Advertisement

The Developing Scientist as Craftsperson

  • Michael Eisenberg
  • Ann Eisenberg
Part of the Modeling Dynamic Systems book series (MDS)

Abstract

Increasingly, the day-to-day practice of science education is pervaded by the presence of computational media. Simulations, modeling tools, and virtual laboratories have become the stock in trade of the up-to-date science educator. As a consequence, the young scientist is a person who, more and more, spends a large proportion of his or her time in abstract and nonphysical “worlds.” This move toward an increasingly virtualized science education has important benefits for some scientific domains and for some activities: Perhaps only through the simulation of especially complex systems can the student get a sense of how such systems are capable of behaving. Moreover, the real, physical world constrains us as human beings—and it may constrain our scientific imaginations as well. We cannot easily experience the frictionless environments that would make many principles of Newtonian mechanics more intuitive (Chapter 10; White and Horwitz, 1987; diSessa, 1982); we do not grasp the behavior of objects moving at speeds near that of light (Horwitz, 1994); we do not see firsthand the evolution of ecosystems, a phenomenon perhaps best understood at a time scale of millennia (Dawkins, 1996). In all these cases, the building and studying of virtual worlds, simulations, and abstract models may be a crucial step in the education of the scientist.

Keywords

Computational Element Hexagonal Prism Embed Computation Computational Medium Wearable Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abelson, H., & diSessa, A. 1980. Turtle geometry Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, J. 1993. Cranks, quarks, and the cosmos. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. 1993. Talented teenagers, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cundy, H. M., & Rollett, A. P. 1951. Mathematical Models. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dawkins, R. 1996. The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. diSessa, A. 1982. Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenberg, M. 1995. Programmable applications: Interpreter meets interface. SIGCHI Bulletin, 27:2, 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenberg, M., & DiBiase, J. 1996. Mathematical manipulatives as designed artifacts: The cognitive, affective, and technological dimensions. Proceedings of the Inter-national Conference on the Learning Sciences, 1996, Chicago, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, M., & Nishioka, A. 1997a. Orihedra: Mathematical sculptures in paper. In-ternational Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1 (3), 225–261.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, M. & Nishioka, A. 1997. Creating polyhedral models by computer. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16 (4), 477–511.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenberg, M., & Eisenberg, A. 1998a. Shop class for the next millennium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, M., & Eisenberg, A. 1999. Middle tech: Blurring the division between high and low tech in education. In A. Druin, ed., The Design of Children’s Technology, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 244–273.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, M., & Eisenberg, A. 1998c. Designing real-time software “advisors” for 3d spatial operations. In preparation.Google Scholar
  15. Feynman R. 1985. “Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!” New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbertson, R. 1993. Muscle wires project book. San Rael, CA: Mondo-Tronics.Google Scholar
  17. Hilton, P., & Pedersen, J. 1994. Build your own polyhedra. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Horwitz, P., Taylor, E. F., & Barowy, W. 1994. Teaching special relativity with a computer. Computers in Physics, 8, 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, G., & Wild, A. 1985. Making Shapes, vols. 1, 2, and 3. Diss, England: Tarquin.Google Scholar
  20. Lightman, A., & Brawer, R. 1990. Origins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Malkevitch, J. 1988. Milestones in the history of polyhedra. In Senechal, M., and Fleck, G. (eds.), Shaping space: A polyhedral approach. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, S. 1997. Wearable computing: A first step toward personal imaging IEEE Com-puter, 30 (2), 25–32.Google Scholar
  23. Mehra, J. 1994. The beat of a different drum: The life and science of Richard Feynman. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Pedersen, J. 1988. “Why study polyhedra?” In Senechal, M., and Fleck, G. (eds.), Shap-ing space: A polyhedral approach. Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
  25. Resnick, M. 1993. Behavior construction kits. Communications of the ACM, 36 (7), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Resnick, M., Martin, F., Sargent, R., & Silverman, B. 1996. Programmable bricks: Toys to think with. IBM Systems Journal, 35 (3), 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White, M., & Gribbin, J. 1992. Stephen Hawking: A life in science. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  28. White, B., & Horwitz, P. 1987. ThinkerTools: Enabling children to understand physical laws. Report No. 6470, BBN Laboratories.Google Scholar
  29. Whitehead, A. N. 1929. The aims of education. New York: Mentor Books (printed in 1949 ).zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Eisenberg
  • Ann Eisenberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations