Abstract
The upsurge of militant environmentalism in the 1970s introduced a variety of new psychosocial elements into the problem-solving process, making the market place of ideas much more diverse and turbulent. Particularly troublesome for the iron triangles, who had enjoyed a monopoly on decision-making power for so long, was the militant anti-industrial, antigrowth, proenvironmental stance of many of these newly organized groups. In other words, after decades of quiescence, the Arcadian worldview was beginning to reassert itself. As a result, the relatively orderly world of the decision maker was invaded by advocates of worldviews they could barely understand using styles of thinking (subjective-holistic) they were unable to tolerate. On the positive side, this period of upheaval rescued elements of Arcadian thinking from oblivion, thrusting them into public awareness where they have remained.1 On the other hand, the period was one of bad-tempered bickering during which the problem-solving process was engulfed in posturing rather than improved in quality. Debate seldom reached beyond short-term preoccupations to the more fundamental issues of sociopolitical change and social justice but became mired in the details of parochial conflicts. As a result, the period between 1970 and 1985 was one of confrontation and litigation, which hindered, rather than facilitated, innovative policy making. What I shall argue in this chap-ter, therefore, is that although this period of interest-group politics may have achieved some local gains, it did not result in more adaptive forms of problem solving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Eder, K. 1996. The institutionalisation of environmentalism: Ecological discourse and the second transformation of the public sphere. In Risk environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology ed. S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne, 203–223. London: Sage Publications.
Brown, P., and E. Ferguson. 1995. “Making a big stink”: Women’s work, women’s relationships, and toxic waste activism. Gender e Society 9:145–172.
Levine, A. 1982. Love Canal: Science politics, and people. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Brown, P., and E. Mikkelsen. 1990. No safe place: Toxic waste leukemia and community action. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
Cable, S., and M. Benson. 1993. Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations. Social Problems 40:464–477.
Couch, S., and J. Kroll-Smith. 1985. The chronic technical disaster: Toward a social scientific perspective. Social Science Quarterly 66:564–575.
Harr, J. 1995. A civil action. New York: Vintage.
Hallman, W., and A. Wandersman. 1992. Attribution of responsibility and individual and collective coping with environmental threats. Journal of Social Issues 48 :101–118.
Renn, O. et al. 1992. The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues 48:137–160.
Cvetkovich, G., and T. Earle. 1992. Environmental hazards and the public. Journal of Social Issues 48:1–20.
Dake, K. 1992. Myths of nature: Culture and social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues 48:21–37.
Schwartz, S., P. White, and R. Hughes. 1985. Environmental threats, communities, and hysteria. Journal of Public Health Policy 6:58–77.
Sayan, B. 1988. Science under siege: The myth of objectivity in scientific research. Montreal: CBC Enterprises.
Hoffman, A. 1995. An uneasy rebirth at Love Canal. Environment 37:5–9, 25–31.
Whelan, E. 1993. Toxic terror: The truth behind the cancer scares. Buffalo: Prometheus.
Wildaysky, A. 1995. But is it true?A citizen’s guide to environmental health and safety issues. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Baskerville, G. 1995. The forestry problem: Adaptive lurches of renewal. In Barriers and bridges to renewal of ecosystems and institutions ed. L. Gunderson, C. Holling, and S. Light, 37–102. New York: Columbia University Press.
Webb, F. and H. Irving. 1983. My fir lady: the New Brunswick production with its facts and fancies. Forestry Chronicle 59:118–122.
Lyles, M., and I. Mitroff. 1980. Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 25:102–119.
Bardwell, L. 1991. Problem-framing: A perspective on environmental problem-solving. Environmental Management 15:603–612.
Coughlin, J. 1994. The tragedy of the concrete commons: Defining traffic congestion as a public problem. In The politics of problem definition: Shaping the public agenda ed. D. Rochefort and R. Cobb, 138–158. Lawrence, Kans.: University Press of Kansas.
Roe, E. 1989. Narrative analysis for the policy analyst: A case study of the 1980–1982 Medfly controversy in California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8:251–273.
Davis, S. 1995. The role of communication and symbolism in interest group competition: The case of the Siskiyou National Forest, 19831992. Political Communication 12:27–42.
Robison, W. 1994. Decisions in doubt: The environment and public policy. Hanover: University Press of New England.
Miller, A. 1985. Technological thinking: Its impact on environmental management. Environmental Management 9:179–190.
Smil, V. 1993. Global Ecology: Environmental change and social flexibility. London: Routledge.
Winter, D. 1996. Ecological Psychology: Healing the split between planet and self. New York: Harper Collins.
Lee, K. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Olsen, S., ed. 1982. Group planning and problem solving methods in engineering management. New York: Wiley.
Miller, A. 1987. Psychopathology amongst environmental professionals. The Environmental Professional 9:111–120.
Meadows, D. H. et al. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Rastetter, E. 1996. Validating models of ecosystem response to global change: How can we best assess models of long-term global change? BioScience 46:190–198.
Arney, W. 1991. Experts in the age of systems. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Waldrop, M. 1992. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Botkin, D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beck, P. 1982. Corporate planning for an uncer-tain future. Long Range Planning 15:12–21.
Clark, T., A. Curlee, and R. Reading. 1996. Crafting effective solutions to the large carnivore conservation problem. Conservation Biology 10:940–948.
Magill, A. 1988. Natural resource professionals: The reluctant public servants. The Environmental Professional 10:295–303.
Mohai, P. 1987. Public participation and natural resource decision-making: The case of the RARE II decisions. Natural Resources Journal 27:123–155.
Schnaiberg, A., and K. Gould. 1994. Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dalton, L. 1986. Why the rational paradigm persists-the resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 5:147–153.
Brooks, M. 1993. A plethora of paradigms? Journal of the American Planning Association 59:142–145.
Udwadia, F. 1986. Management situations and the engineering mindset. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 29:387–397.
Miller, A. 1991. Personality types: A modern syn- thesis. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Pacey, A. 1983. The culture of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tangley, L. 1987. Malaria: fighting the African scourge. BioScience 37:94–98.
Kondrachine, A., and P. Trigg. 1995. Malaria: hope for the future. World Health 48:26–27.
Dryzek, J. 1987. Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. New York: Blackwell.
Baskerville, G., and P. Duinker. 1986. Pest management in plantations: An institutional analysis. In Pest management in plantations: A consultative approach ed. N. Sonntag et al. Vancouver, B.C., ESSA Ltd.
Sonntag, N. et al. 1986. Pest management in plantations: A consultative approach. Vancouver, B.C.: ESSA Ltd.
Isaksen, S., and D. Treffinger. 1985. Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, N.Y.: Bearly Ltd.
Wenk, E. 1987. Trade Offs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-tech World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bosso, C. 1994. The contextual bases of problem definition. In The politics of problem definition: Shaping the policy agenda, ed. D. Rochefort and R. Cobb, 182–203. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Collingridge, D., and C. Reeve. 1986. Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making. London: Francis Pinter.
Mahoney, M. 1976. Scientist as subject: the psychological imperative. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Lubchenko, J., et al. 1991. The sustainable biosphere intiative: An ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412.
Ozawa, C. 1991. Recasting science: Concensual pro-cedures in public policy making. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Caldwell, L. 1995. Environment as a focus for public policy. College Station: Texas A &M University Press.
Landre, B., and B. Knuth. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 6:229–257.
Labossiere, J. 1982. Presentation to the Pesticide Advisory Board: Public hearings on December 14th, Newcastle, N.B., Canada.
Coombs, D. 1985. Presentation to the Pesticide Advisory Board: Public hearings on November 18th, Woodstock, N.B., Canada.
Richardson, M., J. Sherman, and M. Gismondi. 1993. Winning back the words: Confronting experts in an environmental public hearing. Toronto: Garamond Press.
Modavi, N. 1996. Mediation of environmental conflicts in Hawaii: Win-win or co-optation? Sociological Perspectives 39:310–316.
Collette, W. 1989. The polluters’ “secret plan”. Arlington, Va.: Citizens’ Clearing House for Hazardous Wastes, Inc.
Solecki, W. 1995. Paternalism, pollution and protest in a company town. Political Geography 15:5–20.
Parsons, W. 1995. Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
Matland, R. 1995. Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Adminitration Research and Theory 5:145–174.
O’Leary, R. 1994. The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory 4:443–467.
Karlberg, M. 1997. News and conflict: How adversarial news frames limit public understand-ing of environmental issues. Alternatives 23:2227.
Birkeland. 1990. Tasmania: The story. Presented at Clayquot Sound Wilderness Conference, September 8, Vargas Island, B.C., Canada.
Doyle, T., and A. Kellow. 1995. Environmental politics and policymaking in Australia. South Melbourne: Macmillan.
Marcus, A. 1988. Risk, uncertainty, and scientific judgement. Minerva 26:138–152.
Goleman, D. 1985. Vital lies simple truths: The psychology of self-deception. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Smail, D. 1984. Illusion and reality: The meaning of anxiety. London: Dent & Sons.
Blades, K. 1995. Net d estruction: The death of Atlantic Canada’s fishery. Halifax, N.S.: Nimbus Publishing.
Neis, B., and S. Williams. 1997. The new global right, gender and the fisheries crisis: Local and global dimensions. Atlantis 21:47–62.
Neis, B. 1992. Fishers’ ecological knowledge and stock assessment in Newfoundland. Newfoundland Studies 8:155–178.
Hutchings, J., C. Walters, and R. Haedrich. 1997. Is scientific inquiry incompatible with government information control? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 54:1198–1210.
Enman, C. 1997. Science silenced to hide ‘disasters’: Top biologist says DFO suppressed evidence of calamitous errors. Ottawa Citizen June 27, Ottawa, Canada.
Enman, C. 1997. 36 scientists: End the suppression: Manifesto calls for the restoration of integrity within DFO. Ottawa Citizen July 4, Ottawa, Canada.
Canadian Press. 1997. Fish experts draw fiery response from Ottawa: Scientists who accuse Fisheries officials of deception prompt blistering denials. Globe and Mail June 25, Toronto, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, A. (1999). Pluralistic Competition. In: Environmental Problem Solving. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1440-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-40297-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1440-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive