Skip to main content

Quantum Ontologies: Metaphysics in Modern Physics

  • Chapter
The Conscious Universe
  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

The insurmountable problem in preserving the classical view of correspondence in the face of the evidence disclosed by Bell’s theorem and the recent experiments testing that theorem has been defined by physicist Henry Stapp. The simultaneous correlations of results between space-like separated regions in the Aspect experiments indicate that nonlocality is a fact of nature. However, one cannot posit any causal connection between these regions in the absence of faster-than-light communication. As Stapp put it:

No metaphysics not involving faster-than-light propagation of influences has been proposed that can account for all of the predictions of quantum mechanics, except for the so-called many-worlds interpretation, which is objectionable on other grounds. Since quantum physicists are generally reluctant to accept the idea that there are faster-than-light influences, they are left with no metaphysics to promulgate.1

...May god us keep

From single Vision and Nnewton’sleep!

William Blake

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Henry P. Stapp, “Quantum Theory and the Physicist’s Conception of Nature: Philosophical Implications of Bell’s Theorem,” in The World View of Contemporary Physics, ed. Richard E. Kitchener (Albany, N.Y.: S.U.N.Y. Press, 1988 ), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. lbid., p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Henry P. Stapp, “Quantum Ontologies,” in Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe( Dordrecht, Holland. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989 ), pp. 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order( London: Routeledge and Kegan Paul, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. lbid.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henry P. Stapp, “Quantum Ontologies,” p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. lbid., p. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henry P. Stapp, “Why Classical Mechanics Cannot Naturally Accommodate Consciousness But Quantum Mechanics Can,” Noetic Journal, 1997, pp. 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roger Penrose, Shadows of the Mind( New York: Oxford University Press, 1994 ), p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roger Penrose, “Precis of The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics,” Behavioral Sciences, 1990, 13, p. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Bohm, “Interview,” Omni, January, 1987, 9, pp. 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kafatos, M., Nadeau, R. (2000). Quantum Ontologies: Metaphysics in Modern Physics. In: The Conscious Universe. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1308-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1308-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98865-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1308-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics