Abstract
States of a quantum mechanical system are represented by rays in a complex Hilbert space. The space of rays has, naturally, the structure of a Uhler manifold. This leads to a geometrical formulation of the postulates of quantum mechanics which, although equivalent to the standard algebraic formulation, has a very different appearance. In particular, states are now represented by points of a symplectic manifold (which happens to have in addition a compatible Riemannian metric), observables are represented by certain real-valued functions on this space, and the Schrödinger evolution is captured by the symplectic flow generated by a Hamiltonian function. There is thus a remarkable similarity with the standard symplectic formulation of classical mechanics. Features such as uncertainties and state vector reductions—which are specific to quantum mechanics can also be formulated geometrically but now refer to the Riemannian metric—a structure which is absent in classical mechanics. The geometrical formulation sheds considerable light on a number of issues such as the second quantization procedure, the role of coherent states in semiclassical considerations, and the WKB approximation. More importantly, it suggests generalizations of quantum mechanics. The simplest among these are equivalent to the dynamical generalizations that have appeared in the literature. The geometrical reformulation provides a unified framework to discuss these and to correct a misconception. Finally, it also suggests directions in which more radical generalizations may be found.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,” Phys. Rev. D34, 470–491 (1986).
P. Pearle, “Combining stochastic dynamical state reduction with spontaneous localization,” Phys. Rev. A39, 2277–2289 (1989).
G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi and A. Rimini, “Continuous spontaneous reduction involving gravity,” Phys. Rev. A42, 1057–1064 (1990).
J. S. Bell, “Introduction to the hidden-variable question,” in Proceedings of the international school of physics Enrico Fermi, course IL: Foundations of quantum mechanics, (Academic Press, New York, 1971).
I. Bialynicki-Birula and J. Mycielski, “Nonlinear wave mechanics,” Ann. Phys. New York 100, 62–93 (1976).
P. Pearle, “Reduction of a state vector by a non-linear Schrödinger equation,” Phys. Rev. D13, 857–868 (1976).
S. Weinberg, “Testing quantum mechanics,” Ann. Phys. New York 194, 336–386 (1989).
P. Pearle, “Towards a relativistic theory of state vector reduction,” in Sixty-two years of uncertainty, Ed A. I. Miller (Plenum Press, New York, 1990).
J. S. Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
A. Ashtekar and J. Stachel, Conceptual problems of quantum gravity (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1991).
K. V. Kuchat, “Time and interpretations of quantum gravity,” in Proceedings of the 4th Canadian conference on general relativity and relativistic astrophysics, Eds. G. Kunstatter, D. Vincent, and J. Williams (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
C. J. Isham, “Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time,” in Integrable systems, quantum groups and quantum field theory, Eds. L. A. Ibart and M. A. Rodrigues (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992).
R. Penrose, Emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989).
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, “Classical equations for quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. D47, 3345–3382 (1993).
C. J. Isham, “Quantum logic and the histories approaches to quantum theory,” J. Math. Phys. 35, 2157–2185 (1994).
Troy A. Schilling, Geometry of quantum mechanics, doctoral thesis (The Pennsylvania State University 1996).
T. W. B. Kibble, “Geometrization of Quantum Mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys. 65, 189–201 (1979).
A. M. Perelomov, Generalized coherent states and their applications (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).
A. M. Perelomov, Commun. Math. Phys. 26, 222 (1972).
R. Gilmore, Ann. Phys. New York 74, 391 (1972).
J. R. Klauder1 Math. Phys. 4, 1055 (1963),i Math. Phys. 4, 1058 (1963).
R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and space-time, vol 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985).
A. Ashtekar, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Magnon-Ashtekar, “A generalization of tensor calculus and its applications to physics,” Gen. Rel. Gray. 14, 411–428 (1982).
A. Heslot, “Quantum mechanics as a classical theory,” Phys, Rev. D31, 1341–1348 (1985).
J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, “Geometry of quantum evolution,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1697–1700 (1990).
G. W. Gibbons, “Typical states and density matrices,” Jour. Geom. Phys. 8, 147–162 (1992).
L. P. Hughston, “Geometric aspects of quantum mechanics,” in Twistor Theory, Ed. S. A. Huggett, (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995).
L. P. Hughston, “Geometry of stochastic state vector reduction,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A452, 953–979 (1996).
R. Cirelli, A. Manià, and L. Pizzocchero, “Quantum mechanics as an infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian system with uncertainty structure: Part I,” J. Math. Phys. 31, 2891–2897 (1990).
R. Cirelli, A. Manià, and L. Pizzocchero, “Quantum mechanics as an infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian system with uncertainty structure: Part II,” J. Math. Phys. 31, 2898–2903 (1990).
P. R. Chernoff, J. E. Marsden, Properties of infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974).
R. ShankarPrinciples of quantum mechanics, Chapter 9 (Plenum Press, New York, 1980).
P. A. M. Dirac, Lectures in quantum mechanics (Yeshiva University Press, New York, 1964).
R. Geroch, “A method for generating solutions of Einstein’s equations,”J. Math. Phys. 12,918–924 (1971).
R. M. Wald, General relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon-Ashtekar, “A technique for analyzing the structure of isometries,” J. Math. Phys. 19, 1567–1572 (1978).
M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of modern mathematical physics, v. I, Functional analysis (Academic Press, 1980).
K. Yano, Structures on manifolds (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984).
W.-M. Zhang, “Coherent states: Theory and some applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867–927 (1990).
H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1981).
C. Lanczos, The variational principles of mechanics (Dover Publications, New York, 1970).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ashtekar, A., Schilling, T.A. (1999). Geometrical Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Harvey, A. (eds) On Einstein’s Path. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1422-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1422-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7137-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1422-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive