Skip to main content

Abstract

We need to evaluate the results of the 1997 Cary Conference and the chapters in this book in terms of: (1) our initial ideas about the factors driving success, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem ecology, and (2) other lessons and ideas that emerged from the presentations and discussions at the conference and in this book. Coming into the conference, we had two “big questions” driving our analysis of successes, limitations, and frontiers. The first question addressed the hypothesis that ecosystem ecology is somewhat unique as a discipline because advances in this field have been driven by the emergence of new environmental problems that could not be addressed with existing conceptual and practical tools. The second question arose from the perception that ecosystem ecology suffers from a lack of cohesion, focus, and justification relative to many other disciplines. Determining whether this perception is true, and evaluating the factors behind these problems was one of our major goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, J.H. 1997.An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity. Ecoessay series number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. 1995. Ecological progress the meet the challenge of environmental change.Trends in Ecology and Evolution10:261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.G., and J.H. Lawton. eds. 1994.Linking species and ecosystems.Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E. 1992.The ecosystem approach: its use and abuse.Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M.J., and S.T.A. Pickett. eds. 1993.Humans as components of ecosystems: the ecology of subtle human effects and populated areas.Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S.T.A., R.S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G.E. Likens, eds. 1997.Enhancing the ecological basis of conservation.Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjossem, S.F. 1997.Reply to James H. Brown’s “An ecological perspective on the challenge of complexity.” EcoEssay Series Number 1.National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groffman, P.M., Pace, M.L. (1998). Synthesis: What Kind of a Discipline Is This Anyhow?. In: Pace, M.L., Groffman, P.M. (eds) Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1724-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98475-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1724-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics