Skip to main content

The Role of Ultrasound in Oocyte Donation Programs

  • Chapter
Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation

Abstract

Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is not new to the infertility specialist. In the United States, the first subspeciality of obstetrics and gynecology to use the transvaginal sonographic scanning technique was infertility, employing it for monitoring ovulation and oocyte aspiration. TVS obviates the need for a full urinary bladder to image the pelvic and patient acceptance is much higher. When high-resolution probes were introduced, the clear and crisp pictures that were generated became the most important incentive for its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dudiak CM, Turner DA, Patel SK, Archie JT, Silver B, Norusis M. Uterine leiomyomas in the infertile patient: pre-operative localization with MR imaging versus Ultrasound and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1988; 167: 627–630.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fedele L, Biandi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 167: 603–606.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drews M, Bergh PA, Masuka A, Sandier B, Birkenfeld, Deligdisch L. Preliminary observations on abnormal sequential histologic maturation of the human endometrium during “ controlled” ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. The 47th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, Orlando, FL, October 21–24, 1991. Abstract P-139.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia J, Acosta A, Hsiu JG, Jones HW, Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1984; 41: 31–

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis OK, Berkley AS, Naus GJ, Cholst IN, Freedman KS. The incidence of luteal phase defect in normal, fertile women, determined by serial endometrial biopsies. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51: 582–586.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J in Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1991; 8: 116–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shoham A, CiCarlo C, Patel A, Conway GS, Jacobs HS. Is it possible to run a successful ovulation induction program based solely on ultrasound monitoring? The importance of endometrial measurements. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 836–841.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Antinori S, Versaci C, Hosein Gholami G, Panci C, Caffa B. Oocyte donation in menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 1487–1490.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro H, Cowell C, Casper RF. The use of vaginal ultrasound for monitoring endometrial preparation in donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 1055–1058.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdalla HI, Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Kirkland A, Thomas A, Studd JWW. Endometrial thickness: a predictor of implantation in ovum recipients? Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 363–365.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman GE, Thie J, Scott RT, Navot D. Endometrial thickness is predictive of histologic endometrial maturation in woman undergoing hormone replacement for ovum donation. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66: 380–383.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor SN, Curole DN, Matulich EM. Relationship of endometrial thickness and pattern to fecundity in ovulation induction cycles: effect of clomiphene citrate alone and in combination with human menopausal gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 756–760.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1950; 1: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischer AC, Kalemeris GC, Machina JE, Entman SS, James E. Sonographic depiction of normal and abnormal endometrium with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1986; 5: 445–452.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe J, Dietterich C. Influence of endometrial thickness and echo patterns on pregnancy rates during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 1173–1175.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonen Y, Casper RF, Jacobson W, Blankier J. Endometrial thickness and growth during ovarian stimulation: a possible predictor of implantation in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1989; 52: 446–450.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandier B, Hofmann G, Navot D. High resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 200–204.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers PAW, Polson D, Murphy CR, Hosie M, Susil B, Leoni M. Correlation of endometrial histology, morphometry, and ultrasound appearance after different stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55: 583–587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakamoto C, Yoshimutu K, Nakamura G, Ootsuka H, Uoshida K. Sonographic study of the endometrial responses to ovarian hormones in patients receiving ovarian stimulation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988; 27: 407–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ueno J, Oehninger S, Brzyski RG, Acosta AA, Philput CB, Muasher SJ. Ultrasonographic appearance of the endometrium in natural and stimulated invitro fertilization cycles and its correlation with outcome. Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 901–904.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Khalifa E, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ. Sonographic appearance of the endometrium: the predictive value for the outcome of invitro fertilization in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod. 1992; 7: 677–680.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Shawaf T, Yang D, Al-Magid Y, Seaton A, Iketubosin F, Craft I. Ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 2068–2074.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sher G, Herbert C, Maasanari G, Jacobs MH. Assessment of the late proliferative phase endometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVT/IVF). Hum Reprod. 1991; 6: 232–237.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sher G, Dodge S, Maassarani G, Nutzen V, Louves D, Feinman M. Management of suboptimal sonographic endometrial patterns in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 347–349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goswamy RK, Steptoe PC. Doppler ultrasound studies of the uterine artery in spontaneous ovarian cycles. Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 721–726.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fleischer AC. Ultrasound imaging-2000: assessment of utero-ovarian blood flow with transvaginal color Doppler sonography; potential clinical applications in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55: 684–691.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Santolaya-Forgas J. Physiology of the menstrual cycle by sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1992; 11: 139–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scholtes MCW, Wladimiroff JW, van Rijen HJM, Hop WCJ. Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: a transvaginal Doppler study. Fertil Steril. 1989; 52: 981–985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams MF. The vascular architecture of the rat uterus as influenced by estrogen and progesterone. Am J Anat. 1948; 83: 247–307. Program Supplement, 1990, p 530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moll W, Gotz R. Pressure-diameter curves of mesometrial arteries of guinea pigs demonstrate a non-muscular, oestrogen-inducible mechanism of lumen regulation. Pflugers Arch. 1985; 404: 332–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lantta M, Karkahainen J, Lehtovirta P. Progesterone and estradiol receptors in the cytosol of the human uterine artery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 147: 627–633.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Greiss FC, Anderson SG. Effects of ovarian hormones on the uterine vascular bed. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 107: 829–836.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Haywood JR, Shaffer RA, Fastenow C, Fink GD, Brody MJ. Regional blood flow measurement with pulsed Doppler flowmeter in conscious rat. Am J Physiol. 1981; 241: H273–H278.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. de Zeigler D, Bessis R, Frydman R. Vascular resistance of uterine arteries. Fertil Steril. 1991; 55(4): 775–779.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zalud I, Kurjak A. The assessment of luteal blood flow in pregnant and nonpregnant women by transvaginal color Doppler. J Perinat Med. 1990; 18: 215.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Steer CV, Campbell S, Pampiglione JS, Kindsland CR, Mason BA, Collins WP. Transvaginal colour flow imaging of the uterine arteries during the ovarian and menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 1990; 5: 391–395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Goswamy RK, Williams G, Steptoe PC. Decreased uterine perfusion— a cause of infertility. Hum Reprod. 1988; 3: 955.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Baber RJ, McSweeney MB, Gill RW, et al. Transvaginal pulsed Doppler ultrasound assessment of blood flow to the corpus luteum in IVF patients following embryo transfer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988; 95: 1226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tan SL, Steer C, Mills C, Rizk B, Mason BA, Campbell S. Vaginal color Doppler assessment of the day of embryo transfer (ET) accurately predicts patients in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme with suboptimal uterine perfusion who fail to become pregnant. Presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of The American Fertility Society, Washington, D.C., October 15–18, 1990. Abstract O-070, page 530.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Strohmer H, Merczeg C, Pleckinger B, Kemerter P, Feichtinger W. Prognostic appraisal of success and failure in an in-vitro fertilization program by transvaginal Doppler ultrasound at the time of ovulation induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 1: 272–274.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Favre R, Bettahar K, Grange G, et al. Predictive value of transvaginal uterine ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 3: 350–353.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bustillo M, Krysa LW, Coulam CB. Uterine receptivity in an oocyte donation programme. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10(2): 442–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Asherman JG. Amenorrhea traumation (atretica). J Obstet Gynecol Br Emp. 1948; 55: 23–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schenker JG, Margaliotu EJ. Intrauterine adhesions: an updated appraisal. Fertil Steril. 1982; 37: 593–610.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Determination of chorionicity and amnionicity in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high frequency TVS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170: 827–829.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S. Transvaginal sonographic study of the Fallopian tube. Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 70: 424–428.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. de Crespigny IC. Demonstration of ectopic pregnancy by transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 95: 1253–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Timor-Tritsch IE, Yeh MN, Peisner DB, et al. The use of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 157–161.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cacciatore B, Stenman U-H, Ylostalo P. Comparison of abdominal and vaginal sonography in suspected ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73: 770–774.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Stiller RJ, de Regt RH, Blair E. Transvaginal ultrasonography in patients at risk for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 930–933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bateman BG, Nunley WC, Kolp LA, et al. Vaginal sonography findings and hCG dynamics of early intrauterine and tubal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990: 75: 421–427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson EB, Freimanis MG. Transvaginal sonography in evaluating ectopic pregnancy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1990; 11: 44–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Lerner JP. A “ potentially safer” route for puncture and injection of normal ectopic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 7: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Monteagudo A, Tarricone NJ, Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP. Successful trans-vaginal ultrasound guided puncture and injection of a cervical pregnancy in a patient with simultaneous intrauterine pregnancy and a history of a previous cervical pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 8: 381–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Evans MI, Dommergues M, Wapner RJ, et al. International, Collaborative Experience of 1789 patients having multifetal pregnancy reduction: a plateauing of risks and outcomes. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 1996; 3: 23–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haratz-Rubinstein, N., Timor-Tritsch, I.E. (1998). The Role of Ultrasound in Oocyte Donation Programs. In: Sauer, M.V. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7226-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics