Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discriminant Analysis

  • Chapter
Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Procedures

  • Carnes, B.A., and Slade, N.A. 1982. Some comments on niche analysis in canonical space. Ecology 63:888–893 (see also Dueser and Shugart 1979 and 1982; and Van Home and Ford 1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education Psychology Measurements 20:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W.W., and Lohnes, P.R. 1971. Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E.S. 1987. Randomization Tests, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 1979. Computers and the theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) Review 21:460–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Monograph #38, CBMS-NSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and Gong, G. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. American Statistician 37:36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7:179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.E., Massy, W.F., and Morrison, D.G. 1965. Bias in multiple discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 2:250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M., and Dillon, W.R. 1978. Discrete Discriminant Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. 1978. Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. 1971. A multivariate statistical approach to the Hutchinsonian niche: bivalve mollusca of central Canada. Ecology 52:543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.H. 1974. Multivariate niche analysis with temporally varying environmental factors. Ecology 55:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbema, J.D.F., and Hermans, J. 1977. Selection of variables in discriminant analysis by F-statistic and error rate. Technometrics 19:487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Jr., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R.L. 1987. Multivariate Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, E.J., and Whitmore, R.C. 1977. Multivariate measures of niche overlap using discriminant analysis. Theoretical Population. Biology. 12:21–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.J. 1975. A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, I.F., Russell, J.S. and Moore, A.W. 1968. Multivariate-covariance and canonical analysis: a method for selecting the most effective discriminators in a multivariate situation. Biometrics 24:845–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudlet, R., and Johnson, R. 1977. Linear discrimination and some further results on best lower dimensional representations. In Classification and Clustering, ed. J.V. Ryzin. pp 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.H. 1981. How to measure—a statistical perspective. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 53–58. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachigan, S.K. 1982. Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Introduction. New York: Adius Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka, W.R. 1980. Discriminant analysis. Sage University Paper series. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-019. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. 1977. The performance of Fisher’s linear discriminant function under non-optimal conditions. Technometrics 19:191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachenbruch, P.A. 1975. Discriminant Analysis. New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachenbruch, P.A., and Goldstein, M. 1979. Discriminant analysis. Biometrics 35:69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachenbruch, P.A., Sneeringer, C., and Revo, L.T. 1973. Robustness of the linear and quadratic discriminant functions to certain types of non-normality. Communications in Statistics 1:39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H. 1960. Robust test for equality of variances. In Probability and Statistics, ed. I. Olkin, pp 278–292. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalanobis, P.C. 1963. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings National Institute of Science, India 12:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, M., and Minc, H. 1968. Elementary Linear Algebra. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, L.L. 1981. A discussion of robust procedures in multivariate analysis. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 242–244. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.G. 1969. On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 6:156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D.F. 1976. Multivariate Statistical Methods, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M.L. 1984. Influence of sample size on discriminant function analysis of habitat use by birds. Journal Field Ornithology 55:330–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., and Bush, R.R. 1954. Selective quantitative techniques. In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, ed. G. Lindzey. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, W.D., Jr., Behrman, D.N., and Armstrong, G.M. 1979. Alternative approaches for interpretation of multiple discriminant analysis in marketing research. Journal of Business 7:151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randies, R.H. 1978. Generalized linear and quadratic discriminant functions using robust estimates. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 73:564–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, M.M. 1970. Discriminant analysis: the study of group differences. Selected Topics in Advanced Statistics—An Elementary Approach. Number 6. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, K., Mosher, J.A., and Williams, B.K. 1984. Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: ecological applications. The American Midlands Naturalist 111:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, P.W., and Kronmal, R.A. 1977. Discriminant functions when covariances are unequal and sample sizes are moderate. Biometrics 33:479–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. 1981. Discriminant analysis in wildlife research: theory and applications. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 59–71. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. 1982. A simple demonstration of the relationship between classification and canonical variates analysis. American Statistician 36:363–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K. 1983. Some observations on the use of discriminant analysis in ecology. Ecology 64:1283–1291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.K., and Titus, K. 1988. Assessment of sampling stability in ecological applications of discriminant analysis. Ecology 69:1275–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Home, B., and Ford, R.G. 1982. Niche breadth calculation based on discriminant analysis. Ecology 63:1172–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ness, J.W., and Simpson, C. 1976. On the effects of dimension in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 18:175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J.M., and Dunn, O.J. 1966. Elimination of variates in linear discrimination problems. Biometrics 22:268–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Applications

  • Able, K.P., and Noon, B.R. 1976. Avian community structure along elevational gradients in the northeastern United States. Ecologia 26:275–294 (use with Noon 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S.H., and Shugart, H.H. Jr. 1974. Habitat selection of breeding birds in an east Tennessee deciduous forest. Ecology 55:828–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, R.I. 1977. Breeding habitats of the wood thrush and veery. Condor 79:303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, W.M., Morrison, M.L., and Scott, P.E. 1998. Development and evaluation of habitat models for herpetofauna and small mammals. Forest Science 44(3):430–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechner, H.K., and Roth, H.D. 1974. The lek system in Uganda kob antelope. American Zoologist 14:145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzas, M.A. 1967. An application of canonical analysis as a method for comparing faunal areas. Journal of Animal Ecology 36:563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. 1978. Habitat selection and interspecific territoriality among the sylviid warblers of England and Sweden. Ecological Monographs 48:351–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, W. 1976. Competition between Microtus: a behavioral hypothesis. Ecology 57:224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, R.N., and Adkisson, C.S. 1976. Discriminant function analysis: a possible aid in determining the impact of forest management on woodpecker nesting habitat. Forest Science 22:122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M.J., Gysel, L.W., and Dudderer, E.K. 1979. Habitat components of clear-cut areas for snowshoe hares in Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Management 43:680–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, K.A., and Morzuch, B.J. 1981. A descriptive model of snowshoe hare habitat. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 232–241. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, H.S., Hooper, R.G. and Titterington, R.W. 1981. Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:680–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dueser, R.D., and Shugart, H.H., Jr. 1978. Microhabitats in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 59:89–98 (use with Dueser and Shugart 1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dueser, R.D., and Shugart, H.H., Jr. 1979. Niche pattern in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Ecology 60:108–118 (use with Dueser and Shugart 1978; see also Van Home and Ford 1982; Carnes and Slade 1982; and Dueser and Shugart 1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dueser, R.D., and Shugart, H.H., Jr. 1982. Reply to comments by Van Home and Ford and by Carnes and Slade. Ecology 63:1174–1175 (see also Dueser and Shugart 1979; Van Home and Ford 1982; and Carnes and Slade 1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, A.H., and Haworth, P.F. 1995. Testing the generality of bird-habitat models. Conservation Biology 9(6):1466–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldingay, R.L., and Price, M.V. 1997. Influence of season and a sympatric congener on habitat use by Stephen’s kangaroo rat. Conservation Biology 11(3):708–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R.A., and Grigal, D.F. 1972. Definition of vegetation structure by canonical analysis. Journal of Ecology, 60:277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigal, D.F., and Goldstein, R.A. 1971. An integrated ordination-classification analysis of an intensively sampled oak-hickory forest. Journal of Ecology 59:481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grue, C.E., Reid, R.R. and Silvy, N.J. 1981. A windshield and multivariate approach to the classification, inventory and evaluation of wildlife habitat: an exploratory study. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 124–151. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, P.E. 1983. Use of discriminant function to characterize ruffed grouse drumming sites in Georgia: a reply. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, P.E., Johnson, A.S., and Landers, J.L. 1982. Characteristics of ruffed grouse drumming sites in Georgia. Journal of Wildlife Management. 46:115–123 (see also Magnusson 1983 and Hale 1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, E.J., and Whitmore, R.C. 1981. Robust principal component and discriminant analysis of two grassland bird species’ habitat. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 209–221. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F.C. 1971. Ordinations of habitat relationships among breeding birds. Wilson Bulletin. 83:215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, E.E., Demarais, S., Sell, S.M., and Lerich, S.P. 1998. Modeling habitat suitability for small mammals in Chihuahuan desert foothills of New Mexico. Journal of Wildlife Management 62(3):989–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, R.R., Lechowicz, M.J. and Adams, M.G. 1972. The use of canonical response curves in physiological ecology. Flora 165:29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladine, T.A., and Ladine, A. 1998. A multiscale approach to capture patterns and habitat correlations of Peromyscus leucopus (Rodentia, Muridae). Brimleyana 25:99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J., Strech, J., and Scheibe, K.M. 1998. Characteristic activity patterns of female mouflons (Ovis orientalis musimon) in the lambing period. Applied Animal Behavior Science 58(3–4):281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maehr, D.S. and Cox, J.A. 1995. Landscape features and panthers in Florida. Conservation Biology 9(5):1008–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, W.E. 1983. Useof discriminant function to characterize ruffed grouse drumming sites in Georgia: a critique. Journal of Wildlife Management. 47:1151–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, S.J., and Jones, M.J. 1997. The nesting requirements of the parrots and hornbill of Sumba, Indonesia. Biological Conservation 82(3):279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinka, R.P. 1972. Structural characteristics of blue grouse territories in southwestern Montana. Journal of Wildlife Management 36:498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massolo, A. and Meriggi, A. 1998. Factors affecting habitat occupancy by wolves in northern Apennines (northern Italy): a model of habitat suitability. Ecography 21(2):97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanucci, R.R. 1978. Discriminant analysis of hybridization between leopard lizards, Gambelia (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). Journal of Herpetology 12:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noon, B.R. 1981. The distribution of an avian guild along a temperate elevational gradient: the importance and expression of competition. Ecological Monographs 51:105–124 (use with Able 1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J.M., and Barkham, J.P. 1970. A comparison of some Cotswold beechwoods using multiple-discriminant analysis. Journal of Ecology. 58:603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.G. 1981. Interspecific differences in nesting habitat of sympatric woodpeckers and nuthatches. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 142–151. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, D.A., and Welsh, H.H. 1998. Habitat use by western pond turtles in the Trinity River, California. Journal of Wildlife Management 62(3):842–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.C. 1978a. Behavioral interactions of interspecifically territorial vireos. I. Song discrimination and natural interactions. Animal Behaviour 26:527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.C. 1978b. Behavioral interactions of interspecifically territorial vireos. II. Seasonal variation in response intensity. Animal Behaviour 26:550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.C., Ohmart, R.D., and Anderson, B. 1981. Bird community use of riparian habitats: the importance of temporal scale in interpreting discriminant analysis. In The Use of Multivariate Statistics in Studies on Wildlife Habitat, ed. D.E. Capen, pp 186–196. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E. 1977. A discriminant function analysis of assemblages of fruit-eating birds in Central America. Condor 79:228–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogovin, K.A., and Shenbrot, G.I. 1995. Geographical ecology of Mongolian desert rodent communities. Journal of Biogeography 22(1) 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai, H.F., and Noon, B.R. 1991. Nest-site characteristics of Hammond’s and Pacific-slope flycatchers in northwestern California. Condor 93:563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.G. 1977. Distribution of summer birds along a forest moisture gradient in an Ozark watershed. Ecology 58:810–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squibb, R.C., and Hunt, G.L., Jr. 1983. A comparison of nesting-ledges used by seabirds on St. George Island. Ecology 64:727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, K.A. 1998. Assessing the population structure of the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) by discriminant analysis. Marine Mammal Science 14(3):646–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomblin, D.C., and Adler, G.H. 1998. Differences in habitat use between two morphologically similar tropical forest rodents. Journal of Mammalogy 79(3):953–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Home, B., and Ford, R.G. 1982. Niche breadth calculation based on discriminant analysis. Ecology 63:1172–1174 (see also Dueser and Shugart 1979 and 1982; and Carnes and Slade 1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, H.H., and Lind, A.J. 1995. Habitat correlates of the Del Norte salamander, Plethodon elongatus (Caudata, Plethodontidae), in northwestern California. Journal of Herpetology 29(2):198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003-5810, USA

    Kevin McGarigal

  2. Department of Forest Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1470, USA

    Susan Stafford

  3. Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003-5810, USA

    Sam Cushman

Authors
  1. Kevin McGarigal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Stafford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sam Cushman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McGarigal, K., Stafford, S., Cushman, S. (2000). Discriminant Analysis. In: Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1288-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1288-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98642-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1288-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation