Abstract
Starting in the early 1990s, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, and more than 85% of all patients are now treated this way. Among these patients a proportion of 7–20% suffer from choledocholithiasis.1 The preoperative clinical and laboratory evaluation of possibly coexisting common bile duct (CBD) pathology is therefore important for making the appropriate management decision. The management of CBD stones has changed considerably. Therapeutic endoscopy has become firmly established as the most effective minimally invasive approach to CBD stones, and it is now preferable to surgery in the majority of patients. Laparoscopic CBD exploration was the logical extension of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as experience and laparoscopic technology has grown. The advent of laparoscopic techniques for CBD stone treatment has introduced the alternative of a single-stage treatment for these patients, and it has given rise to debate regarding the optimal management of choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic surgery has improved the management of gallbladder stones in many aspects, and, after the extension of laparoscopic techniques to common duct pathology, many questions have arisen regarding the proper CBD stone treatment. It is not clear now whether the management of these patients should be conducted in two stages [preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) followed by LC], or as a one-stage surgical procedure with ductal stone extraction being performed at the time of LC. This chapter will focus on some of the controversies in the management of ductal stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and an attempt will be made to give some guidelines to the optimal therapy of patients with gallbladder and common duct stones in the era of laparoscopic surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hermann RE. The spectrum of biliary stone disease. Am J Surg 1989;158:171–173.
Soctt MA, Farrands PA, Guyer PB, et al. Ultrasound of the common bile duct in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. JCU J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:73–76.
Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, et al. Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators: a prospective evaluation. Ann Surg 1985;202:64–68.
Goodman MW, Ansel HJ, Vennes JA, et al. Is intravenous cholangiography still useful? Gastroenterology 1980;79:642–645.
Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, et al. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1992;24:745–749.
Mofti AB, Ahmed I, Tandon RC, et al. Routine or selective preoperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 1986;73:548–550.
Perissat J, Huibregste K, Keane FBV, et al. Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:799–810.
White TT, Hart MJ. Cholangiography and small duct injury. Am J Surg 1985;149:640–643.
Jakimowitcz JJ, Ruten H, Jurgens PJ, et al. Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi. World J Surg 1987;11:628–634.
Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1,000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989;2:431–434.
Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and non dilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1068–1075.
Cotton PB. Treatment of choledocholithiasis: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:474–478.
Hermann RE. A plea for a safer technique of cholecystectomy. Surgery 1976;79:609–611.
Fink AS. Current dilemmas in management of common duct stones. Surg Endosc 1993;7:285–291.
Petelin JB. Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Am J Surg 1993;165:487–491.
Martin IG, Curley P, McMahon MJ. Minimally invasive treatment for common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1993;80:103–106.
Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. BMJ 1987;294:470–474.
Heinerman PM, Boeckl O, Pimpi W. Selective ERCP and preoperative stone removal in bile duct surgery. Ann Surg 1989;209:267–272.
Bonatsos G, Leandros E, Polydorou A, et al. ERCP in association with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a strategy to minimize the number of unnecessary ERCP’s. Surg Endosc 1996;10:37–40.
Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A, et al. EAES ductal stone co-operative group. EAES ductal stone study. Surg Endosc 1996;11:30–35.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polydorou, A.A. (1999). Common Bile Duct Stones: Endoscopic Extraction or Laparoscopic Management. In: Merrell, R.C., Olson, R.M. (eds) Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1408-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1408-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7132-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1408-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive