Skip to main content

Canonical Correlation Analysis

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Procedures

  • Alpert, M.I., Peterson, R.A. and Martin, W.S. 1975. Testing the significance of canonical correlations. Proceedings of the American Marketing Association 37:117–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcikowski, R.S., and Stevens, J.P. 1975. A Monte Carlo study of the stability of canonical correlations, canonical weights and canonical variate-variable correlations. Multivariate Behavioral Research 10:353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M.S. 1941. The statistical significance of canonical correlations. Biometrika 32:29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W.R., and Goldstein, M. 1984. Multivariate Methods: Methods and Applications. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPillo, P.J. 1976. The application of bias to discriminant analysis. Communications in Statistics. A Theory and Methods 5:834–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., Jr., and Chase, G.B. 1974. Fitting the Gaussian curve to ecological data. Ecology 55:1377–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., Jr., and Wentworth, T.R. 1976. Canonical correlation analysis as an ordination technique. Vegetatio 33:17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.H. 1981. The use and misuse of statistics in wildlife habitat studies. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 11–19. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettenring, J.R. 1971. Canonical analysis of several sets of variables. Biometrika 58:433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D.N. 1959. Tests of significance in canonical analysis. Biometrika 46:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M.S. 1977. Canonical Analaysis and Factor Comparison. Sage University paper series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-006. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M., and Minc, H. 1968. Elementary Linear Algebra. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, L.L. 1981. A discussion of robust procedures in multivariate analysis. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 242–242. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, J.J. 1965. Canonical analysis: some relations between canonical correlation, factor analysis, discriminant function analysis, and scaling theory. Psychometric Monograph 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meents, J.K., Rice, J., Anderson, B.W., and Ohmart, R.D. 1983. Nonlinear relationships between birds and vegetation. Ecology 64:1022–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I., Walker, D., and Williams, W.T. 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. Journal of Ecology 63:779–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, R.K., and McDonald, L.L. 1976. Ridge discriminant analysis. Technical Report No. 108, Department of Statistics, University of Wyoming, Laramie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.G. 1981. Canonical correlation analysis and its use in wildlife habitat studies. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 80–92. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D.K., and Love, W.A. 1968. A general canonical correlation index. Psychological Bulletin 70:160–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R.M. 1978. Correlation Procedures for Research. New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R.M., and Weiss, D.J. 1973. A study of the stability of canonical correlations and canonical components. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg, A.L. van den. 1977. Redundancy analysis: an alternative for canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 41:207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Applications

  • Andries, A.M., Gulinck, H., and Herremans, M. 1994. Spatial modelling of the barnowl (Tyto alba) habitat using landscape characteristics derived from SPOT data. Ecography 17(3):278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkham, J.P., and Norris, J.M. 1970. Multivariate procedures in an investigation of vegetation and soil relations of two beech woodlands, Cotswold Hills, England. Ecology 51:630–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, D.E., Jr., Costa, R., Hooper, R.G., and Hess, C.A. 1996. Habitat quality and reproduction of red-cockaded woodpecker groups in Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 60(4):826–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, M.S. 1981. Robust canonical correlation of sage grouse habitat. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 152–159. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoon, R.E., and Jameson, D.L. 1970. Canonical correlation between variation in weather and variation in size in the Pacific tree frog, Hyla regilla, in southern California. Copeia 1970:124–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, B.A., and Slade, N.A. 1982. Some comments on niche analysis in canonical space. Ecology 63(4):888–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, L.J., Jr. 1981. Ecological relationships of grassland birds to habitat and food supply in East Africa. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 160–166. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 1978. Ecological correlates of residence and non-residence in a Mediterranean passerine bird community. Journal of Animal Ecology 47:871–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human, K.G., Weiss, S., Weiss, A., Sandler, B., and Gordon, D.M. 1998. Effects of abiotic factors on the distribution and activity of the invasive Argentine ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 27(4):822–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F.C., and Porter, W.P. 1979. Behavior-microclimatic relationships in the African rainbow lizard, Agama agama. Copeia 1979:585–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D.L., Mackey, J.P., and Anderson, M. 1973. Weather, climate, and the external morphology of Pacific tree toads. Evolution 27:285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, C.D. 1978. The distributions of estuarine diatoms along environmental gradients: a canonical correlation. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 6:447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poore, G.C.B., and Mobley, M.C. 1980. Canonical correlation analysis of marine macrobenthos survey data. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 45:37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, T., and Jameson, D.L. 1970. Chronological correlation between change in weather and change in morphology of the Pacific tree frog in southern California. Copeia 1970:135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weixelman, D.A., Zamudio, D.C., Zamudio, K.A., and Tausch, R.J. 1997. Classifying ecological types and evaluating site degradation. Journal of Range Management 50(3):315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, W., Hudson, R.J., and McLean, A. 1979. Assessment of variability among diets of individual deer with the aid of canonical analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57(10):1856-1862.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGarigal, K., Stafford, S., Cushman, S. (2000). Canonical Correlation Analysis. In: Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1288-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1288-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98642-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1288-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics