Skip to main content

Search, Binary Representations and Counting Optima

  • Chapter
Evolutionary Algorithms

Part of the book series: The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications ((IMA,volume 111))

Abstract

Choosing a good representation is a vital component of solving any search problem. However, choosing a good representation for a problem is as difficult as choosing a good search algorithm for a problem. Wolpert and Мacready’s No Free Lunch theorem proves that no search algorithm is better than any other over all possible discrete functions. We elaborate on the No Free Lunch theorem by proving that there tend to be a small set of points that occur as local optima under almost all representations. Along with the analytical results, we provide some empirical evaluation of two representations commonly used in genetic algorithms: Binary Reflected Gray coding and standard Binary encoding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keith E. Mathias and L. Darrell Whitley, Changing representations during search: A comparative study of delta coding,Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 2 (3) pp. 249–278, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Mühlenbein, Evolution in time and space: The parallel genetic algorithm,In G. Rawlins, editor, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pp. 316–337, Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholas J. Radcliffe and Patrick D. Surry, Fundamental limitations on search algorithms: Evolutionary computing in perspective,In Jan van Leeuwen, editor, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1000 Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darrell Whitley, Keith Mathias, Soraya Rana, and John Dzubera, Evaluating evolutionary algorithms, Artificial Intelligence Journal, 85 August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David H. Wolpert and William G. Macready, No free lunch theorems for search, Technical Report SFI-TR-95–02–010, Santa Fe Institute, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rana, S., Whitley, L.D. (1999). Search, Binary Representations and Counting Optima. In: Davis, L.D., De Jong, K., Vose, M.D., Whitley, L.D. (eds) Evolutionary Algorithms. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 111. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1542-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1542-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7185-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1542-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics