Skip to main content

Peritonitis: Management of the Patient with SIRS and MODS

  • Chapter
Multiple Organ Failure
  • 369 Accesses

Abstract

Peritonitis continues to be a complex illness that requires the coordinated efforts of timely surgical intervention, systemic antibiotic therapy, and supportive critical care management. Peritonitis and its accompanying sequela of intraabdominal abscess are frequently associated with activation of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and is commonly associated with the development of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Many authors consider peritonitis to be the prototypical infection associated with MODS, although there is general consensus at the present time that any infectious source could potentially activate SIRS and lead to MODS.1 The general perception is that effective intervention in the initial management of patients with peritonitis can avoid subsequent evolution of the multiple organ failure cascade. Some have reported reversal of organ failure with surgical intervention in intraabdominal infection.2–4 This chapter summarizes the significant aspects of the treatment of the complex constellation of diseases called peritonitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deutsehman CS, Komstantinides FN, Tsai M, et al: Physiology and metabolism in isolated viral septicemia; further evidence of an organism-independent, host-dependent response, Arch Surg 1987; 122: 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eiseman B, Beart R, Norton L: Multiple organ failure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 144: 323–326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Polk HC Jr., Shields CL: Remote organ failure: a valid sign of occult intra-abdominal infection. Surgery 1977; 81: 310–313.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hinsdale JG, Jaffe BM: Reoperation for intraabdominal sepsis: indications and results in modern critical care setting. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 31–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoefs JC, Runyon BA: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Dis Mon 1985; 31: 1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosdell DM, Morris DM, Voltura A, et al: Antibiotic treatment for surgical peritonitis. Ann Surg 1991; 214: 543–549.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Autio V: The spread of intraperitoneal infection: studies with roentgen contrast medium. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1964; 321: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen L, Weatherford T: Role of fenestrated basement membrane in lymphatic absorption from the peritoneal cavity. Am J Physiol 1956; 197: 551–554.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsilibary EC, Wissig SL: Absorption from the peritoneal cavity: SEM study of the mesothelium covering the peritoneal surface of the muscular portion of the diaphragm. Am J Anat 1977; 149: 127–132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polk HG Jr., Miles AA: Enhancement of bacterial infection by ferric iron: kinetics, mechanisms, and surgical significance. Surgery 1971; 70: 71–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pruett TL, Rotstein OD, Fiegel VD, et al: Mechanisms of the adjuvant effect of hemoglobin in experimental peritonitis. VII. A leukotoxin is produced by Escherichia coli metabolism in hemoglobin. Surgery 1984; 96: 375–383.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fry DE, Garrison RN, Heitsch RG, et al: Determinants of death in patients with intraabdominal abscess. Surgery 1980; 89: 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chetlin SH, Elliott DW: Biliary bacteremia. Arch Surg 1971; 102: 303–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Onderdonk AB, Bardett JC, Louie T, et al: Microbial synergy in experimental intraabdominal abscess. Infect Immun 1976; 13: 22–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorber B, Swenson RM: The bacteriology of intraabdominal infections. Surg Clin North Am 1975; 55: 1349–1358.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bennion RS, Baron EJ, Thompson Jr. JE, et al: The bacteriology of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis-revisited. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Christou NV, Turgeon P, Wassef R, et al: Management of intraabdominal infections: the case for intraoperative cultures and comprehensive broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 1193–1201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheckman P, Onderdonk AB, Bartlett JG: Anaerobes in spontaneous peritonitis. Lancet 1977; 2: 1223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Donovan AJ, Berne TV, Donovan JA: Perforated duodenal ulcer: an alternative plan. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 1166–1171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurme T, Nylano E: Conservative versus operative treatment of appendicular abscess: experience of 147 consecutive patients. Ann Chir Gynecol 1995; 84: 33–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodeheaver GT, Pettry D, Thacker JG, et al: Wound cleansing by high pressure irrigation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975; 141: 357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hudspeth AS: Radical surgical debridement in the treatment of advanced generalized bacterial peritonitis. Arch Surg 1975; 110: 1233–1236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Polk HC Jr., Fry DE: Radical peritoneal debridement for established peritonitis. Ann Surg 1980; 192: 350–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stone HH, Hooper CA, Millikan WJ Jr.: Abdominal drainage following appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 606–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Atkins RC, Scott DF, Holdsworth SR, et al: Prolonged antibiotic peritoneal lavage in the management of gross generalized peritonitis. Med J Aust 1976; 1: 954.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephen M, Loewenthal J: Continuing peritoneal lavage in highrisk peritonitis. Surgery 1979; 85: 604–606.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uden P, Eskilsson P, Brunes L, et al: A clinical evaluation of postoperative peritoneal lavage in the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 348–349.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leiboff AR, Soroff HS: The treatment of generalized peritonitis by closed postoperative peritoneal lavage. Arch Surg 1987; 122: 1005–1010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobrin PB, O’Keefe P, Tatarowicz W, et al: The value of continuous 72-hour peritoneal lavage for peritonitis. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 368–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fry DE, Trachtenburg L, Polk HC Jr.: Serum kinetics of intraperitoneal moxalactam. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 282–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Brasel KJ, Borgstrom DC, Weigelt JA: Cost-utility analysis of contaminated appendectomy wounds. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 184: 23–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Malangoni MA, Condon RE, Spiegel CA: Treatment of intraadbominal infections is appropriate with single-agent or combination antibiotic therapy. Surgery 1985; 98: 648–655.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huizinga WK, Baker LW, Kadwa H, et al: Management of severe intra-abdominal sepsis: single agent antibiotic therapy with cefotetan versus combination therapy with ampicillin, gentamicin, and metronidazole. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 1134–1138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Harding G, Vincelette J, Rachlis A, et al: A preliminary report on the use of ceftizoxime versus clindamycin-tobramycin for the therapy of intraabdominal and pelvic infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10(Suppl C): 191–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walker AP, Nichols RL, Wilson RF, et al: Efficacy of a beta-kctam inhibitor combination for icrious intraabdominal infections. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dougherty SH, Sirinik KR, Schauer PB, et al: Ticarcillin/clavulanate compared with clindamycin/gentamicin (with or without ampicillin) for the treatment of intraabdominal infection in pediatric and adult patients. Am Surg 1995; 61: 297–303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Arguedas A, Sifuentes-Osornis J, Loaiza C, et al: An open, multicenter clinical trial of piperacillin/tazobactum in the treatment of pediatric patients with intraabdominal infections. J Chemother 1996; 8: 130–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Solomkin JS, Dellinger EP, Christou NV, Busuttil RW: Results of a multicenter trial comparing imipenem/cilastatin to tobramycin/clindamycin for intraabdominal infections. Ann Surg 1990; 212: 581–591.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Geroulanos SJ: Meropenem versus imipenem/cilaitatin in intraabdominal infections requiring surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36(Suppl A): 191–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Donahue PE, Smith DL, Yellin AE, et al: Trovafloxacin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, multicenter comparison with imipenem/cilastatin. Am J Surg 1998; 176(Suppl 6A): 53S–61S.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Barboza E, del Castillo M, Yi A, Gotuzzo E: Clindamycin plus amikacin versus clindamycin plus aztreonam in established intraabdominal infection. Surgery, 1994; 116: 28–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Solomkin JS, Reinhardt HH, Dellinger EP, et al: Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infection. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 303–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bohnen JMA, Solomkin JS, Dellinger EP, et al: Guidelines for clinical care: anti-infective agents for intra-abdominal infection. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 83–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Anonymous: Prospective, randomized comparison of metronidazole and clindamycin, each with gentamicin for the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infection. Surgery 1983; 93: 221-229.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Niemiec PW, Allo MD, Miller CF: Effect of altered volume of distribution on aminoglycoside levels in patients in surgical intensive care. Arch Surg 1987; 122: 207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fry, D.E. (2000). Peritonitis: Management of the Patient with SIRS and MODS. In: Baue, A.E., Faist, E., Fry, D.E. (eds) Multiple Organ Failure. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1222-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1222-5_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-7049-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-1222-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics