Advertisement

Stochastic Model of Bone Remodeling and Osteoporosis

  • James L. Hargrove
Chapter
  • 208 Downloads
Part of the Modeling Dynamic Systems book series (MDS)

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a condition of skeletal fragility manifested by an increased risk of bone fracture that is now a major health problem in many countries (Melton, 1991). Oddly, this bone disorder is a sign of successfully living a long life, for it is relatively uncommon among people less than 50 years of age. Nevertheless, it is crippling to those afflicted, and there is a sense of paradox in that osteoporosis is more readily prevented than cured. Any person with risk factors for osteoporosis needs to become mindful that preventative strategies should begin in adolescence, or at the earliest possible stage in life, for the greater the bone density achieved during one’s growing years, the longer it will be before bone deterioration begins to affect health.

Keywords

Trabecular Bone Bone Remodel Lumbar Vertebra Control Panel Initial Thickness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Delmas, P.D. “Clinical use of biochemical markers of bone remodeling in osteoporosis.” Bone. 13 (1992): S17–S21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hillner, B.E. “Estrogen therapy for geriatric osteoporosis—Just one ball in a complex juggling act.” So. Med.J. 85 (1992): 2S10–2S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jaros, G.G., T.G. Coleman, and A.C. Guyton. “Model of short-term regulation of calcium-ion concentration.” Simulation. 32 (1979): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Melton, L.J. “Epideomology of osteoporosis.” Bailleres Clin. Obstet and Gynecol. 5 (1991): 785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mosekilde, Li. “Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture—assessed by a new method.” Bone. 9 (1988): 247–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mosekilde, L. “Osteoporosis and calcium.” J. Int. Med. 231 (1992): 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mosekilde, Ii. and Le. Mosekilde. “Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density, and biomechanical competence in normal individuals.” Bone. 11 (1990): 67–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mosekilde, Li., Le. Mosekilde, and C.C. Danielson. “Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals.” Bone. 8 (1987): 79–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mosekilde, Li., S.E. Weisbrode, J.A. Safron, H.F. Stills, M.L. Jankowsky, D.C. Ebert, C.C. Danielson, C.H. Sogaard, A.F. Franks, M.L. Stevens, C.L. Paddock, and R.W. Boyce. “Calcium-restricted ovariectomized Sinclair s-1 minipigs: an animal model of osteopenia and trabecular plate perforation.” Bone. 14 (1993): 379–382.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, K.H. “Computer simulation of bone remodeling and osteoporosis as a tool for medical education.” Master’s thesis. Athens, Ga: University of Georgia (1995).Google Scholar
  11. Wardlaw, G.M. “Putting osteoporosis in perspective.” J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 93 (1993): 1000–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Weaver, C.M. “Age-related calcium requirements due to changes in absorption and utilization.” J. Nutr. 124 (1994): 1418S–1425S.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Hargrove
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foods and NutritionUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations