Skip to main content

Postcensal Population Estimates: States, Counties, and Places

  • Chapter
  • 140 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 108))

Abstract

The U. S. Bureau of the Census produces population estimates for the nation, states, counties, and places (cities, towns, and townships) as part of its program to quantify changes in population size and distribution since the last census. These estimates provide updates to the population counts by demographic and geographic characteristics from the last census. They also indicate the pace of population change since the last census and the relative influence of the components of population change. While the national estimates can be produced by a careful accounting system that adds annual births, deaths, and international migration to the previous year’s population, subnational estimates require development of methods for dealing with the largely unmeasured component effects of internal migration. Many of these methods represent the type of small domain estimates that constitute the subject of this report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batutis, Michael J. 1991. “Subnational Population Estimates Methods of the U. S. Bureau of the Census,” U. S. Bureau of the Census, Population Division Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. 1991. Formula Programs: Adjusted Census Data Would Redistribute Small Percentage of Funds to States. November. GAO/GGD-92–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. and J. Tayman. 1982. “Measuring Temporal Stability in Regression Models of Population Estimation.” Demography, 19:135–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, N. K. 1972. “On the Ratio-Correlation and Related Methods of Subnational Population Estimation.” Demography. 9: 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. 1980, Estimating Population and Income of Small Areas. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. 1976. “Report on a Multiple Regression Method for Making Population Estimate.” Demography. 13:369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P. 1980. “A Note on the Use of Regression Methods in Population Estimates.” Demography. 17:341–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, Linda K., John F. Carlson, and David A. Swanson. “A Variation of the Housing Unit Method for Estimating the Population of Small, Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Local Expert Procedure,” Survey Methodology, 19: 155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stanley K. and Bart Lewis. 1980. “Some New Techniques for Applying the Housing Unit Method of Local Population Estimation,” Demography, 17: 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stanley K. and Bart Lewis. 1983. “Some New Techniques for Applying the Housing Unit Method of Local Population Estimation: Further Evidence”, Demography, 20: 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, David A. 1980. “Improving Accuracy in Multiple Regression Estimates of Population Using Principles from Causal emography. 17:413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stanley K. and Marylou Mandell. 1984. “A Comparison of Population Estimation Methods: Housing Unit Versus Component II, Ratio Correlation, and Administrative Records,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79: 282–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stanley K. 1986. “A Review and Evaluation of the Housing Unit Method of Population Estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82: 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. Population Estimation Methods: Canada. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, David W. 1989. “Confidence Intervals for Postcensal Population Estimates: A Case Study for Local Areas,” Survey Methodology. 15: 217–280.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, David W. and L. Tedrow. 1984. “Improving the Measurement of Temporal Change in Regression Models Used for County Population Estimates,” Demography. 21: 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayman, Jeff and Edward Schafer. 1985. “The Impact of Coefficient Drift and Measurement Error on the Accuracy of Ratio-Correlation Population Estimates.” The Review of Regional Studies. 15:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1980. “Population and Per Capita Money Income Estimates for Local Areas: Detailed Methodology and Evaluation,” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No 699.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1983. “Evaluation of Population Estimation Procedures for States, 1980: an Interim Report.” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 933.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S Bureau of the Census. 1984. “Estimates of the Population of States: 1970 to 1983,” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 957.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1985. “Evaluation of 1980 Subcounty Population Estimates,” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 963.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1986. “Evaluation of Population Estimation Procedures for Counties: 1980,” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 984.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1987. “State Population and Household Estimates, With Age, Sex, and Components of Change: 1981–1986”, Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1988. “Use of Federal Tax Returns in the Bureau of the Census’ Population Estimates and Projections Program”. Population Division Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1988. “Methodology for Experimental County Population Estimates for the 1980s”, Current Population Reports. Special Studies. Series P-23, No. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1989. “Population Estimates by Race and Hispanic Origin for States, Metropolitan Areas, and Selected Counties: 1980 to 1985.” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 1040-RD-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1989. “County Population Estimates: July 1, 1988, 1987, and 1986,” Current Population Reports, Series P-26, No. 88-A.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. “Population Estimates for Metropolitan Statistical Areas: July 1, 1988, 1987, and 1986,” Current Population Reports. Series P-26, No. 88-B.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1990. “State Population and Household Estimates: July 1, 1989.” Current Population Reports. Series P-25, No. 1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1990, “1988 Population and 1987 Per Capita Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places,” Current Population Reports. Series P-26, No. 88-SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vate, Barbara J. 1988. “Methods Used in Estimating the Population of Substate Areas in the United States,” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Small Area Statistics, New Orleans, LA, Aug. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Long, J.F. (1996). Postcensal Population Estimates: States, Counties, and Places. In: Schaible, W.L. (eds) Indirect Estimators in U.S. Federal Programs. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 108. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0721-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0721-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-94616-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-0721-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics