Advertisement

A Primer on Biodynamics and Gene Expression

  • James L. Hargrove
Chapter
  • 208 Downloads
Part of the Modeling Dynamic Systems book series (MDS)

Abstract

The most crucial element in scientific research is hypothesis testing. An hypothesis may be defined as “a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences.” An hypothesis must be stated in reference to a specific conceptual model that can be demonstrated to be false, if that is the outcome of a test. Before scientists ever begin an experiment, they review current information that pertains to a system of interest, and ask whether important gaps in knowledge exist. In this process, they are creating a mental model of a system, which is not merely an abstraction. To a new investigator, choosing a research topic in a highly competitive research environment is the most important career decision imaginable. The importance of simulation relative to this process is that the models can be created as system diagrams that actually function to produce numerical predictions concerning behavior. Even though the data are in a sense imaginary, there are practical applications for this ability. I have received at least one federal grant in which simulation was used in the grant application to explain an important concept to the review panel. The technique can also be used to generate system diagrams and data for seminars.

Keywords

Compartmental Model Output Rate Input Rate mRNA Concentration Mouse Button 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berlin, C.M., and R.T. Schimke. “Influence of turnover rates on responses of enzymes to cortisone.” Mol. Pharmacol. 1 (1965): 149–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gleick, J. Chaos, Making a New Science. New York: Penguin Books, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Godfrey K., ed. In: Compartmental Models and Their Applications. London: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Goodwin, B.C. Temporal Organization in Cells. London: Academic Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. Green M.H, J.B. Green. “The application of compartmental analysis to research in nutrition.” Annu. Rev. Nutr. 10 (1990): 41–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hargrove, J.L. “Microcomputer assisted kinetic modeling of mammalian gene expression.” FASEB J. 7 (1993): 1163–1170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoel, D.G. “A simple two-compartmental model applicable to enzyme regulation.” J. Biol. Chem. 245 (1970): 5811–5812.Google Scholar
  8. Jacquez, J.A. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. Maynard-Smith, J. “Kinetics of chemical reactions, c. The control of protein synthesis.” In Mathematical Ideas in Biology. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press, 1968, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Monod, J., A.M. Pappenheimer, and G. Cohen-Bazire. “La cinetique de la biosynthese de la ß-galactosidase chez E. coli considerée comme fonction de la croissance.” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 9 (1952): 648–660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Palmiter, R.D. “Ovalbumin mRNA translation.” J. Biol Chem. 248 (1973): 2095–2106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pelham, H.R.B., and R.J. Jackson. “An efficient mRNA-dependent translation system from reticulocyte lysates.” Eur.J. Biochem. 67 (1976): 247–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Richter, J.D., and L.D. Smith. “Differential capacity for translation and lack of competition between mRNAs that segregate to free and membrane-bound polysomes.” Cell 27 (1981): 183–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yagil, G. “Enzyme induction.” In: Segel, L.A., ed. Mathematical Models in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980, 68–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Hargrove
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foods and NutritionUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations