Advertisement

Insights from Canada, Israel, and the Netherlands

  • Warren Greenberg

Abstract

Canada, Israel, and the Netherlands each use different degrees of market competition, government intervention, and rationing in the health care marketplace. Canada differs most from the United States in its reliance on a single-payer rather than a multipayer system. Both Israel and the Netherlands have a multipayer system but put greater stress on distributional equity than does the United States. None of the three countries makes use of the employer in the provision of health insurance. An analysis of each of the three systems will explain the relative doses of competition, regulation, and rationing that might be used in the financing of health care in the United States.

Keywords

Health Care System Cost Containment Sickness Fund Benefit Package Distributional Equity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren Greenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Services Management and Policy School of Public Health and Health ServicesThe George Washington UniversityN.W.USA

Personalised recommendations