Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Patient Care Information Systems pp 83–132Cite as

Designing Acceptable Patient Care Information Systems

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Computers in Health Care ((HI))

Abstract

The state of the art of patient care information systems has been constantly advancing over the last 20 years. New database tools, faster computers, graphical interfaces, and automated instruments promise impressive benefits to patient care and practice management. To the physician or nurse evaluating a patient care information system, however, there is only one critical question, “Can I do my work more easily and effectively than I could before?” No system can bring about its promised benefits if it is not accepted and used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cort R, Crawford AG. Tackling the technology. In Abrami PF, Johnson JE (eds). Bringing Computers to the Hospital Bedside. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1990; 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dick RS, Steen EB. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zielstorff RD, Hudgings CF, Grobe SF. Next-Generation Nursing Information Systems. Essential Characteristics for Professional Practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shneiderman, B. Response time and display rate in human performance with computers. Computing Surveys 1984; 16: 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zielstorff RD, McHugh ML, Clinton J. Computer Design Criteria For Systems That Support the Nursing Process. Kansas City, MI: American Nurses’ Association, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kolodner RM. Functional workstation requirements: clinical perspectives. International Journal of Biomedical Computing 1994; 34 (1-4): 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Childs BW. Four keys for creating the physician-IS interface. Healthcare Informatics 1993; August: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown A, MacDonald R. Types of point-of-care clinical computing systems and their role in different clinical environments. Proceedings of the 1991 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association 1991; 179-189.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haiford G, Burkes M, Pryor TA. Measuring the impact of bedside terminals. Nursing Management 1989; 20: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drazen E. How to select the right bedside system. Straight talk on bedside terminals. Presentation at the “User-to-User Straight Talk on Bedside Terminals” Conference, United Communications, Washington, DC, April 16, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sherwood P, Poleto MC. Integrating nursing documentation, acuity classification, and cost accounting systems. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association, 1993; 2: 164–184.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grewal R, Arcus J, Bowen J, et al. Bedside computerization of the ICU. Design Issues: Benefits of computerization versus ease of pen & paper. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 793-797.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald CJ, Tierney WM, Martin DK, et al. The Regenstreif medical record 1991: a campus-wide system. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 925-928.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Safran C, Rury C, Rind D et al. Outpatient medical records for a teaching hospital. Beginning the physician-computer dialogue. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 114-118.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anonymous. The Evolution of a Community Network. Community Medical Network Society, November 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teach RI, Shortliffe E. Analysis of physician attitudes regarding computer-based clinical consultation systems. Computers in Biomedical Research 1981; 14: 542–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bria WF, Rydell RL. The Physician-Computer Connection. A Practical Guide to Physician Involvement in Hospital Information Systems. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beck JR, Barnett GO, Clayton PD et al. Terminals and workstations for computer-based records. In Ball MJ, Collen MF (eds). Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992; 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michael PA. Physician-directed software design: the role of utilization statistics and user input in enhancing HELP results review capabilities. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 107-111.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teich JM, Hurley JF, Beckley RF et al. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sidelli RV, Johnson SB, Clayton PD. Full-text document storage and retrieval in a clinical information system. Topics in Health Information Management 1993; 13: 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bleich HW, Beckley RF, Horowitz GL, et al. Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. New England Journal of Medicine 1985; 312: 756–764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Personal communication with COL George Underwood, MD, CHCS Physician Project Officer, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McDonald CJ, Tierney WM, Overhage JM, et al. The Regenstreif Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers. MD Computing 1992; 9: 206–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Henke J, Whiting-O’Keefe QE, Whiting A, et al. STOR: From pilot project to medical center implementation. Proceedings of the 12th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1988; 733-737.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCallie D, Margulies D, Kohane I, et al. The Children’s Hospital clinician’s workstation. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1990; 755-759.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Teich JM, Geisler MA, Cimerman DE, et al. Design considerations in the BWH ambulatory medical record: features for maximum acceptance by clinicians. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1990; 735-739.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stead WM, Pryor DB, Smith PK, et al. Hospital information systems: a clinician’s expectations. In Bakker AR, Ball MJ, Scherrer JR, et al. eds. Towards New Hospital Information Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland), 1988; 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rowberg AH, Price TD. The need and user requirements for integrating images with radiology reports. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 163-167.

    Google Scholar 

  30. London JW, Morton DE. The integration of text, graphics, and radiographic images on X-terminal clinical workstations. Proceedings of MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland), 1992; 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bradshaw KE, Gardner RM, Clemmer TP, et al. Physician decision-making-evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1984; 1: 81–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang PC, Annevelink J, Fafchamps D, et al. Physicians’ workstations: integrated information management for clinicians. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 569-573.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tate KE, Gardner RM. Computers, quality, and the clinical laboratory. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 193-197.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hammond WE. TMR-A profile of an electronic medical record. Proceedings of MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland), 1992; 730–736.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hammond W, Stead WW. Adopting TMR for physician/nurse use. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 833-837.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Composite Health Care System Program Office, Medical Functional Information Management, U.S. Department of Defense, Falls Church, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Safran C, Rury CD, Lightfoot J, et al. ClinQuery: a program for interactive searching of clinical data. Proceedings of the 13th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1989; 414-418.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hammond WE, Straube MJ, Blunden PB, et al. Query: the language of databases. Proceedings of the 13th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1989; 419-423.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, et al. Physicians’ information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991; 114: 576–581.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Horowitz GL, Bleich HL. PaperChase: a computer program to search the medical literature. New England Journal of Medicine 1981; 305: 924–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Singer J, Sacks HS, Lucente F, et al. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer database systems. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1983; 249: 1610–1614.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sandness JG. Use of online databases by practicing physicians. Proceedings of the 13th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1989; 456-461.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gorman P. Does the medical literature contain the evidence to answer the questions of primary care physicians? Preliminary findings of a study. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994;571-575.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DAB. The Unified Medical Language System Project: a distributed experiment in improving access to biomedical information. Proceedings of MEDINFO 92. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland), 1992; 1496–1499.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, Aguirre A, et al. The Medline button. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 81-85.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miller RA, Gieszcykiewicz FM, Vries JK, et al. CHARTLINE: providing bibliographic references relevant to patient charts using the UMLS Metathesaurus Knowledge Sources. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 86-90.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tuttle MS, Sheretz DD, Fagan LM, et al. Toward an interim standard for patient-centered knowledge access. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 564-568.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tuttle MS, Sheretz DD, Fagan LM, et al. Toward a patient-centered knowledge-server standard for CPRs. Proceedings of the Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: Health Information Management System Society, 1994; Vol 2: 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Safran C, Hermann F, Rind D, et al. Computer-based support for clinical decision making. M.D. Computing 1990; 7: 319–322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bikson TK, Gutek BA, Mankin DA. Implementing Computerized Procedures in Office Settings. Influences and Outcomes. R-3077-NSF/IRIS. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lurie N, Rank B, Parenti C, et al. How do house officers spend their nights? A time study of internal medicine house staff on call. New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320: 1673–1677.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ, et al. How do interns spend their days: a time-motion study of internal medicine interns. Clinical Research 1991; 39: 794A.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lange LL. Information-seeking by nurses during beginning-of-shift activities. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 317-321.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG. Expanding the concept of medical information: An observational study of physicians’ information needs. Computers and Biomedical Research 1992; 25: 181–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fafchamps D, Young CY, Tang PC. Modelling work practices: input to the design of a physician’s workstation. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 788-792.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Malbin K, Putz B, Mitchell M, et al. The process and outcome of a collaborative effort to design and implement a clinician order processing system. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 785-786.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nowlan AW. Clinical workstations: identifying clinical requirements and understanding clinical information. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1994; 34(1–4): 85–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hravnak M, Stein KL, Dale B, et al. Ongoing development of the critical care information system: The collaborative approach to automating information management in an intensive care unit. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 3-7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Connelly DP, Werth DW, Hultman BK, et al. Physician use of an NICU laboratory reporting system. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 8-12.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rochman R. Facilitating and enhancing the role of the nurse: The nurse and the clinical workstation. In Marr PB, Axford RL, Newbold SK, eds. Nursing Informatics’ 91. Proceedings of the Post Conference on Health Care Information Technology: Implications for Change. Springer Verlag 1991; 105-111.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ball MJ, Silva JS, Douglas JV et al. The health care professional workstation. Proceedings of a working conference sponsored by the International Medical Information Association. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1994; 34(1–4): 1–416.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kolodner RM. Functional workstation requirements: clinical perspectives. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1994; 34: 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Chignell MH, Hancock PA, Loewenthal A. An introduction to intelligent interfaces 1-22, In Hancock PA, Chignell MH. (eds). Intelligent interfaces. Theory, research, and design. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Safran C. Defining clinical workstation. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1994; 34(1–4): 261–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Clayton PD, Pulver GE, Hill CL. Physician use of computers: is age or value the predominant factor? Proceedings of the 17th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994: 301-305.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Turley JP, Connelly DP. The relationship between nursing and medical cultures: Implications for the design and implementation of a clinician’s workstation.Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994: 233-237.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center. II. Impact on medical education. Academic Medicine 1993; 68: 25–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Zibrack JD, Roberts MS, Nelick-Cohen L, et al. Creating an environment conducive to physician participation in a hospital information system. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1990; 779-783.

    Google Scholar 

  69. O’Dell DV, Tape TG, Campbell JR. Increasing physician acceptance and use of the computerized ambulatory record. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992; 848-852.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ischar R, Aydin CE. Predicting effective use of hospital computer systems. Proceedings of the 12th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1988; 862-868.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Staggers N. Human factors. The missing element in computer technology. Computers in Nursing 1991; 9: 47–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Work Group on Computerization of Patient Records. Toward a National Health Information Infrastructure. Report to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, April 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Government Accounting Office. Medical ADP Systems. Automated Records Hold Promise to Improve Patient Care. GAO/IMTEC-91-5. Washington, DC, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Witte VR, Matthews P. Managing change through nursing informatics. Proceedings of the 1992 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: American Hospital Association, 1992; 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Boyer A, Levine HS. Automation of clinical documentation-an in-depth assessment from the care giver’s perspective. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: Health Information Management System Society, 1993; 1: 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Andreshak JC, Lumelsky S, Chang IF, et al. Medication charting via computer gesture recognition. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1990; 865-869.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Chang MM. Clinician-entered computerized psychiatric triage records. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1987; 38: 652–656.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Teich JM, Hurley JF, Beckley RF, et al. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pryor A. Current state of computer-based patient records. 67-82. In Ball M, Collen M (eds.) Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record. Springer Verlag 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sittig DF, Stead WM. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1994; 1: 108–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Gibbons PS, Anderson AJ, Drossel LM, et al. Coordinated delivery of clinical care: The “re-integration” of the medical group practice. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 64-68.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Martin JM, et al. Computer-assisted order entry: Impact on intern time. Clinical Research 1991; 39: 794A.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Potolicchio S, Hylton J, Broering NC, et al. Enhancing clinical investigation in neurology with a patient information system. Proceedings of the 12th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1988; 688-692.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Siders AM, Peterson M. Increasing patient satisfaction and nursing productivity through implementation of an automated nursing discharge summary. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 136-140.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Grewal R, Arcus J, Bowen J, et al. Design and development of an automated nursing note. Proceedings of the Seventh World Congress on Medical Informatics (MEDINFO 92). Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992; 1054–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Campbell KE, Wieckert K, Fagan LM, et al. A computer-based tool for generation of progress notes. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 284-288.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Campbell JR. Content and organization of the computerized ambulatory record. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 863.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Cimino JJ, Barnett GO. The physician’s workstation: recording a physical examination using a controlled vocabulary. Proceedings of the 11th SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1987; 287-291.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Clark AS, Shea S. Developing a controlled vocabulary for the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center outpatient clinical information system. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1990; 205-209.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Payne TS, Martin DR. How useful is the UMLS Metathesaurus in developing a controlled vocabulary for an automated problem list? Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 705-709.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kuperman. Issues in the creation of on-line problem lists. Panel Presentation at Spring AMIA Meeting, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Huff SM, Pryor TA, Tebbs RD. Pick from thousands. A collaborative processing model for coded data entry. Proceedings of the 15th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 104-108.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Safran C, Rury C, Rind D, et al. A computer-based outpatient medical record for a teaching hospital. M.D. Computing 1991; 8: 291–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Dewey JB, Manning P, Brandt S. Acceptance of direct physician access to a computer-based patient record in a managed care setting. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 79-83.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Rind DM, Safran C. Real and imagined barriers to an electronic medical record. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill Inc., 1994; 74-78.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Laughlin ML. User interfaces: where the rubber meets the road. Computers in Healthcare 1993; February: 16-22.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Murchie CJ, Kenny GNC. Comparison of keyboard, light pen, and voice recognition as methods of data input. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1988; 5: 243–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Trofino J. Voice-recognition technology applied to nursing documentation. Healthcare Information Management 1993; 7: 41–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Tang P, Patel VL. Major issues in user interface design for health professional workstations: summary and recommendations. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 1994; 34(1–4): 139–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Collinson PO, Jones RG, Howes M, et al. Of mice and men-data capture in the clinical environment. International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1989; 6: 217–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Levy AH, Lawrence DP. Data acquisition for the computer-based patient record. 125–139 In Ball MJ, Collen MF (eds). Aspects of the Computer-Based Patient Record. New York: Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Hughes S. Information systems that support patient care delivery and nursing practice. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: Health Information Management System Society, 1993; 3: 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Roberts MS, Zibrack JD, Siders A, et al. The development of an on-line, partially automated discharge summary and core clinical database in an existing hospital information system. Proceedings of the 13th Annual SCAMC. IEEE Publishers, 1989; 649-653.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Petersen P. Computerized hospital information systems: a tool in quality. Presentation at the 1991 HIMSS Annual Conference, February 11–14, 1991, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Karcz A, Holbrook J, Auerbach BS, et al. Preventability of malpractice claims in emergency medicine: A closed claims study. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1990; 19: 865–873.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Zander K. Nursing case management: strategic management of cost and quality outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration 1988; 18: 23–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Coffey RJ, Richards JS, Remmert CS, et al. An introduction to critical paths. Quality Management in Health Care 1992; 1: 45–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Ashworth GB, Aubrey C. Collaborative care documentation by exception system. Proceedings of the 16th Annual SCAMC. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992; 109-113.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Burke LJ, Murphy J. Charting by Exception. A Cost-Effective, Quality Approach. Media, PA: Harwal Publishing Company, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Barrett MJ. Case management a must to survive managed care. Computers in Healthcare 1993; June: 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Lumsdon K, Hagland M. Mapping care. Hospitals and Health Networks, 1993; 67(19): 34–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Glaser JP, Beckley RF, Roberts P, et al. A very large PC LAN as the basis for a hospital information system. Journal of Medical Systems 1991; 15: 133–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Teich JM, Spurr CM, Flammini SJ, et al. Response to a trial of physician-based inpatient order entry. Proceedings of the 17th Annual SCAMC, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994; 316-320.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Spurr C, Glaser JP, Teich J, et al. Implementation of provider clinical order entry: One hospital’s experience. Proceedings of the 1994 Annual HIMSS Conference, Chicago, IL: Health Information Management System Society, 1994; 2: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Bates DW, O’Neill AC, Teich JM, et al. Identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems. Clinical Research 1993; 41: PA526.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269: 379–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center. I. Impact on organizational culture and behavior. Academic Medicine 1993; 68: 20–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Bates DW, Brigham and Women’s Hospital (manuscript in preparation), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jane B. Metzger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan M. Teich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Metzger, J.B., Teich, J.M. (1995). Designing Acceptable Patient Care Information Systems. In: Patient Care Information Systems. Computers in Health Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0829-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0829-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0829-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation