Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 133))

Abstract

The customary objective of a group sequential design is the comparison of several treatments or populations. The evolutionary nature of such trials encourages the use of the Bayesian paradigm in the design, monitoring and analysis of these trials. Here we focus on the design issue for the case of continuous, possibly multivariate response at each trial. Our approach is descriptive. Given a model specification, a design is characterized by a number of interim evaluations, the group size for each interim look, and a set of stopping criteria which determine our decision at a given look. By simulating replications of the design we can summarize design performance in terms of when the trial was stopped and reason for stopping. Such simulation and evaluation requires a fully Bayesian model specification for each treatment. We take a nonparametric perspective for the likelihood specification by assuming that the data is drawn from a distribution which arises through Dirichlet process mixing. However, we distinguish a sampling or “what if” prior, reflecting illustrative differences between populations, from a fitting or skeptical prior assuming no differences. By drawing trials under the sampling model, while fitting the model under the fitting prior, Bayesian learning moves us from prior indifference to detection of differences. We illustrate with two examples, one having univariate response, the other bivariate response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antoniak, C. E. (1974), “Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes with Applications to Nonparametric Problems”, The Annals of Statistics, 2, 1152–1174.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. A. (1993), “A Case for Bayesianisrn in Clinical Trials”, Statistics in Medicine, 12, 1377–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. A. and Ho, C. H. (1988), “One-Sided Sequential Boundaries for Clinical Trials: A Decision-Theoretic Approach”, Biometrics, 44, 219–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B. P., Kadane, J. B., and Gelfand, A. E. (1998), “Approaches for Optimal Sequential Decision Analysis in Clinical Trials”, Biometrics (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, M. D. and West, M. (1992), “Computing Bayesian Nonparametric Hierarchical Models”, Technical report, ISDS, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, M. D. and West, M. (1995), “Bayesian Density Estimation and Inference Using Mixtures”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 577–588.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T. S. (1973), “A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems”, The Annals of Statistics, 1, 209–230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L. S. and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1989), “Comparison of Bayesian with Group Sequential Methods for Monitoring Clinical Trials”, Controlled Clin. Trials, 10, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. and Mukhopadhyay, S. (1995), “On Nonparametric Bayesian Inference for the Distribution of a Random Sample”, Canandian Journal of Statistics, 23, 411–420.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. (1990), “Sampling Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E. and Vlachos, P. K. (1995), “Bayesian Clinical Trial Design for Multivariate Categorical Response Models”, Technical Report 9501, Department of Statistics, The University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, N.L. and Pocock, S.J. (1987), “Interim Analyses in Randomized Clinical Trials: Ramifications and Guidelines for Practitioners”, Biometrics, 43, 213–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J. B. (1995), “Prime Time for Bayes”, Controlled Clin. Trials, 16, 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J. B. and Vlachos, P. K. (1998), “Hybrid Methods for Calculating Optimal Sequential Strategies: Data Monitoring for a Clinical Trial”, Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L. (1986), “Computations of Mixtures of Dirichlet Processes”, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 7, 60–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J. and Berry, D. A. (1994), “Group Sequential Clinical Trials: A Classical Evaluation of Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Design”, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, P. C. and Fleming, T. R. (1979), “A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials”, Biometrics 35, 549–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, S.J. (1977), “Group Sequential Methods in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials”, Biometrica, 64, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J. and Freedman, L. S. (1988), “Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials (with discussion)”, in Bayesian Statistics 3 (eds: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., DeGroot, M., and Smith, A.F.M.), Oxford University Press, 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S., and Parmar, M. K. B. (1994), “Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials (with discussion)”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 157, 357–416.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thall, P. F., Simon, R., and Estey, E. H. (1995), “Bayesian Sequential Monitoring Designs for Single-arm Clinical Trials with Multiple Outcomes”, Statist. in Medicine, 14, 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. K. and Gelfand, A. E. (1996), “Bayesian Decision Theoretic Design for Group Sequential Medical Trials Having Multivariate Patient Response”, Technical Report 96–03, Department of Statistics, The University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vlachos, P.K., Gelfand, A.E. (1998). Nonparametric Bayesian Group Sequential Design. In: Dey, D., Müller, P., Sinha, D. (eds) Practical Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bayesian Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 133. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1732-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1732-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98517-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1732-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics