Skip to main content

Quantitative Risk Assessment for Clustered Binary Data

  • Conference paper
Statistical Modelling

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 104))

  • 483 Accesses

Abstract

The effect of misspecifying the parametric response model for a univariate clustered binary outcome from a toxicological study on the assessment of dose effect and on estimating a virtually safe dose is investigated. Marginal and conditional models are contrasted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cox, D. R. (1972) The analysis of multivariate binary data. Applied Statistics 21, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K. S. and Howe, R. B. (1985) A review of methods for calculating statistical confidence limits in low dose extrapolation. In: Toxicologiacal Risk Assessment, Volume I: Biologicial and Statistical Criteria, Clayson, D. B., Krewski, D., and Munro, I. (eds.) CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, W.W. and Donner, A. (1977) Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in logit analysis. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 72, 851–853.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, J.C. (1973) Proportions with extraneous variance: single and independent samples. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 68, 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupper, L. L., Portier, C., Hogan, M. D., and Yamamoto, E. (1986) The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. Biometrics, 42, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkopoulou, M. and Ryan, L. (1994) Global tests for multiple binary outcomes. Biometrics, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G. and Ryan, L.M. (1994) Likelihood inference for clustered multivariate binary data. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotnitzky, A. and Wypij, D. (1994) A note on the bias of estimators with missing data. Biometrics, 50, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. (1992) Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics, 48, 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Molenberghs, G., Declerck, L., Aerts, M. (1995). Quantitative Risk Assessment for Clustered Binary Data. In: Seeber, G.U.H., Francis, B.J., Hatzinger, R., Steckel-Berger, G. (eds) Statistical Modelling. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 104. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0789-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0789-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94565-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0789-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics