucasian penis: what is the normal size? J Urol 1994; 151: 323A.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masters WH, Johnson VE. The penis. In: Human Sexual Response. Boston: Little, Brown; 1996: 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crawford BS. Buried penis. Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30: 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rivard DJ. Anatomy, physiology, and neuro-physiology of male sexual function. In: Bennett AH, ed. Management of Male Impotence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1982: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. Exstrophy of the bladder, epispadias, and other bladder anomalies. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al, eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992: 1772–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Devine CJ Jr, Jordan GH, Schlossberg SM. Surgery of the penis and urethra. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al, eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1992: 2957–3032.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alter GJ. Augmentation phalloplasty. In: Melman A, ed. Urological Clinics of North America. Philadelphia, PA; W.B. Saunders Co. 1995; 4: 887–902.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roos H, Lissoos I. Penis lengthening. Int J Aesthetic Restorative Surg 1994; 2: 89.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Long DC. Elongation of the penis. Chung Hua Cheng Hsing Shoa Shang Wai Ko Tsa Chih 1990; 6: 17–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alter GJ. Penis enhancement. A UA Update Series 1996; 15: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burkholder GV, Newell ME. New surgical treatment for micropenis. J Urol 1983; 129: 832–834.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Telöken, C. (1997). The Normal Penis and Augmentation Surgery in Adult Males. In: Hellstrom, W.J.G. (eds) Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1848-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7310-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1848-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics