Abstract
When plucking petals, we often try to cheat a little, cleverly, so that not even we notice the deception. In a moment when no one is looking—ourselves included—we take off two petals “accidentally”; or when a few petals still remain we toss away the flower just “in time”—saying that the flower was irregular, that it was defective, and therefore we have to begin over with a new flower. The only judge is the psyche of the person in love; the very psyche who decided to cheat. Therefore, it is probable that the judge will be lenient, at least to a certain extent, for example by permitting another try. We often thus regulate the probabilities associated with a mixed strategy, even if we do not take off real petals or roll real dice, but simply ponder our own affairs. Sometimes we accept the result of our first happenstance train of thought, while at other times we try to think things over from other perspectives as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mérő, L. (1998). Rational Irrationality. In: Moral Calculations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1654-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1654-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7232-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1654-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive