Skip to main content

Pluralistic Competition

  • Chapter
Environmental Problem Solving

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Environmental Management ((SSEM))

  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

The upsurge of militant environmentalism in the 1970s introduced a variety of new psychosocial elements into the problem-solving process, making the market place of ideas much more diverse and turbulent. Particularly troublesome for the iron triangles, who had enjoyed a monopoly on decision-making power for so long, was the militant anti-industrial, antigrowth, proenvironmental stance of many of these newly organized groups. In other words, after decades of quiescence, the Arcadian worldview was beginning to reassert itself. As a result, the relatively orderly world of the decision maker was invaded by advocates of worldviews they could barely understand using styles of thinking (subjective-holistic) they were unable to tolerate. On the positive side, this period of upheaval rescued elements of Arcadian thinking from oblivion, thrusting them into public awareness where they have remained.1 On the other hand, the period was one of bad-tempered bickering during which the problem-solving process was engulfed in posturing rather than improved in quality. Debate seldom reached beyond short-term preoccupations to the more fundamental issues of sociopolitical change and social justice but became mired in the details of parochial conflicts. As a result, the period between 1970 and 1985 was one of confrontation and litigation, which hindered, rather than facilitated, innovative policy making. What I shall argue in this chap-ter, therefore, is that although this period of interest-group politics may have achieved some local gains, it did not result in more adaptive forms of problem solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eder, K. 1996. The institutionalisation of environmentalism: Ecological discourse and the second transformation of the public sphere. In Risk environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology ed. S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 203–223. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, P., and E. Ferguson. 1995. “Making a big stink”: Women’s work, women’s relationships, and toxic waste activism. Gender e Society 9:145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine, A. 1982. Love Canal: Science politics, and people. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, P., and E. Mikkelsen. 1990. No safe place: Toxic waste leukemia and community action. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cable, S., and M. Benson. 1993. Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations. Social Problems 40:464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Couch, S., and J. Kroll-Smith. 1985. The chronic technical disaster: Toward a social scientific perspective. Social Science Quarterly 66:564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harr, J. 1995. A civil action. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hallman, W., and A. Wandersman. 1992. Attribution of responsibility and individual and collective coping with environmental threats. Journal of Social Issues 48 :101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Renn, O. et al. 1992. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues 48:137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cvetkovich, G., and T. Earle. 1992. Environmental hazards and the public. Journal of Social Issues 48:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dake, K. 1992. Myths of nature: Culture and social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues 48:21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz, S., P. White, and R. Hughes. 1985. Environmental threats, communities, and hysteria. Journal of Public Health Policy 6:58–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayan, B. 1988. Science under siege: The myth of objectivity in scientific research. Montreal: CBC Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffman, A. 1995. An uneasy rebirth at Love Canal. Environment 37:5–9, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whelan, E. 1993. Toxic terror: The truth behind the cancer scares. Buffalo: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wildaysky, A. 1995. But is it true?A citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baskerville, G. 1995. The forestry problem: Adaptive lurches of renewal. In Barriers and bridges to renewal of ecosystems and institutions ed. L. Gunderson, C. Holling, and S. Light, 37–102. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Webb, F. and H. Irving. 1983. My fir lady: the New Brunswick production with its facts and fancies. Forestry Chronicle 59:118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lyles, M., and I. Mitroff. 1980. Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 25:102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bardwell, L. 1991. Problem-framing: A perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environmental Management 15:603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coughlin, J. 1994. The tragedy of the concrete commons: Defining traffic congestion as a public problem. In The politics of problem definition: Shaping the public agenda ed. D. Rochefort and R. Cobb, 138–158. Lawrence, Kans.: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roe, E. 1989. Narrative analysis for the policy analyst: A case study of the 1980–1982 Medfly controversy in California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8:251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis, S. 1995. The role of communication and symbolism in interest group competition: The case of the Siskiyou National Forest, 19831992. Political Communication 12:27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robison, W. 1994. Decisions in doubt: The environment and public policy. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, A. 1985. Technological thinking: Its impact on environmental management. Environmental Management 9:179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smil, V. 1993. Global Ecology: Environmental change and social flexibility. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Winter, D. 1996. Ecological Psychology: Healing the split between planet and self. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, K. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Olsen, S., ed. 1982. Group planning and problem solving methods in engineering management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Miller, A. 1987. Psychopathology amongst environmental professionals. The Environmental Professional 9:111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meadows, D. H. et al. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rastetter, E. 1996. Validating models of ecosystem response to global change: How can we best assess models of long-term global change? BioScience 46:190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arney, W. 1991. Experts in the age of systems. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Waldrop, M. 1992. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Botkin, D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Beck, P. 1982. Corporate planning for an uncer-tain future. Long Range Planning 15:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Clark, T., A. Curlee, and R. Reading. 1996. Crafting effective solutions to the large carnivore conservation problem. Conservation Biology 10:940–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Magill, A. 1988. Natural resource professionals: The reluctant public servants. The Environmental Professional 10:295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mohai, P. 1987. Public participation and natural resource decision-making: The case of the RARE II decisions. Natural Resources Journal 27:123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schnaiberg, A., and K. Gould. 1994. Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dalton, L. 1986. Why the rational paradigm persists-the resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 5:147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Brooks, M. 1993. A plethora of paradigms? Journal of the American Planning Association 59:142–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Udwadia, F. 1986. Management situations and the engineering mindset. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 29:387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Miller, A. 1991. Personality types: A modern syn- thesis. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pacey, A. 1983. The culture of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tangley, L. 1987. Malaria: fighting the African scourge. BioScience 37:94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kondrachine, A., and P. Trigg. 1995. Malaria: hope for the future. World Health 48:26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dryzek, J. 1987. Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Baskerville, G., and P. Duinker. 1986. Pest management in plantations: An institutional analysis. In Pest management in plantations: A consultative approach ed. N. Sonntag et al. Vancouver, B.C., ESSA Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sonntag, N. et al. 1986. Pest management in plantations: A consultative approach. Vancouver, B.C.: ESSA Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Isaksen, S., and D. Treffinger. 1985. Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, N.Y.: Bearly Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wenk, E. 1987. Trade Offs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-tech World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bosso, C. 1994. The contextual bases of problem definition. In The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda, ed. D. Rochefort and R. Cobb, 182–203. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Collingridge, D., and C. Reeve. 1986. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making. London: Francis Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mahoney, M. 1976. Scientist as subject: the psychological imperative. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lubchenko, J., et al. 1991. The sustainable biosphere intiative: An ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ozawa, C. 1991. Recasting science: Concensual pro-cedures in public policy making. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Caldwell, L. 1995. Environment as a focus for public policy. College Station: Texas A &M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Landre, B., and B. Knuth. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 6:229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Labossiere, J. 1982. Presentation to the Pesticide Advisory Board: Public hearings on December 14th, Newcastle, N.B., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Coombs, D. 1985. Presentation to the Pesticide Advisory Board: Public hearings on November 18th, Woodstock, N.B., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Richardson, M., J. Sherman, and M. Gismondi. 1993. Winning back the words: Confronting experts in an environmental public hearing. Toronto: Garamond Press.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Modavi, N. 1996. Mediation of environmental conflicts in Hawaii: Win-win or co-optation? Sociological Perspectives 39:310–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Collette, W. 1989. The polluters’ “secret plan”. Arlington, Va.: Citizens’ Clearing House for Hazardous Wastes, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Solecki, W. 1995. Paternalism, pollution and protest in a company town. Political Geography 15:5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Matland, R. 1995. Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Adminitration Research and Theory 5:145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  69. O’Leary, R. 1994. The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory 4:443–467.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Karlberg, M. 1997. News and conflict: How adversarial news frames limit public understand-ing of environmental issues. Alternatives 23:2227.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Birkeland. 1990. Tasmania: The story. Presented at Clayquot Sound Wilderness Conference, September 8, Vargas Island, B.C., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Doyle, T., and A. Kellow. 1995. Environmental politics and policymaking in Australia. South Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Marcus, A. 1988. Risk, uncertainty, and scientific judgement. Minerva 26:138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Goleman, D. 1985. Vital lies simple truths: The psychology of self-deception. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Smail, D. 1984. Illusion and reality: The meaning of anxiety. London: Dent & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Blades, K. 1995. Net d estruction: The death of Atlantic Canada’s fishery. Halifax, N.S.: Nimbus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Neis, B., and S. Williams. 1997. The new global right, gender and the fisheries crisis: Local and global dimensions. Atlantis 21:47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Neis, B. 1992. Fishers’ ecological knowledge and stock assessment in Newfoundland. Newfoundland Studies 8:155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hutchings, J., C. Walters, and R. Haedrich. 1997. Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54:1198–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Enman, C. 1997. Science silenced to hide ‘disasters’: Top biologist says DFO suppressed evidence of calamitous errors. Ottawa Citizen June 27, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Enman, C. 1997. 36 scientists: End the suppression: Manifesto calls for the restoration of integrity within DFO. Ottawa Citizen July 4, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Canadian Press. 1997. Fish experts draw fiery response from Ottawa: Scientists who accuse Fisheries officials of deception prompt blistering denials. Globe and Mail June 25, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, A. (1999). Pluralistic Competition. In: Environmental Problem Solving. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-40297-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1440-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics