Skip to main content
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

Oocyte donation represents one of the most expensive assisted reproductive technologies (ART) currently available to infertile couples. However, it consistently has offered better success rates than other fertility treatment. There is little direct evidence, but plenty of inferential data, to suggest it is a cost-effective treatment option. The overall costs of infertility services in the United States was estimated to be $1 billion in 1987.1 In 1995 nearly $200 million dollars was spent on in vitro fertilization (IVF) alone (based on 1993 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology [SART] data).2 Overall in the United States in 1993 approximately 6% of ART cycles initiated in SART participating programs in the United States involved the use of donor oocytes. Given the wide range of cost in donor oocyte cycles, it is difficult to estimate how much was actually spent on this treatment modality. Although the per cycle cost is substantially more, the total donor oocyte costs are less than conventional in vitro fertilization. It has been estimated that only 5% of ART cycles in the United States are performed at centers that do not report their results to SART.1 Thus, these statistics may be used to estimate the overall costs of oocyte donation in the United States. Based on a projected average of $12,000 per cycle, this would amount to an estimated $33,192,200 spent on oocyte donation in 1993. This is, however, a conservative estimate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Infertility and medical and social choices. Office of Technology Assessment. United States Government Printing Office, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins JA, Bustillo M, Visscher RD, Lawrence LD. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 538–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results generated from the American Fertility Society registry. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 956–963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 1994; 62: 1121–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SART. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann PJ, Gharim SD, Weinstein MC. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 239–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seibel MM, Bernstein J. Cost-effective trial ballons and the potential for bias: the case against in vitro fertilization. J Womens Health 1994; 3: 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Corfman RS, Ory SJ, Milad MP, Erickson LD, Bellavance TL, Ball GD. A novel ovarian stimulation protocol for use with the assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1993; 60: 860–864.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldfarb JM, Austin C, Lisbona H, Peskin B, Clapp M. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The American Fertility Society. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59(2): 5S–9S.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Braverman AM. Ovum Donor Task Force of the Psychological Special Interests Group of The American Fertility Society. Survey results of the current practice of ovum donation. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 1216–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sauer MV. Oocyte donation: reflections on past work and future directions. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 1149–1150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peskin BD, Austin C, Lisbona H, Goldfarb JM. Cost analysis of shared oocyte in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 428–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Legro RS, Shackleford DP, Moessner JM, Gnatuk CL, Dodson WC. Cost of achieving pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology in women aged 40 or older. J Reprod Med. 1997; 42: 76–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott RT, Hofmann GE. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63: 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dodson WC, Haney AF. Superovulation and intrauterine insemination. In: Adashi EY, Rock JA, Rosenwaks Z, eds. Reproductive Endocrinology, Surgery, and Technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven; 1996; (vol 2): 2233–2244.

    Google Scholar 

  17. FIVNAT. French national IVF registry: analysis of 1986-1990 data. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: 587–595.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paulson RJ, Hatch IE, Lobo RA, Sauer MV. Cumulative success rates after oocyte donation: life table analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 1995; 12: 74S. Abstract #OC-190.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stern Z, Laufer N, Levy R, Ben-Shushan D, Mor-Yosef S. Cost analysis of in vitro fertilization. Israeli Med Sci. 1995; 31: 492–496.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dor J, Seidman DS, Ben-Shlomo I, Levran D, Ben-Rafael Z, Mashiach S. Cumulative pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization: the significance of age and infertility aetiology. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 425–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wozencraft A. It’s a baby or your money back. The New York Times August 25, 1996; p 1. Money & Business.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Applegarth L, Goldberg NC, Cholst I, et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995; 12: 574–580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 917–922.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Michalas S, Loutradis D, Drakakis P, et al. Oocyte donation to women over 40 years of age: pregnancy complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 64: 175–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Legro RS, Wong IL, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA, Sauer MV. Recipient age does not affect pregnancy or miscarriage rates following oocyte donation. Am I Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 96–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Callahan RL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Greene MF, Crowley WF. The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 244–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Olivennes F, Kadhel P, Rufat P, Fanchin R, Fernandez H, Frydman R. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies obtained after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seibel MM. Toward reducing risks and costs of egg donation: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 199–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Legro, R.S. (1998). Cost-Effectiveness of Care. In: Sauer, M.V. (eds) Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1640-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7226-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1640-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics