Nonstandard Extension of H-Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems

  • Hua Xu
  • Koichi Mizukami
Part of the Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games book series (AISDG, volume 5)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a nonstandard extension of the H -optimal control problem for singularly perturbed systems and relax the nonsingularity conditions made in the paper of Pan and Başar [11] We prove that all the results concerning the composite controller in the paper above still hold true even if the system is a nonstandard singularly perturbed system. We show that the composite optimal controller, which guarantees a disturbance attenuation level larger than the upper bound of the full-order system when ε is sufficiently small, can be constructed very simply by only revising a slow controller. This paper also provides a concise procedure to construct the composite controller. Some numerical examples, which can not be solved using the method of the above paper, are presented to illustrate the theoretical results.

Keywords

Attenuation Guaran 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Başar, T. and P. Bernhard. H -Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems: A Dynamic Game ApproachBirkhäuser, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Dai, L. Singular Control Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (M. Thoma and A. Wyner, eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Drăgan, V Asymptotic Expansions for Game-Theoretic Riccati Equations and Stabilization with Disturbance Attenuation for Singularly Perturbed Systems. Systems & Control Letters, 20,455–463,1993.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Drăgan, V H -Norms and Disturbance Attenuation for Systems with Fast Transients. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-41, 747–750, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fridman, E. Exact Decomposition of Linear Singularly Perturbed H -Optimal Control Problem. Kybernetika, 31, 589–597, 1995.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Fridman, E. Near-Optimal H Control of Linear Singularly Perturbed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-41, 236–240, 1996.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Khalil, H. K. Feedback Control of Nonstandard Singularly Perturbed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-34, 1052–1060, 1989.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Khalil, H. K. and F. Chen. H -Control of Two-Time-Scale Systems. Systems & Control Letters, 19, 35–42, 1992.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kokotović, P. V. and R. A. Yackel. Singular Perturbation of Linear Regulators: Basic Theorems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-17, 29–37, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kokotović, P. V., H. K. Khalil, and J. O’Reilly. Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design. Academic Press, New York, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Pan, Z. and T. Başar. H -Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems. Part I: Perfect State Measurements. Automatica, 29, 401–423, 1993.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Pan, Z. and T. Başar. Time-Scale Separation and Robust Controller Design for Uncertain Nonlinear Singularly Perturbed Systems under Perfect State Measurements. International journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 6, 585–608, 1996.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Wang, Y. Y, S. J. Shi and Z. J. Zhang. A Descriptor-System Approach to Singular Perturbation of Linear Regulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-33, 370–373, 1988.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Xu, H. and K. Mizukami. On the Isaacs Equation of Differential Games for Descriptor Systems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 83, 405–419, 1994.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Xu, H. and K. Mizukami. Nonstandard Extension of H -Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems, Proceedings of the 7 th International Symposium on Dynamic Games and Applications, 2, 931–948, 1996.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Yackel, R. A. and P. V. Kokotović. A Boundary Layer Method for the Matrix Riccati Equation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC–18, 17–24, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hua Xu
    • 1
  • Koichi Mizukami
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Systems ManagementThe University of TsukubaTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Integrated Arts and SciencesHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations