Skip to main content

Cognitive Interpretation of Visual Signals

  • Chapter

Abstract

How we see, and how we know what we see, are conundrums that have perplexed scientists for decades and intrigued philosophers for centuries. In pre-Socratic times, philosophers attempted to separate interactions with the external world into those that involve the human senses and those that do not involve the senses directly. The theory of Empedocles, typical of the reasoning employed by several early philosophers, suggested that the senses are affected by tiny, particle-like effluences emitted by objects. As the effluences strike the body, they lodge in one set of pores or another depending on their exact size and configuration. Each set of pores gives rise to a particular sensation experienced by the observer. For a stone to be seen as a gray, round object, its effluences would have to be captured by the pores that characterize gray, round objects. These pores are located in the eyes, because the object is seen. Objects that are heard emit effluences that are captured by the ears, and effluences that are captured by the nose give rise to the sensation of smell.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes J. Perception: Early Greek theories. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987:603–604.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes J. Aristotle. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press: 1987;38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scruton R. Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press: 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Locke J. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). Nidditch PH., ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newton I. Opticks (4th ed., 1704). London: Smith and Walford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker R.C.S. Leibniz’s philosophy of mind. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press: 1987; 433–434.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berkeley G. An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (1709). New York: C.P. Dutton;1910.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason (1929, trans. Kemp Smith N.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Price H. Hume’s Theory of the External World. Oxford: Clarendon; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Helmholtz H. Handbook de Physiologischen Optik (Part I, 1856; Part II, 1860; Part III, 1866. Leipzig: Voss. 1925, trans. Southall G.). New York: Dover; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory R.L. Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson J.J. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohler W. Gestalt Psychology (1929). New York: Liveright; 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marr D. Vision. New York: Freeman; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory R.L. The Intelligent Eye. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rock I. Perception. New York: Scientific American Library; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeki S. The visual image in mind and brain. Sci. Amer., 1992; 267:68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marroquin J.L. Human Visual Perception of Structure (M.Sc. thesis; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science). Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Julesz B. Vision: The early warning system. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford-Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987: 346.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mackworth N.H. Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In: R.A. Monty and J.W. Sender, eds., Eye Movements and Psychological Processes. New York: Wiley; 1976:307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bellemy L.J., Courtney A.J. Development of a search task for the measurement of peripheral visual acuity. Ergonomics; 1981, 24:597–599.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sanders A.F. Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. Ergonomics; 1970, 13:101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature 1981; 290:91–97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandelbrot B.B. The fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: Freeman; 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen C.C., Daponte J.S., Fox AM.D. Fractal feature analysis and classification of medical imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., MI-8: 133–142; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cargill E.B., Donohoe K.J., Kolodny G., Parker A.J., Duane DP. Estimation of fractal dimension of parenchymal organs based on power spectral analysis in nuclear medicine scans. In: D.A. Ortendahl, J. Uacer (eds.), Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Inform. Proc. Med. Imag., 557–570; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Caldwell C.B., Stapleton S.J., Holdsworth D.W., Jong R.A., Weiser W.J., Cooke G. Characterization of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. Phy. Med. Biol, 1990; 35:235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nelson T.R., Manchester D.K. Modeling of lung morphogenesis using fractal geometries. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., MI-7:321–327; 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thurston J.B., Carraher R.G. Optical Illusions and the Visual Arts. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gregory R.L. Illusions, In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987:337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hendee W.R. The perception of visual information. Radiographics 1987; 7(6): 1213–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Escher M.C. The Graphic Work of MC Escher (2nd ed.). New York: Hawthorne Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Penrose R. Escher and the visual representation of mathematical idea. In: Coxeter H.S.M., Emner M., Penrose R., Teubre M.L., eds. M.C. Escher: Art and Science (2nd ed.). New York: North Holland; 1987: 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parks T.E. Illusory figures. In: Gregory R.L., ed. Oxford Companion to the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987:344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Descartes R. Meteores. Paris: 1638.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hooke R. Micrographia (reprint of 1665 ed.). New York: Dover; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Young T. On the theory of light and colors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 1802; 92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendee, W.R. (1997). Cognitive Interpretation of Visual Signals. In: Hendee, W.R., Wells, P.N.T. (eds) The Perception of Visual Information. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1836-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1836-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7306-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1836-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics