Skip to main content

Refinement of the Nash Solution for Games with Perfect Information

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications

Part of the book series: Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games ((AISDG,volume 5))

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

The n-person finite games with perfect information are considered. It is well known that the subgame perfectness assumption does not lead to the unique Nash equilibria (NE). Thus the problem arises of how to choose a unique subgame perfect NE. It is proved that by introducing the so-called “preference vector” for each player a unique subgame (in the sense of payoffs) NE can be constructed. The application of the approach to the “lifeline” simple pursuit game with one pursuer and two evaders enables us to find a unique subgame (in the sense of payoffs) NE in this differential game also.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nash, J.F. Equilibrium Points in n-Points Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 36,48–49, 1950.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Isaaks, R. Differential Games. Wiley, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrosjan, L. A. On a Family of Differential Games of Survival in R n . Soviet Mathematics Doklady. 161, 1, 52–54, 1965.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dutkevich, Y. G. and L. A. Petrosjan. Games with “Life-Line.” The Case of l-Capture. SIAM Journal of Control, 10, 1,40–47, 1972.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreele, W. Learning in a Class of Non-Zero-Sum Two-Person Games. Part I, Discussion Paper NB-182. Bonn University, Bonn, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ambargan, V. S. The Definition of Capture Points, When P Start the Pursuit with Time Delay. Doklady of the Armenian Academy of Sciences, 6, 92,4,147–153,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Selten, R. Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Form Games. Internationaljournal of Game Theory, 4, 22–55, 1975.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Harsanyi, J. C. Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Baysesian” Players, Parts I, II and III. Management Science, 14, 159–182, 320–332,468–502,1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Damme, E. E. C. Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petrosjan, L.A. (2000). Refinement of the Nash Solution for Games with Perfect Information. In: Filar, J.A., Gaitsgory, V., Mizukami, K. (eds) Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games, vol 5. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1336-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1336-9_14

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7100-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1336-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics