Abstract
We need to evaluate the results of the 1997 Cary Conference and the chapters in this book in terms of: (1) our initial ideas about the factors driving success, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem ecology, and (2) other lessons and ideas that emerged from the presentations and discussions at the conference and in this book. Coming into the conference, we had two “big questions” driving our analysis of successes, limitations, and frontiers. The first question addressed the hypothesis that ecosystem ecology is somewhat unique as a discipline because advances in this field have been driven by the emergence of new environmental problems that could not be addressed with existing conceptual and practical tools. The second question arose from the perception that ecosystem ecology suffers from a lack of cohesion, focus, and justification relative to many other disciplines. Determining whether this perception is true, and evaluating the factors behind these problems was one of our major goals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brown, J.H. 1997.An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity. Ecoessay series number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.
Edwards, P. 1995. Ecological progress the meet the challenge of environmental change.Trends in Ecology and Evolution10:261.
Jones, C.G., and J.H. Lawton. eds. 1994.Linking species and ecosystems.Chapman & Hall, New York.
Likens, G.E. 1992.The ecosystem approach: its use and abuse.Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett. eds. 1993.Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas.Springer-Verlag, New York.
Pickett, S.T.A., R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens, eds. 1997.Enhancing the ecological basis of conservation.Chapman & Hall, New York.
Tjossem, S.F. 1997.Reply to James H. Brown’s “An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity.” EcoEssay Series Number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Groffman, P.M., Pace, M.L. (1998). Synthesis: What Kind of a Discipline Is This Anyhow?. In: Pace, M.L., Groffman, P.M. (eds) Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_20
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98475-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1724-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive