Robust Reduced-Order Controller of Transitional Boundary Layers

  • L. Cortelezzi
  • J. L. Speyer
Part of the Progress in Systems and Control Theory book series (PSCT, volume 24)

Abstract

A framework to derive optimal and robust reduced-order controllers of transitional boundary layers using linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) design, or, in modem terms, H 2 design, is presented. As a test case, two-dimensional Poiseuille flow is considered. A controller based on a reduced model, 8% of the order of the full size system, is designed. Initial conditions creating transient growth of wall-shear stresses are constructed. The controller is tested on a 32 wave numbers simulation. Wall-shear stresses reduction, up to 90%, is obtained. The transferability of the controller to Navier-Stokes simulations and engineering applications is discussed.

Keywords

Attenuation Doyle Estima 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Gad-el-Hak. Interactive control of turbulent boundary layers — A futuristic overview, AIAA Journal, 32(9):1753 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H.L. Reed, W.S. Saric and D. Arnal. Linear stability theory applied to boundary layers, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 28:389, 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.W. Barnwell and M.Y. Hussaini. Natural laminar flow and laminar flow control, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.S. Joshi, J.L. Speyer and J. Kim. A systems theory approach to the feedback stabilization of infinitesimal and finite-amplitude disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow, J. Fluid Mech., 332:57, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.S. Joshi, J.L. Speyer and J. Kim. Modeling and control of two dimensional Poiseuille flow, Proc. 341h Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, Louisiana, 921, December 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H.H. Hu and H.H. Bau. Feedback control to delay or advance linear loss of stability in planar Poiseuille flow, Proc. Royal Soc. of London A, 447:299.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Zhou, J.C. Doyle and K. Glover. Robust and optimal control, Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Rhee and J.L. Speyer. A game theoretic approach to a finite-time disturbance attenuation problem, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 36(9):1021, 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C.M. Ho and Y.C. Tai. Review — MEMS and its applications for flow control, J. Fluids Eng. - Trans. AMSE, 118:437 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    B.F. Farrell, Optimal excitation of perturbations in viscous shear flows, Phys. Fluids, 31(8):2093, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Cortelezzi
    • 1
  • J. L. Speyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations