Adhesion Prevention: The Role of Fibrin Glue

  • Matthias Korell

Abstract

The formation of adhesions is very common after intra-abdominal surgery. It represents one of the major complications, especially in reproductive surgery, which may lead to infertility and abdominal symptoms going so far as the ileus. 1,2 Following myomectomy or reconstructive tubal surgery in particular the incidence of postoperative adhesions reaches more than 90%.3

Keywords

Cellulose Lactate Syringe Peri Thrombin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Monk B, Berman M, Montz F. Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: clinical significance etiology and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1396–1403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stone K. Adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 5:322–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tulandi T, Murray C, Guralnik M. Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:213–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    diZerega G. Comtemporary adhesion prevention. Fertil Steril 1994; 61:219–235.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holtz G. Prevention and management of peritoneal adhesions. Fertil Steril 1984; 41:497–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyers S, Diamond M, DeCherney A. Reduction of postoperative pelvic adhesions in the rabbit with Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:1066–1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Interceed Adhesion Barrier Study Group. Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by Interceed (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 1989; 51:933–938.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linsky C, Diamond M, Cunningham T, et al. Adhesion reduction in the rabbit uterine horn model using an resorbable barrier, TC7. J Reprod Med 1987; 32:17–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Surgical Membrane Study Group. Prophylaxis of pelvic sidewall adhesions with Gore-Tex surgical membrane: a multicenter clinical investigation. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:921–923.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korell M. Adhesion prophylaxis in gynecology. In: Treutner KH, Schumpelick V, eds. Peritoneal Adhesions. Heidelberg: Springer, 1996:325–330.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alleyne CH, Cawley CM, Barrow DL, et al. Efficacy and biocompatibility of a photopolymerized, synthetic, absorbable hydrogel as a durai sealant in a canine craniotomy model. J Neurosurg 1998; 88(2):308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frykman E, Jacobsson S, Widenfalk B. Fibrin sealant in prevention of flexor tendon adhesions: an experimental study in the rabbit. J Hand Surg 1993; 18(1):68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dickson CS, Magovern JA. The effect of fibrin glue on the formation of perivascular adhesions. Vasc Surg 1993; 27(1):15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brands W, Diehm TH, Lockbuhler H, König M, Stock M. The use of fibrin glue in the prophylaxis and therapy of intraabdominal adhesions. Chirurg 1990; 61(1):22–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zohar Y, Shwilli Y, Schimberg R, Buler N. Human fibrin glue in head and neck surgery. Harefuah 1994; 126(10):567–570, 628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boris WJ, Gu J, McGrath LB. Effectiveness of fibrin glue in the reduction of postoperative intrapericardial adhesions. J Invest Surg 1996; 9(4):327–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salvino CK, Esposito TJ, Smith DK, et al. Laparoscopic injection of fibrin glue to arrest intraparenchymal abdominal hemorrhage: an experimental study. J Trauma 1991; 35(5):762–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shinohara R, Kobayashi E, Yoshida T, et al. Effect of fibrin glue on small and large bowel anastomoses in the rat. Eur Surg Res 1998; 30(1):8–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Wejma IM, van den Ingh HFGM, Jeekel J. Effect of fibrin sealant on the healing colonic anastomosis in the rat. Br J Surg 1991; 78:49–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hulkko OA, Haukipuro KA, Laitinen ST. Fibrin glue protection of primary anastomosis in the obstructed left colon. An experimental study on the rat. Acta Chir Scand 1988; 154(1):49–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haberal A, Turgut F, Oral S, Demirhan B, Batioglu S. Comparison of microsurgery and cyanoacrylate for tubal anastomosis: an experimental study in the rat. J Gynecol Surg 1996; 12(4):261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takeuchi H, Awaji M, Hashimoto M, Nakano Y, Mitsuhashi N, Kuwabara Y. Reduction of adhesions with fibrin glue after laparoscopic excision of large ovarian endometriomas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3(4):575–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takeuchi HU, Toyonari Y, Mitsuhashi N, Kuwabara Y. Effects of fibrin glue on postsurgical adhesions after uterine or ovarian surgery in rabbits. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23(5):479–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ozeren S, Corakci A, Erk A, Yucesoy G, Yucesoy J, Karabacak O. The effects of human amniotic membrane and fibrin sealant in the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in the rabbit ovary model. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38/2:207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adamyan LV, Myinbayev OA, Kulakov VI. Use of fibrin glue in obstetrics and gynecology: a review of the literature. Int J Fertil 1991; 36(2):76–77, 81-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Adamyan LV, Myinbayev OA, Ishrat J, Kulakov VI. Comparative effects of different methods of anastomosis on rat uterine horn. Int J Fertil 1992; 37(6):368–372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gauwerky JFH, Klose RP, Vierneisel P, Basiert G. Fibrin glue for reanastomosis of the fallopian tube in the rabbit: adhesions and fertility. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 1992; 7(9):1274–1277.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gauwerky JFH, Klose RP, Forssmann WG. Fibrin glue for anastomosis of the fallopian tube: morphology. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 1993; 8(12):2108–2114.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Donnez J, Nisolle M. Laparoscopic management of large ovarian endometrial cyst: use of fibrin sealant. J Gynecol Surg 1991; 7(3):163–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adamyan LV, Kulakov VI, Myinbayev OA, Jahan I. Reproductive function after reconstructive surgery on rat uterine horns. Int J Fertil Menopaus Stud 1994; 39(4):229–233.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bilgin T, Cengiz C, Demir U. Postoperative adhesion formation following ovarian reconstruction with fibrin glue in the rabbit. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995; 39(3):186–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kamaci M, Zorlu CG, Suludere Z, Can C. Comparison of microsurgery and fibrin sealant in reanastomosis of the uterine horns of rats. J Gynecol Surg 1997; 3(3):125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    diZerega GS. Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tubalplasty, ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis and myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8:230–237.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Larsson B. Efficacy of Interceed in adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery: a review of 13 clinical studies. J Re-prod Med 1996; 41:27–34.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li TC, Cooke ID. The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Br J Obstet 1994; 101:335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mais V, Ajossa S, Piras B, Guerriero S, Marongiu D, Melis GB. Prevention of de novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidiced regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 1995; 10:3133–3135.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Evrard VA, De Bellis A, Boeckx W, Brosens IA. Peritoneal healing after fibrin glue application: a comparative study inarat model. Hum Reprod (Oxf) 1996; 11(9):1877–1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marana R, Muzii L, Catalano G, Caruana U, Mancuso L. Use of fibrin sealant for reproductive surgery: a randomized study in the rabbit model. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996; 41(3):199–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Virgilio C, Dubrow T, Sheppard BB, et al. Fibrin glue inhibits intra-abdominal adhesion formation. Arch Surg 1990; 125(10):1378–1382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Muzii L, Marana R. Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation in reproductive surgery. Ital J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996; 8(1):36–42.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sheppard BB, De Virgilio C, Bleiweis M, Milliken JC, Robertson JM. Inhibition of intra-abdominal adhesions: fibrin glue in a long term model. Am Surg 1993; 59:786–790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    De Iaco P, Costa A, Mazzoleni G, Pasquinelli G, Bassein L, Marabini A. Fibrin sealant in laparoscopic adhesion prevention in the rabbit uterine horn model. Fertil Steril 1994; 62:400–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Korell M, Scheidel P, Hepp H. An animal experimental model for adhesion reformation study. J Invest Surg 1994; 7:409–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lindenberg S, Steentoft P, Sorensen SS, Olesen HP. Studies on prevention of intra-abdominal adhesion formation by fibrin sealant. Acta Chir Scand 1985; 151:525–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caballero J, Tulandi T. Effects of Ringer’s lactate and fibrin glue on postsurgical adhesions. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol 1992; 37(2):141–143.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Myinbayev OA, Rubliova KI. Use of chemiluminescent method for evaluation of postoperative adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery: an experimental study. Am J Reprod Immunol 1996; 36(4):238–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Korell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations