Abstract
In this article we describe mathematical aspects of the radiation therapy optimization problem. Various says of formulating the problem are presented and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. F. Bielajew, Photon Monte Carlo Simulation, Lecture Notes, National Research Council of Canada, Report PIRS-0393, available on the internet at http://ehssun.lbl.gov/egs/epub/course.html 1993.
A. F. Bielajew and D.W.O. Rogers, Electron Monte Carlo Simulation, Lecture Notes, National Research Council of Canada, Report PIRS-0394, available on the internet at http://ehssun.lbl.gov/egs/epub/course.html 1993.
C. Börgers, A fast iterative method for computing particle beams penetrating matter,J. Comp. Phys., 133, 323–339, 1997.
C. Börgers, Complexity of Monte Carlo and deterministic dose-calculation methods, Phys. Med. Biol., 43, 517–528, 1998.
C. Börgers and E.W.Larsen, The transversely integrated scalar flux of a narrowly focused particle beam, SIAM J. Appl. Math, 50, No. 1, 1–22, 1995.
C. Börgers and E.W. Larsen, Asymptotic derivation of the Fermi pencil beam approximation, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 123, No. 3, 343–357, 1996.
C. Börgers and E.W. Larsen, On the accuracy of the Fokker-Planck and Fermi pencil beam equations for charged particle transport, Med. Phys., 23, 17491759, 1996.
C. Börgers and E.T. Quinto, Nullspace and conditioning of the mapping from beam weights to dose distributions in radiation therapy planning, in preparation.
C. Burman, G.J. Kutcher, B. Emami, and M. Goitein, Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to analytic functions, Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 21, 123–135, 1991.
Y. Censor, Mathematical aspects of radiation therapy treatment planning: Continuous inversion versus full discretization and optimization versus feasibility, in this volume.
Y. Censor, M.D. Altschuler, and W.D. Powlis, On the use of Cimmino’s simultaneous projection method for computing a solution of the inverse problem in radiation therapy treatment planning,Inverse Problems, 4, 607–623, 1988.
A.M. Cormack and E.T. Quinto, The mathematics and physics of radiation dose planning using X-rays, Contemporary Mathematics, 113, 41–55, 1990.
R. Dautray and J.-L. Lions, Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology, vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
J.O. Deasy, Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints, Med. Phys., 24, No. 7, 1157–1161, 1997.
J.J. Duderstadt and W.R. Martin, Transport Theory, John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
E. Fermi, result reported in B. Rossi and K. Greisen, Cosmic ray theory, Rev. Mod. Phys., 13, 240, 1941.
M. Goitein, Causes and consequences of inhomogeneous dose distributions in radiation therapy, Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 12, 701–704, 1986.
M. Goitein and A. Niemierko, Biologically based models for scoring treatment plans, presentation to the Joint U.S./Scandinavian Symposium on Future Directions of Computer-Aided Radiotherapy, San Antonio, 1988.
T. Holmes and T.R. Mackie, A comparison of three inverse treatment planning algorithms, Phys. Med. Biol., 39 91–106, 1994.
J.J. Janssen, D.E.J. Riedeman, M. Morawska-Kaczyińska, P.R.M. Storchi, and H. Huizenga, Numerical calculation of energy deposition by high-energy electron beams: III. Three-dimensional heterogeneous media, Phys. Med. Biol., 39, 1351–1366, 1994.
J.J. Janssen, E.W. Korevaar, R.M. Storchi, and H. Huizenga, Numerical calculation of energy deposition by high-energy electron beams: III-B. Improvements to the 6D phase space evolution model, Phys. Med. Biol., 42, 1441–1449, 1997.
D. Jette, Electron beam dose calculations, in Radiation Therapy Physics, A. R. Smith (ed.), 95–121, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.
H.E. Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The Physics of Radiology, fourth edition, Charles C. Thomas, 1983.
F.M. Khan, The Physics of Radiation Therapy, second edition, Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
K.M. Khattab and E.W. Larsen, Synthetic acceleration methods for linear transport problems with highly anisotropic scattering, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 107 217–227, 1991.
G.J. Kutcher and C. Burman, Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method, Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 16 1623–1630, 1989.
E.W. Larsen, Diffusion-synthetic acceleration methods for discrete-ordinate problems, Transport Theory Stat. Phys., 13 107–126, 1984.
E.W. Larsen, Tutorial: The nature of transport calculations used in radiation oncology, Transport Theory Stat. Phys., 26 No. 7, 739, 1997.
R.Y. Levine, E.A. Gregerson, and M.M. Urie, The application of the X-ray transform to 3D conformal radiotherapy, in this volume.
I. Lux and L. Koblinger, Monte Carlo Particle Transport Methods: Neutron and Photon Calculations, CRC Press, 1991.
J.T. Lyman, Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms, Rad. Res., 104 S-13—S-19, 1985.
R. Mohan, G.S. Maleras, B. Baldwin, L.J. Brewster, G.J. Kutcher, S. Leibel, C.M. Burman, C.C. Ling, and Z. Fuks, Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments, Med. Phys., 19 933–944, 1992.
R. Mohan, X. Wang, A. Jackson, T. Bortfeld, A.L. Boyer, G. J. Kutcher, S.A. Leibel, Z. Furs, and C.C. Ling, The potential and limitations of the inverse radiotherapy technique, Radiother. Oncol., 32 232–248, 1994.
J.E. Morel and T.A. Manteuffel, An angular multigrid acceleration technique for S n equations with highly forward-peaked scattering, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 107 330–342, 1991.
H. Neuenschwander, T.R. Mackie, and P.J. Reckwerdt, MMC — A high-performance Monte Carlo code for electron beam treatment planning, Phys. Med. Biol., 40 543, 1995.
A. Niemierko, Optimization of intensity modulated beams: Local or global optimum?, Med. Phys., 23 1072, 1996.
A. Niemierko and M. Goitein, Calculation of normal tissue complication probability and dose-volume histogram reduction schemes for tissues with a critical element structure, Radiother. Oncol., 20 166–176, 1991.
A. Niemierko, M. Urie, and M. Goitein, Optimization of 3D radiation therapy with both physical and biological end points and constraints, Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 23 99–108, 1992.
G.C. Pomraning, Linear Kinetic Theory and Particle Transport in Stochastic Mixtures,Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences Vol. 7, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991.
Radiology Centennial, Inc., A Century of Radiology, http://www.xray.hmc.psu.edu/rci/centennial.html, 1993.
C. Raphael, Mathematical modelling of objectives in radiation therapy treatment planning, Phys. Med. Biol., 37 No. 6, 1293–1311, 1992.
S. Webb, The Physics of Three-Dimensional Radiation Therapy, IOP Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1993.
S. Webb, Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by multi-leaf collimators: II. Inclusion of two-dimensional modulation of X-ray intensities, Phys. Med. Biol., 37 1689–1704, 1992.
H.R. Withers, J.M.G. Taylor, and B. Maciejewski, Treatment volume and tissue tolerance,Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 14 751–759, 1988.
C.D. Zerby and F.L. Keller, Electron transport theory, calculations, and experiments, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 27 190–218, 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Börgers, C. (1999). The Radiation Therapy Planning Problem. In: Börgers, C., Natterer, F. (eds) Computational Radiology and Imaging. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 110. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1550-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1550-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7189-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1550-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive