Cost Estimates and Sensitivity Analyses for the Ammonia Fiber Explosion Process

  • Lin Wang
  • Bruce E. Dale
  • Lale Yurttas
  • I. Goldwasser
Part of the Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology book series (ABAB)

Abstract

Process designs were conducted for each unit of the conceptual ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) process, and fixed capital investment and operating costs were estimated. AFEX costs about $20-40/t of dry biomass treated. Several promising areas for reducing process costs exist. Return on investment (ROI) calculations were also done for AFEX-treated materials (as digestibility-enhanced animal feeds), in conjunction with sensitivity analyses on the overall processing costs. Estimated ROIs range from over 100%/y to negative, depending on the system variables. The most important variables are the cost of corn and corn fiber, ammonia loading, and whether or not drying is required.

Index Entries

Biomass pretreatment cost estimation and economic analysis process design computer simulation ammonia fiber explosion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dale, B. E. and Moreira, M. J. (1982), Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium, 12, 31–43, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dale, B. E., Henk, L. L., and Shiang, M. (1985), Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 26, 223–233.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holtzapple, M. T., Jun, J. H., Ashok, G., Patibandla, S., and Dale, B. E. (1991), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 28/29, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dale, B. E. and Tsao, G. T. (1982), J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 27, 1233–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eubank, P. T. (1995), Personal Communication, Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byers, F. M. (1996), Personal Communication, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, P. Y., Bolker, H. I., and Purves, C. B. (1964), Can. J. Chem. 42, 2434–2456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulz, S. C. G. (1973), Progr. Refrig. Sci. Technol., Proc. Int. Congr. Refrig., 13th, 2, 431–446.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raghu, R. (1985), Chemical Process Computation, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perry, R. H. and Chilton, H. C. (1984), Chemical Engineer’s Handbook, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holtzapple, M. (1987), Ethanol Production Module No. 4, Texas A&M University, from Beaumont Birch Company.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peters, M. S. and Timmerhaus, K. D. (1979), Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feedstuffs, 67,42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Wang
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Dale
    • 2
  • Lale Yurttas
    • 1
  • I. Goldwasser
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations